Paper · 2002 · Agronomy Journal

Establishment of Wheat Seedlings after Early Sowing and Germination in an Arid Mediterranean Environment

Joshua D. Klein; Israel Mufradi; Shlomo Cohen; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Seedling establishment of dryland crops in semiarid and arid zones is limited by precipitation. Spring wheat (Triticum aestivum L. emend. Thell.) generally is sown in dry soil in the dryland regions of Israel before the rainy season starts. We compared the effects of no-tillage, conventional tillage, and plant growth regulators on wheat seedling growth to identify the optimal crop management system for seedling establishment in dryland farming. Experiments were conducted during 1998 and 1999 at the Gilat Experimental Station located in southern Israel (annual precipitation of 222 and 72 mm for 1998 and 1999, respectively; soil type is sandy loam loess—Torrifluvents). Neither inhibitors of gibberellin synthesis (chlorocoline chloride, paclobutrazol, and trinexapac-ethyl) nor monopotassium phosphate (KH2PO4) enhanced seedling survival under drought stress when sprayed on seedlings at the two-leaf stage. No-tillage led to increases in water content in the upper (0–30 cm) soil layer and in seedling water content and seedling biomass. No-tillage management also maintained seedling viability compared with the control, with seedlings surviving as long as 35 d without precipitation. No-tillage management allows successful seedling establishment and growth after a dry period that follows germination.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellin synthesis inhibitors did not enhance seedling survival under drought stress.

Organ / stage
two-leaf stagee0
Treatment
inhibitors of gibberellin synthesis (chlorocoline chloride, paclobutrazol, and trinexapac-ethyl)e0
Outcome
seedling survivale0
Direction
Neithere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Neither inhibitors of gibberellin synthesis (chlorocoline chloride, paclobutrazol, and trinexapac-ethyl) nor monopotassium phosphate (KH2PO4) enhanced seedling survival under drought stress when sprayed on seedlings at the two-leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 676–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Monopotassium phosphate did not enhance seedling survival under drought stress.

Treatment
monopotassium phosphate (KH2PO4)e0
Outcome
seedling survivale0
Direction
nore0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nor monopotassium phosphate (KH2PO4) enhanced seedling survival under drought stress when sprayed on seedlings at the two-leaf stage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 781–913 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage increased upper soil layer water content.

Treatment
No-tillagee0
Outcome
water content in the upper (0–30 cm) soil layere0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No-tillage led to increases in water content in the upper (0–30 cm) soil layer”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–993 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage increased seedling water content and biomass.

Treatment
No-tillagee0
Outcome
seedling water content and seedling biomasse0
Direction
increasese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No-tillage led to increases in water content in the upper (0–30 cm) soil layer and in seedling water content and seedling biomass”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–1044 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–32 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

No-tillage maintained seedling viability relative to the control for up to 35 days without precipitation.

Treatment
No-tillage managemente0
Outcome
seedling viabilitye0
Direction
maintainede0
Value
35 de0
Comparator
the controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“No-tillage management also maintained seedling viability compared with the control, with seedlings surviving as long as 35 d without precipitation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1046–1192 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat Seedlings”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 17–32 · show in text ↑

paclobutrazol · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

18 papers: 9 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

trinexapac-ethyl · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 4 positive, 9 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
    Only trinexapac-ethyl and chlormequat reduced wheat plant height, relative to the control without retardant.

    Use of growth retardants in wheat · 2009 · compared with control treatment without growth retardant application

    Opposite direction

  2. positive
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

chloride · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

potassium dihydrogen phosphate · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 0 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

class · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

109 papers: 95 positive, 14 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 95 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

105 papers more in this group

See all 109 papers →

tillage · soil: physics · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

142 papers: 118 positive, 24 negative or no effect

117 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

138 papers more in this group

See all 142 papers →

tillage · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

267 papers: 208 positive, 59 negative or no effect

207 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

263 papers more in this group

See all 267 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.