Paper · 2022 · Agriculture

Phytotoxic Effects of Senna garrettiana and Identification of Phytotoxic Substances for the Development of Bioherbicides

Ramida Krumsri; Arihiro Iwasaki; Kiyotake Suenaga; et al.

12
claims
14
verbatim quotes
10
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Phytotoxic substances in plants that may serve as alternative natural herbicides for controlling weeds are required for sustainable agriculture. We explored the phytotoxic activities of aqueous methanol extracts of Senna garrettiana (Craib) Irwin & Barneby leaves and the active substances they contain. The results revealed that the S. garrettiana leaf extracts had significant phytotoxic effects on three dicotyledons (Lepidium sativum L., Lactuca sativa L., and Medicago sativa L.) and two monocotyledons (Phleum pratense L. and Lolium multiflorum Lam.). An bioassay-guided isolation process yielded three active substances; caffeic acid, methyl caffeate, and (S)-6-hydroxymellein inhibited the seed germination, seedling growth, and biomass accumulation of L. sativum in a concentration-dependent manner. Based on the concentration required for 50% growth inhibition (IC50), (S)-6-hydroxymellein had the highest inhibitory effects on L. sativum in all test parameters, followed by methyl caffeate and caffeic acid. The L. sativum roots were the most susceptible to (S)-6-hydroxymellein (IC50 = 383 µM) and caffeic acid (IC50 = 2627 µM), whereas methyl caffeate (IC50 = 1361 µM) had the greatest effect on the L. sativum shoots. Thus, three isolated compounds may explain the phytotoxic effects of the S. garrettiana extracts. Consequently, caffeic acid, methyl caffeate, and (S)-6-hydroxymellein could be potential candidates for the future production of bioherbicides.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S. garrettiana leaf extracts had significant phytotoxic effects on Lepidium sativum, Lactuca sativa and Medicago sativa.

Taxon
Lepidium sativum L., Lactuca sativa L., and Medicago sativa L.Medicago sativaLactuca sativaLepidium sativume1
Treatment
S. garrettiana leaf extractse1
Outcome
phytotoxic effectse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Medicago sativa
Medicago sativa · TaxonDrepanostoma · CC BY 4.0 · iNaturalist ↗
Lactuca sativa
Lactuca sativa · Taxonen:User:Geographer · CC BY 1.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Lepidium sativum
Lepidium sativum · TaxonVikiçizer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the S. garrettiana leaf extracts had significant phytotoxic effects on three dicotyledons (Lepidium sativum L., Lactuca sativa L., and Medicago sativa L.) and two monocotyledons (Phleum pratense L. and Lolium multiflorum Lam.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

S. garrettiana leaf extracts had significant phytotoxic effects on Phleum pratense and Lolium multiflorum.

Taxon
Phleum pratense L. and Lolium multiflorum Lam.Lolium multiflorumPhleum pratensee1
Treatment
S. garrettiana leaf extractse1
Outcome
phytotoxic effectse1

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lolium multiflorum
Lolium multiflorum · TaxonKristian Peters -- Fabelfroh 09:38, 2 January 2007 (UTC) · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Phleum pratense
Phleum pratense · TaxonAnRo0002 · CC0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“the S. garrettiana leaf extracts had significant phytotoxic effects on three dicotyledons (Lepidium sativum L., Lactuca sativa L., and Medicago sativa L.) and two monocotyledons (Phleum pratense L. and Lolium multiflorum Lam.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 330–556 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Caffeic acid inhibited seed germination, seedling growth and biomass accumulation of L. sativum in a concentration-dependent manner.

Taxon
L. sativumLepidium sativume2
Treatment
caffeic acide2
Outcome
seed germination, seedling growth, and biomass accumulatione2
Direction
inhibitede2
Qualifier
in a concentration-dependent mannere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lepidium sativum
Lepidium sativum · TaxonVikiçizer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“caffeic acid, methyl caffeate, and (S)-6-hydroxymellein inhibited the seed germination, seedling growth, and biomass accumulation of L. sativum in a concentration-dependent manner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl caffeate inhibited seed germination, seedling growth and biomass accumulation of L. sativum in a concentration-dependent manner.

Taxon
L. sativumLepidium sativume2
Treatment
methyl caffeatee2
Outcome
seed germination, seedling growth, and biomass accumulatione2
Direction
inhibitede2
Qualifier
in a concentration-dependent mannere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lepidium sativum
Lepidium sativum · TaxonVikiçizer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“caffeic acid, methyl caffeate, and (S)-6-hydroxymellein inhibited the seed germination, seedling growth, and biomass accumulation of L. sativum in a concentration-dependent manner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

(S)-6-hydroxymellein inhibited seed germination, seedling growth and biomass accumulation of L. sativum in a concentration-dependent manner.

