Paper · 2021 · Agronomy

Utilization Efficiency of Growth Regulators in Wheat under Drought Stress and Sandy Soil Conditions

Fathy M. A. El-Saadony; Yasser S. A. Mazrou; Ahmed E. A. Khalaf; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
15
citations
5
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Drought stress and nutrient status are highly important for plant growth and productivity. Two field experiments were conducted during two consecutive seasons (2017–2018 and 2018–2019) at El-Molak, Abo-Hammad, Sharkia, Egypt. This work was conducted under sandy soil conditions to evaluate the effects of foliar application with growth regulators (PGRs) such as cycocel (CCC), applied at 0, 500, or 1000 mg L−1, and/or salicylic acid (SA), applied at 0, 0.05, or 0.1 mM on the productivity as well as improving drought tolerance of three wheat cultivars, i.e., Gemmeiza 11, Misr 1, and Giza 171 under three irrigation intervals, i.e., 10, 15, and 20 days. Foliar spray was given at 35 and 50 days after planting (DAP). The obtained results showed that mean squares as a result of the main effect and first- and second-order interactions were significant (p ≤ 0.01) for all studied traits. The application of SA increased total chlorophyll content and flag leaf area (cm2) while the number of days to 50% heading was decreased; however, the number of spikes m−2, protein and proline contents were increased with the application of CCC. The cultivar Misr 1 outperformed the other cultivars in the most studied traits. Estimates of heritability in the broad sense (h2b) were, on average, higher in five physiological traits than other agronomic traits, and the highest estimate of h2b (95.1%) was shown by the number of days to 50% heading followed by protein content (91.90%). Among the interactions between irrigation and growth regulators, the I(10) × SA(0.1) recorded the highest flag leaf area (cm2), SPAD value, number of grains spike−1, 1000-grain weight (g), and grain yield (t ha−1). Among the interactions between irrigation and cultivars, the I(10) × Misr 1 recorded the highest flag leaf area (cm2), SPAD value, number of grains spike−1, and grain yield (t ha−1). Among the interactions among irrigation, growth regulators and cultivars, the I(10) × SA(0.1) × Misr 1 recorded the highest flag leaf area (cm2), number of grains spike−1, 1000-grain weight (g), and grain yield (t ha−1). Correlation coefficient between grain yield (t ha−1) and each of the number of days to 50% heading, flag leaf area, total chlorophyll content, number of spikes m−2, number of grains spike−1, and 1000-grain weight was positive and significant. Three main factors for the studied variables were created from the application of the factor analysis technique. Grain yield ha−1 (Y) can be predicted by the method of forwarding stepwise through applying the automatic linear regression analysis. Besides, the best prediction equation of grain yield ha−1 (Y) was formulated as: Ỷ = −14.36 + 0.11 number of grains spike−1 (NGS) + 0.09 1000-grain weight (THW) + 0.04 number of spike m−2 (NSm) + 0.03 days to 50% heading (DF) + 0.02 total chlorophyll content (TC) with adjusted-R2 (87.33%).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Main effects and interactions were significant for all studied traits.

Outcome
all studied traitse0
Value
p ≤ 0.01e0

Not reportedDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“mean squares as a result of the main effect and first- and second-order interactions were significant (p ≤ 0.01) for all studied traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 752–888 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid increased total chlorophyll content and flag leaf area.

Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
total chlorophyll content and flag leaf areae0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of SA increased total chlorophyll content and flag leaf area (cm2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Salicylic acid decreased days to 50% heading.

Treatment
SAe0
Outcome
number of days to 50% headinge0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The application of SA increased total chlorophyll content and flag leaf area (cm2) while the number of days to 50% heading was decreased”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 889–1025 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycocel increased the number of spikes per square metre.

Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
number of spikes m−2e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of spikes m−2, protein and proline contents were increased with the application of CCC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycocel increased protein content.

Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
proteine0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of spikes m−2, protein and proline contents were increased with the application of CCC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycocel increased proline content.

Treatment
CCCe0
Outcome
proline contentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the number of spikes m−2, protein and proline contents were increased with the application of CCC.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1036–1134 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Misr 1 outperformed the other cultivars for most traits.

Material
Misr 1e0
Outcome
most studied traitse0
Direction
outperformede0
Comparator
other cultivarse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The cultivar Misr 1 outperformed the other cultivars in the most studied traits.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1135–1215 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Broad-sense heritability averaged higher for five physiological traits than agronomic traits.

Outcome
heritability in the broad sense (h2b)e0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
other agronomic traitse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Estimates of heritability in the broad sense (h2b) were, on average, higher in five physiological traits than other agronomic traits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1216–1348 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Days to 50% heading had the highest broad-sense heritability, 95.1%.

Organ / stage
headinge0
Outcome
h2be0
Direction
higheste0
Value
95.1%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the highest estimate of h2b (95.1%) was shown by the number of days to 50% heading”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1354–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein content had a broad-sense heritability of 91.90%.

Outcome
protein contente0
Value
91.90%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by protein content (91.90%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1437–1474 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The I(10) × SA(0.1) interaction gave the highest flag leaf area, SPAD value and yield components.

Treatment
I(10) × SA(0.1)e0
Outcome
flag leaf area (cm2), SPAD value, number of grains spike−1e0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the I(10) × SA(0.1) recorded the highest flag leaf area (cm2), SPAD value, number of grains spike−1, 1000-grain weight (g), and grain yield (t ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1540–1689 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The I(10) × Misr 1 interaction gave the highest flag leaf area, SPAD value, grains per spike and grain yield.

Material
Misr 1e0
Outcome
flag leaf area (cm2), SPAD value, number of grains spike−1e0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the I(10) × Misr 1 recorded the highest flag leaf area (cm2), SPAD value, number of grains spike−1, and grain yield (t ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1747–1872 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The I(10) × SA(0.1) × Misr 1 interaction gave the highest flag leaf area, grains per spike, grain weight and yield.

Material
Misr 1e0
Outcome
flag leaf area (cm2), number of grains spike−1e0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the I(10) × SA(0.1) × Misr 1 recorded the highest flag leaf area (cm2), number of grains spike−1, 1000-grain weight (g), and grain yield (t ha−1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1947–2093 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was positively and significantly correlated with heading time, flag leaf area and chlorophyll content.

Organ / stage
flag leafe0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
positivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Correlation coefficient between grain yield (t ha−1) and each of the number of days to 50% heading, flag leaf area, total chlorophyll content, number of spikes m−2, number of grains spike−1, and 1000-grain weight was positive and significant.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2094–2336 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Factor analysis produced three main factors for the studied variables.

Outcome
main factorse0
Value
Three main factorse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Three main factors for the studied variables were created from the application of the factor analysis technique.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2337–2449 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑
Method / resourceobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

A stepwise regression equation predicted grain yield with adjusted R2 of 87.33%.

Outcome
prediction equation of grain yield ha−1e0
Value
87.33%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the best prediction equation of grain yield ha−1 (Y) was formulated as: Ỷ = −14.36 + 0.11 number of grains spike−1 (NGS) + 0.09 1000-grain weight (THW) + 0.04 number of spike m−2 (NSm) + 0.03 days to 50% heading (DF) + 0.02 total chlorophyll content (TC) with adjusted-R2 (87.33%).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2593–2874 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 47–52 · show in text ↑

chlormequat chloride · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

chlormequat chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

71 papers: 53 positive, 18 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

salicylic acid · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

30 papers: 29 positive, 1 negative or no effect

28 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

26 papers more in this group

See all 30 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.