Paper · 2004 · Plant Nutrition and Fertilizing Science

Effect of long-term fertilization on wheat quality and yield in grey desert soil

Huan Qu

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The results of 12-year located fertilization in grey desert soil of Xinjiang showed that treatments of N, NP, NK, NPK could improve the grain quality in some indexes compared with CK. The contents of crude protein, essential and total amino acid, characters of the flour and dough qualities of long-term without N application (PK) declined significantly, and the ash content increased. Compared with chemical fertilizer applying only (N, NP, NK, PK, NPK) and CK, treatment of NPK with farm yard manure (NPK+M) had a better effect on improving flour and dough qualities in most of indexes. Contrast to CK, the treatment of crop straw return to field (NPK+S) increased the 1000-seed weight and dough tenacity ability and decreased the other characters in a certain degree. Chemical fertilizer combined with farm yard manure was very important to build up soil fertility, increase yield and improve grain quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

N, NP, NK and NPK improved some grain quality indices over CK.

Treatment
N, NP, NK, NPKe0
Outcome
grain quality in some indexese0
Direction
improvee0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“treatments of N, NP, NK, NPK could improve the grain quality in some indexes compared with CK”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 89–182 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

PK significantly decreased crude protein and amino acid content and flour and dough qualities.

Treatment
long-term without N application (PK)e0
Outcome
contents of crude protein, essential and total amino acid, characters of the flour and dough qualitiese0
Direction
declinede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“contents of crude protein, essential and total amino acid, characters of the flour and dough qualities of long-term without N application (PK) declined significantly”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 188–353 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

PK increased ash content.

Outcome
ash contente0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“and the ash content increased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 355–384 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus manure improved most flour and dough qualities over fertilizer alone and CK.

Treatment
NPK with farm yard manure (NPK+M)e0
Outcome
flour and dough qualities in most of indexese0
Direction
bettere0
Comparator
chemical fertilizer applying only (N, NP, NK, PK, NPK) and CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Compared with chemical fertilizer applying only (N, NP, NK, PK, NPK) and CK, treatment of NPK with farm yard manure (NPK+M) had a better effect on improving flour and dough qualities in most of indexes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 386–587 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus straw increased thousand seed weight and dough tenacity relative to CK.

Treatment
crop straw return to field (NPK+S)e0
Outcome
1000-seed weight and dough tenacity abilitye0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
CKe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Contrast to CK, the treatment of crop straw return to field (NPK+S) increased the 1000-seed weight and dough tenacity ability”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–714 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

NPK plus straw decreased other measured characteristics to some degree.

Outcome
other characterse0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreased the other characters in a certain degree”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 719–769 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded that fertilizer plus manure builds soil fertility, increases yield and improves grain quality.

Treatment
Chemical fertilizer combined with farm yard manuree0
Outcome
build up soil fertility, increase yield and improve grain qualitye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Chemical fertilizer combined with farm yard manure was very important to build up soil fertility, increase yield and improve grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 771–909 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–42 · show in text ↑

nanoparticle · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 20 positive, 2 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 119 positive, 35 negative or no effect

118 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

454 papers: 400 positive, 54 negative or no effect

399 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

This paper is about lacking the nutrient, so it counts the other way round here.

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

450 papers more in this group

See all 454 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.