Paper · 1973 · Journal of the American Society for Horticultural Science

Foliage Canopy Development of ‘Mcintosh’ Apple Hedgerows in Relation to Mechanical Pruning, the Interception of Solar Radiation, and Fruiting1

John C. Cain

6
claims
15
verbatim quotes
27
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Abstract The percentage of solar radiation passing through the foliage canopy of ‘Mcintosh’ hedgerows, A) pruned annually by cutterbar and B) pruned by slotting saw, was measured continuously from pre-bloom until the completion of foliage growth in late July. Assuming the spur leaf canopy (Sp), emerges first and virtually completes growth before the shoot leaf canopy (Sh), emerges, the relative extent of Sp and Sh, and their respective interception of radiation is calculated at approximately 4-day intervals during the growing season. Even though A produced more total foliage and intercepted more total radiation, the spurs of B produced more flowers and more fruit. Spur leaf canopy B intercepted more solar radiation because of less shading by Sh. The maximum ratio Sh/Sp for adequate illumination of Sp is estimated to be about .8. The relative importance of sunlight on Sp and the time of interception of light during the growing season in relation to flower bud initiation and fruit development are discussed.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutterbar pruned hedgerows produced more total foliage than slotting saw pruned hedgerows.

Material
‘Mcintosh’t0
Treatment
Ae0
Outcome
total foliagee0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Be0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Even though A produced more total foliage and intercepted more total radiation, the spurs of B produced more flowers and more fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Mcintosh’ Apple Hedgerows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–56 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cutterbar pruned hedgerows intercepted more total radiation than slotting saw pruned hedgerows.

Material
‘Mcintosh’t0
Treatment
Ae0
Outcome
total radiatione0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Be1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A produced more total foliage and intercepted more total radiation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 552–618 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Mcintosh’ Apple Hedgerows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“the spurs of B produced more flowers and more fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–671 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slotting saw pruned hedgerow spurs produced more flowers than cutterbar pruned spurs.

Material
‘Mcintosh’t0
Treatment
Be0
Outcome
flowerse0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Ae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spurs of B produced more flowers and more fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Mcintosh’ Apple Hedgerows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Even though A produced more total foliage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–581 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slotting saw pruned hedgerow spurs produced more fruit than cutterbar pruned spurs.

Material
‘Mcintosh’t0
Treatment
Be0
Outcome
fruite0
Direction
moree0
Comparator
Ae1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the spurs of B produced more flowers and more fruit”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–671 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Mcintosh’ Apple Hedgerows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–56 · show in text ↑
e1

“Even though A produced more total foliage”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 540–581 · show in text ↑
Mechanismobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Slotting saw spur leaf canopy intercepted more solar radiation because shoot leaf canopy shaded it less.

Material
‘Mcintosh’t0
Organ / stage
Spur leaf canopye0
Outcome
solar radiatione0
Direction
moree0
Qualifier
less shading by She0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spur leaf canopy B intercepted more solar radiation because of less shading by Sh”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 673–754 · show in text ↑
t0

“‘Mcintosh’ Apple Hedgerows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 30–56 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultsimulated

Claim · model-written summary

The estimated maximum shoot to spur leaf canopy ratio for adequate spur illumination was about .8.

Outcome
maximum ratio Sh/Spe0
Value
about .8e0
Qualifier
adequate illumination of Spe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Malus domestica
Malus domestica · TaxonW.carter · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The maximum ratio Sh/Sp for adequate illumination of Sp is estimated to be about .8”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 756–839 · show in text ↑
t0

“Apple Hedgerows”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 41–56 · show in text ↑

boron atom · phenology · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

boron atom · yield · Malus domestica (apple)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 13 positive, 4 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.