Paper · 2021 · Alexandria Engineering Journal

Microbial biofertilizers increase fruit aroma content of Fragaria × ananassa by improving photosynthetic efficiency

Wenkai Duan; Lingyao Peng; Hui Zhang; et al.

20
claims
46
verbatim quotes
18
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Fragaria × ananassa is a widely-consumed fruit worldwide, valued for its pleasant flavor and nutritional properties. However, its lack of fragrance, unlike wild strawberries, results in customer dissatisfaction. In this study, we tested whether the biofertilizer Saccharomyces cerevisiae can enhance the aroma of strawberry. We used different fertilization methods, namely, mycorrhizal fertilization (MF) and foliar fertilization (FF), to investigate the effects of S. cerevisiae on various characteristics of F. ananassa. The results showed that the application of yeast under MF significantly increased the amount of soluble sugars and total volatiles. However, no significant difference was detected in the anthocyanin content. The amount of total volatiles in fruits under different treatments was 18.17 (MF), 11.78 (FF), and 9.51 (control) μg·g−1 fresh weight (FW). The main volatiles obtained from the fruits under MF, FF, and control treatments were esters (51.45%, 44.39%, and 29.39%, respectively), alcohols (35.93%, 28.77%, and 6.58%, respectively), and aldehydes (5.86%, 18.31%, and 62.88%, respectively). The photosynthetic rate and intercellular CO2 concentration were significantly influenced by the utilization of yeast strains. The MF treatment with yeast resulted in higher photosynthetic rate, and the plants from the FF treatment recording the highest intercellular CO2 concentration. Integrating the data of metabolites, it was suggested that S. cerevisiae, by generating CO2, promotes photosynthesis, leading to the increased sugar content in the fruits, which subsequently enhances the content of 3(2H)-Furanone, 4-methoxy-2, 5-dimethyl (DMMF) and phenylalanine-derived volatiles.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal yeast fertilization significantly increased soluble sugars in strawberry fruit.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
application of yeast under MFe0
Interactor
yeaste0other
Outcome
soluble sugarse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the application of yeast under MF significantly increased the amount of soluble sugars and total volatiles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Mycorrhizal yeast fertilization significantly increased total volatiles in strawberry fruit.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
application of yeast under MFe0
Interactor
yeaste0other
Outcome
total volatilese0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results showed that the application of yeast under MF significantly increased the amount of soluble sugars and total volatiles.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–654 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Anthocyanin content did not differ significantly under the yeast fertilization treatments.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
anthocyanin contente0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“However, no significant difference was detected in the anthocyanin content.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 655–730 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit total volatiles were 18.17 μg·g−1 fresh weight under MF.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
MFe0
Outcome
total volatiles in fruitse0
Value
18.17e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of total volatiles in fruits under different treatments was 18.17 (MF), 11.78 (FF), and 9.51 (control) μg·g−1 fresh weight (FW).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit total volatiles were 11.78 μg·g−1 fresh weight under FF.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
FFe0
Outcome
total volatiles in fruitse0
Value
11.78e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of total volatiles in fruits under different treatments was 18.17 (MF), 11.78 (FF), and 9.51 (control) μg·g−1 fresh weight (FW).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Control fruit total volatiles were 9.51 μg·g−1 fresh weight.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
total volatiles in fruitse0
Value
9.51e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The amount of total volatiles in fruits under different treatments was 18.17 (MF), 11.78 (FF), and 9.51 (control) μg·g−1 fresh weight (FW).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 731–870 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Esters comprised 51.45% of MF fruit volatiles.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
MFe0
Outcome
esterse0
Value
51.45%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main volatiles obtained from the fruits under MF, FF, and control treatments were esters (51.45%, 44.39%, and 29.39%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Esters comprised 44.39% of FF fruit volatiles.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
FFe0
Outcome
esterse0
Value
44.39%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main volatiles obtained from the fruits under MF, FF, and control treatments were esters (51.45%, 44.39%, and 29.39%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Esters comprised 29.39% of control fruit volatiles.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
controle0
Outcome
esterse0
Value
29.39%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The main volatiles obtained from the fruits under MF, FF, and control treatments were esters (51.45%, 44.39%, and 29.39%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 871–1006 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alcohols comprised 35.93% of MF fruit volatiles.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
MFe1
Outcome
alcoholse0
Value
35.93%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alcohols (35.93%, 28.77%, and 6.58%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1058 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruits under MF, FF, and control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alcohols comprised 28.77% of FF fruit volatiles.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
FFe1
Outcome
alcoholse0
Value
28.77%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alcohols (35.93%, 28.77%, and 6.58%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1058 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruits under MF, FF, and control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Alcohols comprised 6.58% of control fruit volatiles.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
controle1
Outcome
alcoholse0
Value
6.58%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“alcohols (35.93%, 28.77%, and 6.58%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1008–1058 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruits under MF, FF, and control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aldehydes comprised 5.86% of MF fruit volatiles.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
MFe1
Outcome
aldehydese0
Value
5.86%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aldehydes (5.86%, 18.31%, and 62.88%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1115 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruits under MF, FF, and control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aldehydes comprised 18.31% of FF fruit volatiles.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
FFe1
Outcome
aldehydese0
Value
18.31%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aldehydes (5.86%, 18.31%, and 62.88%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1115 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruits under MF, FF, and control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Aldehydes comprised 62.88% of control fruit volatiles.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
controle1
Outcome
aldehydese0
Value
62.88%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“aldehydes (5.86%, 18.31%, and 62.88%, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1115 · show in text ↑
e1

