Paper · 2019 · Journal of Pharmacognosy and Phytochemistry

Effect of nano iron oxide on growth and drymatter production of groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) in a calcareous vertisol

Manasa; Hebsur NS; R. Gobinath; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Iron deficiency is a widespread nutritional problem especially in plants growing in high pH and calcareous soils. A green house pot culture experiment was conducted to study the response of groundnut to soil application of nano iron formulations in a calcareous Vertisol. The experiment was conducted in a complete randomized block design with 11 treatments and three replications. Treatments comprised different doses of nano iron oxide in combination with FYM incubation. The results showed that soil application of nano iron oxide enhanced the growth and yield of groundnut. Among all the treatments, Application of nano Fe @ 2.5 mg kg-1 mixed with FYM recorded higher plant height (23.5, 26.7 and 35.7 cm), plant spread (23.6 cm, 30.8 cm and 36.7 cm), leaf area plant-1 (2.48, 6.42 and 9.95 dm2) and chlorophyll content (42.5, 48.5, 45.8) at 30, 60 and 90 days respectively. Total dry matter production (58.20 g) was also higher in the same treatment. While, lower growth and dry matter production were observed in control.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil application of nano iron oxide enhanced the growth and yield of groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeae0
Treatment
soil application of nano iron oxidee0
Outcome
growth and yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soil application of nano iron oxide enhanced the growth and yield of groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 498–576 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano Fe at 2.5 mg/kg with FYM gave higher plant height (23.5, 26.7 and 35.7 cm) in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
nano Fe @ 2.5 mg kg-1 mixed with FYMe0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
23.5, 26.7 and 35.7 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of nano Fe @ 2.5 mg kg-1 mixed with FYM recorded higher plant height (23.5, 26.7 and 35.7 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–709 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano Fe at 2.5 mg/kg with FYM gave higher plant spread (23.6, 30.8 and 36.7 cm) in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
nano Fe @ 2.5 mg kg-1 mixed with FYMe0
Outcome
plant spreade0
Direction
highere0
Value
23.6 cm, 30.8 cm and 36.7 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of nano Fe @ 2.5 mg kg-1 mixed with FYM recorded higher plant height (23.5, 26.7 and 35.7 cm), plant spread (23.6 cm, 30.8 cm and 36.7 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano Fe at 2.5 mg/kg with FYM gave higher leaf area per plant (2.48, 6.42 and 9.95 dm2) in groundnut.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
nano Fe @ 2.5 mg kg-1 mixed with FYMe0
Outcome
leaf area plant-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
2.48, 6.42 and 9.95 dm2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of nano Fe @ 2.5 mg kg-1 mixed with FYM recorded higher plant height (23.5, 26.7 and 35.7 cm), plant spread (23.6 cm, 30.8 cm and 36.7 cm), leaf area plant-1 (2.48, 6.42 and 9.95 dm2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–799 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nano Fe at 2.5 mg/kg with FYM gave higher chlorophyll content (42.5, 48.5, 45.8) in groundnut at 30, 60 and 90 days.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
nano Fe @ 2.5 mg kg-1 mixed with FYMe0
Outcome
chlorophyll contente0
Direction
highere0
Value
42.5, 48.5, 45.8e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of nano Fe @ 2.5 mg kg-1 mixed with FYM recorded higher plant height (23.5, 26.7 and 35.7 cm), plant spread (23.6 cm, 30.8 cm and 36.7 cm), leaf area plant-1 (2.48, 6.42 and 9.95 dm2) and chlorophyll content (42.5, 48.5, 45.8)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–842 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Total dry matter production (58.20 g) was higher in the nano Fe 2.5 mg/kg with FYM treatment.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Treatment
Application of nano Fe @ 2.5 mg kg-1 mixed with FYMe0
Outcome
Total dry matter productione1
Direction
highere1
Value
58.20 ge1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of nano Fe @ 2.5 mg kg-1 mixed with FYM”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 604–655 · show in text ↑
e1

“Total dry matter production (58.20 g) was also higher in the same treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–954 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower growth and dry matter production were observed in the control.

Taxon
groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
Outcome
growth and dry matter productione0
Direction
lowere0
Qualifier
in controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Arachis hypogaea
Arachis hypogaea · Taxon葉子 · CC0 · iNaturalist ↗

Verbatim

e0

“lower growth and dry matter production were observed in control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 963–1026 · show in text ↑
t0

“groundnut”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–73 · show in text ↑

iron atom · physiology: pigments · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

14 papers: 13 positive, 1 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

10 papers more in this group

See all 14 papers →

iron atom · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 14 positive, 2 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

iron atom · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

27 papers: 25 positive, 2 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

23 papers more in this group

See all 27 papers →

nanoparticle · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

29 papers: 27 positive, 2 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

25 papers more in this group

See all 29 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

36 papers: 35 positive, 1 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

32 papers more in this group

See all 36 papers →

fertilization · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

204 papers: 182 positive, 22 negative or no effect

181 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

200 papers more in this group

See all 204 papers →

application · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

222 papers: 215 positive, 7 negative or no effect

214 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

218 papers more in this group

See all 222 papers →

fertilization · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results

683 papers: 635 positive, 48 negative or no effect

634 papers in the same direction as this paper · 44 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

679 papers more in this group

See all 683 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.