Paper · 2020 · Agronomía Colombiana

Selection of sowing date and biofertilization as alternatives to improve the yield and profitability of the F68 rice variety

Yeison Mauricio Quevedo-Amaya; José Isidro Beltrán-Medina; José Álvaro Hoyos-Cartagena; et al.

11
claims
28
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

Multiple factors influence rice yield. Developing management practices that increase crop yield and an efficient use of resources are challenging to modern agriculture. Consequently, the aim of this study was to evaluate biological nitrogen fixation and bacterial phosphorous solubilization (biofertilization) practices with the selection of the sowing date. Three sowing dates (May, July and August) were evaluated when interacting with two mineral nutrition treatments using a randomized complete block design in a split-plot arrangement. Leaf carbon balance, leaf area index, interception and radiation use efficiency, harvest index, dry matter accumulation, nutritional status, and yield were quantified. Results showed that the maximum yield was obtained in the sowing date of August. Additionally, yield increased by 18.92% with the biofertilization treatment, reaching 35.18% of profitability compared to the local production practice. High yields were related to a higher carbon balance during flowering, which was 11.56% and 54.04% higher in August than in July and May, respectively, due to a lower night temperature. In addition, a high efficient use of radiation, which in August was 17.56% and 41.23% higher than in July and May, respectively, contributed to obtain higher yields and this behavior is related to the selection of the sowing date. Likewise, a rapid development of the leaf area index and an optimum foliar nitrogen concentration (>3%) were observed. This allowed for greater efficient use of radiation and is attributed to the activity of nitrogen-fixing and phosphate solubilizing bacteria that also act as plant growth promoters.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The August sowing date gave the maximum rice yield among the three sowing dates

Material
F68t0
Treatment
sowing datee1
Outcome
yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Comparator
May, Julye2

Not reportedValue

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“F68 rice variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that the maximum yield was obtained in the sowing date of August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–788 · show in text ↑
e2

“Three sowing dates (May, July and August) were evaluated”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 359–415 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilization increased rice yield by 18.92%

Material
F68t0
Treatment
biofertilization treatmente3
Outcome
yielde3
Direction
increasede3
Value
18.92%e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“F68 rice variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
e3

“yield increased by 18.92% with the biofertilization treatment, reaching 35.18% of profitability compared to the local production practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biofertilization reached 35.18% higher profitability than the local production practice

Material
F68t0
Treatment
biofertilization treatmente3
Outcome
profitabilitye3
Direction
higherinferrede3
Value
35.18%e3
Comparator
local production practicee3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“F68 rice variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
e3

“yield increased by 18.92% with the biofertilization treatment, reaching 35.18% of profitability compared to the local production practice”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 804–941 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon balance during flowering was 11.56% higher in August than in July

Material
F68t0
Organ / stage
floweringe4
Treatment
sowing datee1
Outcome
carbon balancee4
Direction
highere4
Value
11.56%e4
Comparator
Julye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“F68 rice variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that the maximum yield was obtained in the sowing date of August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–788 · show in text ↑
e4

“carbon balance during flowering, which was 11.56% and 54.04% higher in August than in July and May, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1092 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Carbon balance during flowering was 54.04% higher in August than in May

Material
F68t0
Organ / stage
floweringe4
Treatment
sowing datee1
Outcome
carbon balancee4
Direction
highere4
Value
54.04%e4
Comparator
Maye4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“F68 rice variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that the maximum yield was obtained in the sowing date of August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–788 · show in text ↑
e4

“carbon balance during flowering, which was 11.56% and 54.04% higher in August than in July and May, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1092 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The higher flowering-stage carbon balance in August is attributed to a lower night temperature

Material
F68t0
Organ / stage
floweringe4
Treatment
lower night temperaturee5
Outcome
carbon balancee4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“F68 rice variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
e4

“carbon balance during flowering, which was 11.56% and 54.04% higher in August than in July and May, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 980–1092 · show in text ↑
e5

“due to a lower night temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1094–1126 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiation use efficiency was 17.56% higher in August than in July

Material
F68t0
Treatment
sowing datee1
Outcome
efficient use of radiatione6
Direction
highere6
Value
17.56%e6
Comparator
Julye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“F68 rice variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that the maximum yield was obtained in the sowing date of August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–788 · show in text ↑
e6

“a high efficient use of radiation, which in August was 17.56% and 41.23% higher than in July and May, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1255 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Radiation use efficiency was 41.23% higher in August than in May

Material
F68t0
Treatment
sowing datee1
Outcome
efficient use of radiatione6
Direction
highere6
Value
41.23%e6
Comparator
Maye6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“F68 rice variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
e1

“Results showed that the maximum yield was obtained in the sowing date of August”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 709–788 · show in text ↑
e6

“a high efficient use of radiation, which in August was 17.56% and 41.23% higher than in July and May, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1255 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A rapid development of the leaf area index was observed in rice

Material
F68t0
Outcome
leaf area indexe7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“F68 rice variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
e7

“a rapid development of the leaf area index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1369–1411 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

An optimum foliar nitrogen concentration above 3% was observed in rice

Material
F68t0
Outcome
foliar nitrogen concentratione0
Value
>3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“F68 rice variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“an optimum foliar nitrogen concentration (>3%) were observed”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1416–1476 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater efficient use of radiation is attributed to nitrogen-fixing and phosphate-solubilizing bacteria

Material
F68t0
Interactor
nitrogen-fixing and phosphate solubilizing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
efficient use of radiatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“F68 rice variety”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 108–124 · show in text ↑
e0

“greater efficient use of radiation and is attributed to the activity of nitrogen-fixing and phosphate solubilizing bacteria”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1618 · show in text ↑

sowing time · molecular: metabolites · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

sowing time · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

193 papers: 123 positive, 70 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 68 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

189 papers more in this group

See all 193 papers →

inoculation · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

418 papers: 382 positive, 36 negative or no effect

381 papers in the same direction as this paper · 31 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

414 papers more in this group

See all 418 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.