Abstract
Samukh region is one of the main places in agricultural production, including grape production in Azerbaijan. Therefore, the study of the agrochemical properties of soils under vineyards, the current state of fertilizer introduction, increasing the efficiency of their use, a steady increase in soil fertility, yield and quality of grape harvest, as well as periodic environmental assessment of soils are urgent tasks that have both scientific, theoretical and practical value in the development of viticulture. In studies for the first time in the conditions of the Samukh region of Azerbaijan, on the basis of agrochemical and agroecological assessment of soils under vineyards, rational norms of fertilizers were determined against the background of manure, resulting in an increase in soil fertility, crop yield and quality of the grape harvest. The article describes the effect of fertilizers on the number of common and fruit shoots, the number of clusters in one crop, as well as on the fruit coefficient of the total shoots and the fruit coefficient of fruit shoots. The introduction of fertilizer standards against the background of manure significantly increased the development indicators of the grape culture on the irrigated light chestnut soils of the study area. So, in comparison with the variant without fertilizers in the experimental variants, the number of total shots per crop increased within 1.2–1.9 pcs., Fruit shoots — 1.6–2.8 pcs. The number of bunches — 3.3–5.8 pcs. The fruit coefficient of total shoots increased in the range of 0.07–0.14%, and the fruit coefficient of fruit shoots in the range of 0.06–0.11%.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer norms against a manure background increased soil fertility of grape vineyards.
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Development of Grape Culture”
e1“rational norms of fertilizers were determined against the background of manure, resulting in an increase in soil fertility, crop yield and quality of the grape harvest”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer norms against a manure background increased crop yield and quality of the grape harvest.
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Treatment
- rational norms of fertilizerse1
- Outcome
- crop yield and qualitye1
- Direction
- increasee1
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Development of Grape Culture”
e1“rational norms of fertilizers were determined against the background of manure, resulting in an increase in soil fertility, crop yield and quality of the grape harvest”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizer standards against a manure background significantly increased development indicators of grape culture on irrigated light chestnut soils.
- Taxon
- grapet0
- Treatment
- introduction of fertilizer standards against the background of manuree2
- Outcome
- development indicators of the grape culturee2
- Direction
- increasede2
- Setting
- irrigated light chestnut soilse2
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
t0“Development of Grape Culture”
e2“The introduction of fertilizer standards against the background of manure significantly increased the development indicators of the grape culture on the irrigated light chestnut soils of the study area”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizers increased the number of total shoots per grape crop by 1.2–1.9 pcs. compared with the variant without fertilizers.
Verbatim
t0“Development of Grape Culture”
e3“in comparison with the variant without fertilizers in the experimental variants, the number of total shots per crop increased within 1.2–1.9 pcs.”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizers increased fruit shoots of grape by 1.6–2.8 pcs. compared with the variant without fertilizers.
Verbatim
t0“Development of Grape Culture”
e3“in comparison with the variant without fertilizers in the experimental variants, the number of total shots per crop increased within 1.2–1.9 pcs.”
e4“Fruit shoots — 1.6–2.8 pcs.”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizers increased the number of bunches of grape by 3.3–5.8 pcs. compared with the variant without fertilizers.
Verbatim
t0“Development of Grape Culture”
e3“in comparison with the variant without fertilizers in the experimental variants, the number of total shots per crop increased within 1.2–1.9 pcs.”
e5“The number of bunches — 3.3–5.8 pcs.”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizers increased the fruit coefficient of total shoots of grape by 0.07–0.14%.
Verbatim
t0“Development of Grape Culture”
e3“in comparison with the variant without fertilizers in the experimental variants, the number of total shots per crop increased within 1.2–1.9 pcs.”
e6“The fruit coefficient of total shoots increased in the range of 0.07–0.14%”
Claim · model-written summary
Fertilizers increased the fruit coefficient of fruit shoots of grape by 0.06–0.11%.
Verbatim
t0“Development of Grape Culture”
e3“in comparison with the variant without fertilizers in the experimental variants, the number of total shots per crop increased within 1.2–1.9 pcs.”
e7“and the fruit coefficient of fruit shoots in the range of 0.06–0.11%”
The same questions in other papers
fertilization · yield · VitisResults differ
96 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
103 papers more in this group
See all 107 papers →fertilization · soil: chemistry · VitisPositive and negative results
12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
10 papers more in this group
See all 14 papers →fertilization · quality: general · VitisPositive and negative results
27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
34 papers more in this group
See all 38 papers →fertilization · growth · VitisPositive and negative results
42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.