Paper · 2016 · Current Trends in Biotechnology and Pharmacy

Sorbitol and Sucrose-Induced Osmotic Stress on Growth of Wheat Callus and Plantlet Regeneration

Vinay Kumar Mishra; Ram Singh

6
claims
12
verbatim quotes
2
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Scutellar somatic embryos are most commonly used as a target tissue for transformation and regeneration of transgenic wheat plants. Tissue culture responsiveness of elite varieties of wheat is one of the critical factors limiting high-frequency transformation. This study investigated the influence of sorbitol and sucroseinduced osmotic stress on growth and plantlet regeneration in callus cultures of wheat (Triticum aestivum L. em Thell). Immature embryos, at early-medium milking stages, of field grown wheat cvs., HUW206, HUW234, Sonalika and HD2009, were induced to form the callus on MS medium supplemented with 2, 4-D and 3% sucrose alone/or in a combination of sucrose and sorbitol. Fresh weight of callus was significantly promoted when 1.5% (w/v) sorbitol was added to the MS medium in conjunction with 3% (w/v) sucrose. However, higher concentration of sorbitol concentration (3% w/v) in conjunction with 3% (w/v) sucrose did not further improve fresh weight. Sorbitol in combination with sucrose caused a decrease in the water content from calli and promoted embryogenic callus formation. After 4 weeks, a high frequency (10–25%) shoot formation was obtained on MS media, IAA 1 mgL1 and zeatin 1 mgL−1 in supplementation with sucrose and sorbitol. However, optimum plantlet regeneration (45–65%) was found on subsequent subculture on regeneration media containing 3% (w/v) sucrose and 3% (w/v) sorbitol. Osmotic stress induced by the combination of sucrose and sorbitol is beneficial for embryogenecity of the friable calli and high-frequency plantlet regeneration.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Adding 1.5% sorbitol to 3% sucrose significantly increased callus fresh weight.

Organ / stage
calluse0
Treatment
1.5% (w/v) sorbitole0
Outcome
Fresh weight of calluse0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fresh weight of callus was significantly promoted when 1.5% (w/v) sorbitol was added to the MS medium in conjunction with 3% (w/v) sucrose.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 692–831 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Three percent sorbitol with 3% sucrose did not further improve callus fresh weight.

Treatment
sorbitol concentration (3% w/v) in conjunction with 3% (w/v) sucrosee0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
did not further improvee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“higher concentration of sorbitol concentration (3% w/v) in conjunction with 3% (w/v) sucrose did not further improve fresh weight.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 841–971 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorbitol with sucrose decreased callus water content.

Treatment
Sorbitol in combination with sucrosee0
Outcome
water content from callie0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorbitol in combination with sucrose caused a decrease in the water content from calli”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1058 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sorbitol with sucrose promoted embryogenic callus formation.

Treatment
Sorbitol in combination with sucrosee0
Outcome
embryogenic callus formatione0
Direction
promotede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Sorbitol in combination with sucrose caused a decrease in the water content from calli and promoted embryogenic callus formation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1101 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

After four weeks, supplemented medium yielded 10–25% shoot formation.

Treatment
sucrose and sorbitole0
Outcome
shoot formatione0
Value
10–25%e0
Qualifier
After 4 weekse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“After 4 weeks, a high frequency (10–25%) shoot formation was obtained on MS media, IAA 1 mgL1 and zeatin 1 mgL−1 in supplementation with sucrose and sorbitol.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1102–1260 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Subculture with 3% sucrose and 3% sorbitol gave optimum regeneration of 45–65%.

Treatment
3% (w/v) sucrose and 3% (w/v) sorbitole0
Outcome
plantlet regeneratione0
Direction
optimume0
Value
45–65%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“optimum plantlet regeneration (45–65%) was found on subsequent subculture on regeneration media containing 3% (w/v) sucrose and 3% (w/v) sorbitol.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1270–1416 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 57–62 · show in text ↑

sucrose · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

glucitol · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

sucrose · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.