“fruits under MF, FF, and control treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 908–951 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Yeast treatment significantly influenced photosynthetic rate and intercellular CO2 concentration.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
utilization of yeast strainse0
Interactor
yeast strainse0other
Outcome
photosynthetic rate and intercellular CO2 concentratione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The photosynthetic rate and intercellular CO2 concentration were significantly influenced by the utilization of yeast strains.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1117–1243 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

MF yeast treatment produced a higher photosynthetic rate.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
MF treatment with yeaste0
Interactor
yeaste0other
Outcome
photosynthetic ratee0
Direction
highere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The MF treatment with yeast resulted in higher photosynthetic rate”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1244–1310 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

FF yeast treatment produced the highest intercellular CO2 concentration.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
FF treatmente0
Outcome
intercellular CO2 concentratione0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the plants from the FF treatment recording the highest intercellular CO2 concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1316–1402 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest yeast-generated CO2 promotes photosynthesis and increases fruit sugar content.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Interactor
S. cerevisiaeSaccharomyces cerevisiaee0other
Outcome
increased sugar content in the fruitse0
Qualifier
by generating CO2, promotes photosynthesise0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Saccharomyces cerevisiae
Saccharomyces cerevisiae · InteractorMasur · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“it was suggested that S. cerevisiae, by generating CO2, promotes photosynthesis, leading to the increased sugar content in the fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1441–1574 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest increased fruit sugars enhance DMMF and phenylalanine-derived volatiles.

Taxon
Fragaria × ananassaFragaria ×ananassat0
Outcome
content of 3(2H)-Furanone, 4-methoxy-2, 5-dimethyl (DMMF) and phenylalanine-derived volatilese0
Qualifier
increased sugar content in the fruitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increased sugar content in the fruits, which subsequently enhances the content of 3(2H)-Furanone, 4-methoxy-2, 5-dimethyl (DMMF) and phenylalanine-derived volatiles”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1537–1701 · show in text ↑
t0

“Fragaria × ananassa”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–76 · show in text ↑

fertilization · quality: phytochemicals · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

44 papers: 41 positive, 3 negative or no effect

40 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

40 papers more in this group

See all 44 papers →

mycorrhiza · physiology: photosynthesis · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

fertilization · physiology: osmolytes · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mycorrhiza · quality: phytochemicals · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

8 papers: 8 positive, 0 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

4 papers more in this group

See all 8 papers →

fertilization · physiology: photosynthesis · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

9 papers: 9 positive, 0 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.