Taxon
L. sativumLepidium sativume2
Treatment
(S)-6-hydroxymelleine2
Outcome
seed germination, seedling growth, and biomass accumulatione2
Direction
inhibitede2
Qualifier
in a concentration-dependent mannere2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lepidium sativum
Lepidium sativum · TaxonVikiçizer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e2

“caffeic acid, methyl caffeate, and (S)-6-hydroxymellein inhibited the seed germination, seedling growth, and biomass accumulation of L. sativum in a concentration-dependent manner”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 628–807 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

(S)-6-hydroxymellein had the highest inhibitory effects on L. sativum among the three compounds.

Taxon
L. sativumLepidium sativume3
Treatment
(S)-6-hydroxymelleine3
Outcome
inhibitory effectse3
Direction
higheste3
Comparator
methyl caffeate and caffeic acide3

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lepidium sativum
Lepidium sativum · TaxonVikiçizer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“(S)-6-hydroxymellein had the highest inhibitory effects on L. sativum in all test parameters, followed by methyl caffeate and caffeic acid”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 879–1017 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. sativum roots were the most susceptible to (S)-6-hydroxymellein, compared with caffeic acid.

Taxon
L. sativumLepidium sativume4
Organ / stage
rootse4
Treatment
(S)-6-hydroxymelleine4
Outcome
most susceptiblee4
Direction
most susceptiblee4
Value
IC50 = 383 µMe4
Comparator
caffeic acide4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lepidium sativum
Lepidium sativum · TaxonVikiçizer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The L. sativum roots were the most susceptible to (S)-6-hydroxymellein (IC50 = 383 µM) and caffeic acid (IC50 = 2627 µM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

L. sativum roots were the most susceptible to caffeic acid, compared with (S)-6-hydroxymellein.

Taxon
L. sativumLepidium sativume4
Organ / stage
rootse4
Treatment
caffeic acide4
Outcome
most susceptiblee4
Direction
most susceptiblee4
Value
IC50 = 2627 µMe4
Comparator
(S)-6-hydroxymelleine4

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lepidium sativum
Lepidium sativum · TaxonVikiçizer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e4

“The L. sativum roots were the most susceptible to (S)-6-hydroxymellein (IC50 = 383 µM) and caffeic acid (IC50 = 2627 µM)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1019–1139 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Methyl caffeate had the greatest effect on L. sativum shoots.

Taxon
L. sativumLepidium sativume5
Organ / stage
shootse5
Treatment
methyl caffeatee5
Outcome
greatest effecte5
Direction
greateste5
Value
IC50 = 1361 µMe5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Lepidium sativum
Lepidium sativum · TaxonVikiçizer · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e5

“whereas methyl caffeate (IC50 = 1361 µM) had the greatest effect on the L. sativum shoots”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1141–1230 · show in text ↑
Mechanismhypothesisoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Three isolated compounds may explain the phytotoxic effects of the S. garrettiana extracts.

Taxon
S. garrettianaSenna garrettianae6
Outcome
phytotoxic effectse6
Qualifier
three isolated compoundse6

Verbatim

e6

“Thus, three isolated compounds may explain the phytotoxic effects of the S. garrettiana extracts”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1232–1328 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Bioassay-guided isolation yielded three active substances from S. garrettiana leaves.

Taxon
Senna garrettianaSenna garrettianae0
Outcome
active substancese7
Value
threee7

Verbatim

e0

“aqueous methanol extracts of Senna garrettiana (Craib) Irwin & Barneby leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–263 · show in text ↑
e7

“An bioassay-guided isolation process yielded three active substances”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 558–626 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultbasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Caffeic acid, methyl caffeate and (S)-6-hydroxymellein are potential candidates for future bioherbicide production.

Taxon
Senna garrettianaSenna garrettianae0
Outcome
potential candidates for the future production of bioherbicidese7

Verbatim

e0

“aqueous methanol extracts of Senna garrettiana (Craib) Irwin & Barneby leaves”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 186–263 · show in text ↑
e7

“caffeic acid, methyl caffeate, and (S)-6-hydroxymellein could be potential candidates for the future production of bioherbicides”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1344–1472 · show in text ↑

methyl caffeate · growth · Lepidium sativumPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

botanical · crop injury · Lepidium sativumPositive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

botanical · crop injury · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
See all 2 papers →

botanical · crop injury · Lactuca sativa (garden lettuce)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 6 positive, 15 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

botanical · crop injury · Lolium multiflorum (Italian ryegrass)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.