Paper · 2020 · Egyptian Journal of Horticulture

Relative Comparison Salinity Stress Tolerance for “Manfaluty” and “Wonderful” Pomegranate Cultivar Transplants

Noha Mansour

7
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The goal was to evaluate the response of pomegranate cultivar transplants “Manfaluty” and “Wonderful” for salinity stress. A pot investigation was conducted during (2016 and 2017) seasons in a glasshouse, Faculty of Agriculture, Ain Shams Univ., Shoubra EL- Kheima, Egypt. Pots were arranged in a randomized complete design with two factors, the first one was pomegranate cultivars which included two cultivars namely (Manfaluty and Wonderful) and the second factor was NaCl levels whereas, transplants were irrigated with five levels of water salinity (0, 20, 40, 60, and 80 mM NaCl). It could be summarized results in some main points: - Both pomegranate cultivars were moderately resistant to salinity up to 40 Mm NaCl with slight growth reduction. -More increase in salinity level up to 60 and 80 mM NaCl reduction growth around 50-70% compared with untreated transplants. Generally, “Manfaluty” had a slightly higher reduction in growth than “Wonderful”. -Increasing salinity levels caused a significant reduction in leaf K content otherwise Na was accumulated in the leaves of both ‘pomegranate cultivars. -Proline leaves content, increased gradually by the increase in salinity levels up to (60 mM NaCl), and the highest significant values of proline content were obtained when combing (60mM NaCl) with “Wonderful”. So it could be concluded that, increasing salinity level more than 40 mM NaCl will inhibit pomegranate growth and make an imbalance of nutrient status in pomegranate transplants with slight differences between the response of two cultivars.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Both cultivars tolerated salinity up to 40 Mm NaCl with slight growth reduction.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Outcome
growth reductione0
Direction
slighte0
Qualifier
up to 40 Mm NaCle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both pomegranate cultivars were moderately resistant to salinity up to 40 Mm NaCl with slight growth reduction.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–751 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 60 and 80 mM NaCl, growth fell about 50-70% relative to untreated transplants.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
60 and 80 mM NaCle0
Outcome
growthe0
Direction
reductione0
Value
50-70%e0
Comparator
untreated transplantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate Cultivar Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“More increase in salinity level up to 60 and 80 mM NaCl reduction growth around 50-70% compared with untreated transplants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–876 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Manfaluty showed slightly more growth reduction than Wonderful.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
“Manfaluty”e0
Outcome
reduction in growthe0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
“Wonderful”e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate Cultivar Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 · show in text ↑
e0

““Manfaluty” had a slightly higher reduction in growth than “Wonderful”.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 888–959 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity significantly reduced leaf K content.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Increasing salinity levelse0
Outcome
leaf K contente0
Direction
reductione0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate Cultivar Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“Increasing salinity levels caused a significant reduction in leaf K content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1036 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity accumulated Na in leaves.

Taxon
pomegranatePunica granatume0
Treatment
Increasing salinity levelse0
Outcome
Na was accumulated in the leavese0
Direction
accumulatede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing salinity levels caused a significant reduction in leaf K content otherwise Na was accumulated in the leaves of both ‘pomegranate cultivars.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 961–1111 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Leaf proline content rose gradually as salinity increased to 60 mM NaCl.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
salinity levelse0
Outcome
Proline leaves contente0
Direction
increasede0
Qualifier
60 mM NaCle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate Cultivar Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“Proline leaves content, increased gradually by the increase in salinity levels up to (60 mM NaCl)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1113–1210 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Wonderful at 60mM NaCl had the highest significant leaf proline content.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
“Wonderful”e0
Treatment
60mM NaCle0
Outcome
proline contente0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Pomegranate Cultivar Transplants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–110 · show in text ↑
e0

“the highest significant values of proline content were obtained when combing (60mM NaCl) with “Wonderful””

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1321 · show in text ↑

sodium chloride · growth · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

6 papers: 0 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

salinity · nutrient: content · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 2 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.