Paper · 2004 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

EFFECT OF WATER REGIME, NITROGEN LEVEL AND ZINC APPLICATION ON MAIZE YIELD AND ITS WATER RELATIONS

M.A. Ghazy

10
claims
14
verbatim quotes
4
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

A field experiments was carried out at Sakha Agric. Res. Sta. Farm during two successive summer seasons (2002 and 2003) to study the effects of water regime, nitrogen fertilizer levels and zinc application on maize yield and its water relations as well as some soil chemical properties. Split-split plot design with four replicates was used, where 4 water regime treatments (40%, 55%, 70% and 85% depletion of available soil moisture) were occupied the main plots. Nitrogen fertilizer with three levels (90, 110 and 130 kg N red' ) were placed in the sub-plots and three zinc treatments (150 ppm zinc-EDTA chelate as a foliar spray application, 10 kg fed' Zn- sulfate as soil application and without zinc applied) were allocated to sub-sub-plots. The main results could be summarized as follows: - There was a significant effect of water regime on maize yield and its components. Irrigation at 55% depletion of available soil moisture (12) produced the highest maize yield and its components. While the irrigation at 85% depletion of available soil moisture (14) gave the lowest maize yield. Increasing nitrogen fertilization level up to 130 kg ted' highly Significantly increased maize yield and its components. The foliar application of zinc produced the higher maize yield than the SOil applied zinc. - The highest amount of irrigation water applied and water consumptive use (WCU) were obtained with irrigation at 40% depletion of available soil moisture. While the irrigation at 85% depletion of available soil moisture gave the highest values of crop water use efficiency (CWUE). - Soil salinity (ECe), soluble ions and SAR were decreased with increasing the amount of irrigation water applied. On the other hand, decreasing the amount of irrigation water applied (14 Treat.) led to salts accumulation in the soil profile during both seasons. Generally, it could be concluded that increasing nitrogen fertilization level up to 130 kg tee" and irrigation at 55% depletion of available soil moisture with 150 ppm foliar spray of zinc gave the highest maize yield and its components

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation regime significantly affected maize yield and components.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
water regimee0
Outcome
maize yield and its componentse0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was a significant effect of water regime on maize yield and its components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 798–879 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 55% moisture depletion produced the highest maize yield and components.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
55% depletion of available soil moisturee0
Outcome
highest maize yield and its componentse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Irrigation at 55% depletion of available soil moisture (12) produced the highest maize yield and its components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 880–992 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 85% depletion gave the lowest maize yield.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
85% depletion of available soil moisturee0
Outcome
lowest maize yielde0
Direction
loweste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the irrigation at 85% depletion of available soil moisture (14) gave the lowest maize yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 999–1091 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing nitrogen up to 130 kg increased maize yield and components significantly.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
nitrogen fertilization level up to 130 kg ted'e0
Outcome
maize yield and its componentse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Increasing nitrogen fertilization level up to 130 kg ted' highly Significantly increased maize yield and its components.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1092–1212 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar zinc produced higher maize yield than soil zinc.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
foliar application of zince0
Outcome
maize yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
SOil applied zince0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The foliar application of zinc produced the higher maize yield than the SOil applied zinc.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1213–1303 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 40% depletion had the highest irrigation water amount and WCU.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
irrigation at 40% depletion of available soil moisturee0
Outcome
water consumptive use (WCU)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest amount of irrigation water applied and water consumptive use (WCU) were obtained with irrigation at 40% depletion of available soil moisture.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1306–1459 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation at 85% depletion gave the highest crop water use efficiency.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
irrigation at 85% depletion of available soil moisturee0
Outcome
crop water use efficiency (CWUE)e0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the irrigation at 85% depletion of available soil moisture gave the highest values of crop water use efficiency (CWUE).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1466–1585 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Greater applied irrigation decreased soil salinity, soluble ions and SAR.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
increasing the amount of irrigation water appliede0
Outcome
Soil salinity (ECe), soluble ions and SARe0
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Soil salinity (ECe), soluble ions and SAR were decreased with increasing the amount of irrigation water applied.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1588–1700 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Reduced irrigation accumulated salts in the soil profile.

Taxon
maizeZea mayst0
Treatment
decreasing the amount of irrigation water appliede0
Outcome
salts accumulation in the soil profilee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“decreasing the amount of irrigation water applied (14 Treat.) led to salts accumulation in the soil profile during both seasons.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1720–1848 · show in text ↑
t0

“MAIZE”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest maize yield resulted from 130 kg nitrogen, irrigation at 55% depletion and foliar zinc.

Taxon
maizeZea mayse0
Treatment
irrigation at 55% depletion of available soil moisture with 150 ppm foliar spray of zince0
Outcome
highest maize yield and its componentse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Zea mays
Zea mays · TaxonAkwugo · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing nitrogen fertilization level up to 130 kg tee" and irrigation at 55% depletion of available soil moisture with 150 ppm foliar spray of zinc gave the highest maize yield and its components”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1887–2085 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

irrigation · soil: chemistry · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

16 papers: 9 positive, 7 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

12 papers more in this group

See all 16 papers →

soil water · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

irrigation · molecular: metabolites · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 14 positive, 11 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

soil water · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

64 papers: 42 positive, 22 negative or no effect

41 papers in the same direction as this paper · 20 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

60 papers more in this group

See all 64 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

324 papers: 284 positive, 40 negative or no effect

283 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

320 papers more in this group

See all 324 papers →

application · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

629 papers: 575 positive, 54 negative or no effect

574 papers in the same direction as this paper · 42 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

625 papers more in this group

See all 629 papers →

irrigation · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

1,016 papers: 791 positive, 225 negative or no effect

790 papers in the same direction as this paper · 209 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

1,012 papers more in this group

See all 1,016 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.