Paper · 2021 · Digital Commons - USU (Utah State University)

Compost and Cover Crop Effects in Dryland Organic Wheat

Deakin, Michael D.

9
claims
20
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Producers of dryland organic wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the western USA struggle to maintain adequate soil fertility due to the high cost of organic fertilizers and concerns over moisture use of cover crops. Low soil fertility results in decreased wheat yield and quality, and increased year-to-year variability in yield and quality based on weather. This study was conducted to measure the effects of, and interactions between, cover crop mixes and a one-time compost application on soil health and winter wheat yield and quality. The study was located on three adjacent certified organic wheat farms near Snowville, UT, each with a calcareous silt loam soil under conventional tillage in a wheat-fallow system. Four composted steer manure treatments (0, 12.5, 25, and 50 Mg ha-1) and three cover crop treatments (oat [Avena sativa]- pea [Pisum sativum] mixture, vetch [Vicia villosa]- pea mixture, and a mechanically tilled fallow control) were evaluated from fall 2014 to 2017. Treatments were arranged in a randomized complete block split-split plot with three replications, with each farm hosting a single replicate. In 2015, the oat-pea cover crop treatment decreased grain yield, while compost amendment caused yields to more than double. However, neither compost nor cover crops affected yield in 2017. The 2015 crop year was much drier than 2017, suggesting that grain yield and quality benefits may be dependent on other factors such as the precipitation patterns of a particular year. The vetch-pea cover crop treatment increased total soil N in 2017 only, and compost amendment increased nitrogen fixation in the vetch-pea cover crop in that year. Compost treatments increased soil N, P, K, and organic C, both years without affecting soil EC or pH long-term. Nitrogen fixing cover crops may be a viable option for producers to increase soil N when sufficient soil moisture is present, however may be detrimental in a dry year. Compost amendment was shown to increase soil nutrition for multiple years, although that may only translate into increased grain yield when prerequisite weather conditions are present.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The oat-pea cover crop treatment decreased grain yield in 2015.

Treatment
oat-pea cover crop treatmente2
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
decreasede2
Qualifier
In 2015e2
Comparator
mechanically tilled fallow controle3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“dryland organic wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–57 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 2015, the oat-pea cover crop treatment decreased grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1190 · show in text ↑
e3

“a mechanically tilled fallow control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 909–945 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost amendment more than doubled wheat grain yield in 2015.

Treatment
compost amendmente4
Outcome
yieldse4
Direction
more than doublee4
Qualifier
In 2015e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“dryland organic wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–57 · show in text ↑
e2

“In 2015, the oat-pea cover crop treatment decreased grain yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1127–1190 · show in text ↑
e4

“while compost amendment caused yields to more than double”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1192–1249 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neither compost nor cover crops affected grain yield in 2017.

Treatment
compost nor cover cropse5
Outcome
yielde5
Direction
affectede5
Qualifier
in 2017e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“dryland organic wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–57 · show in text ↑
e5

“However, neither compost nor cover crops affected yield in 2017”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1251–1314 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The vetch-pea cover crop treatment increased total soil N in 2017 only.

Treatment
vetch-pea cover crop treatmente6
Outcome
total soil Ne6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
in 2017 onlye6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“dryland organic wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–57 · show in text ↑
e6

“The vetch-pea cover crop treatment increased total soil N in 2017 only”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1501–1571 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost amendment increased nitrogen fixation in the vetch-pea cover crop in 2017.

Material
vetch-pea cover crope7
Treatment
compost amendmente7
Outcome
nitrogen fixatione7
Direction
increasede7
Qualifier
in that yeare7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“dryland organic wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–57 · show in text ↑
e7

“compost amendment increased nitrogen fixation in the vetch-pea cover crop in that year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1663 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost treatments increased soil N, P and K in both years.

Treatment
Compost treatmentse6
Outcome
soil N, P, Ke6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
both yearse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“dryland organic wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–57 · show in text ↑
e6

“Compost treatments increased soil N, P, K, and organic C, both years without affecting soil EC or pH long-term”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1665–1775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost treatments increased soil organic C in both years.

Treatment
Compost treatmentse6
Outcome
organic Ce6
Direction
increasede6
Qualifier
both yearse6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“dryland organic wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–57 · show in text ↑
e6

“Compost treatments increased soil N, P, K, and organic C, both years without affecting soil EC or pH long-term”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1665–1775 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Compost treatments did not affect soil EC or pH in the long term.

Treatment
Compost treatmentse6
Outcome
soil EC or pHe6
Direction
without affectinge6
Qualifier
long-terme6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“dryland organic wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–57 · show in text ↑
e6

“Compost treatments increased soil N, P, K, and organic C, both years without affecting soil EC or pH long-term”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1665–1775 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen fixing cover crops may be a viable way to increase soil N when soil moisture is sufficient, but may be detrimental in a dry year.

Treatment
Nitrogen fixing cover cropse7
Outcome
increase soil Ne7
Qualifier
when sufficient soil moisture is presente7

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“dryland organic wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 13–57 · show in text ↑
e7

“Nitrogen fixing cover crops may be a viable option for producers to increase soil N when sufficient soil moisture is present, however may be detrimental in a dry year”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1777–1943 · show in text ↑

cover crop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

35 papers: 18 positive, 17 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

31 papers more in this group

See all 35 papers →

fertilization · symbiosis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

fertilization · soil: chemistry · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

214 papers: 190 positive, 24 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 190 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

210 papers more in this group

See all 214 papers →

other · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

223 papers: 206 positive, 17 negative or no effect

205 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

219 papers more in this group

See all 223 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

959 papers: 854 positive, 105 negative or no effect

853 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

955 papers more in this group

See all 959 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.