Abstract
Two field experiments were conducted during two successive early summer seasons of 2003 and 2004 on a sandy soil of El-Gsbeel farms, South Sinai. Egypt. to evaluate the effect of using the regional high salinity groundwater from representative wells (WQ 1 = 0.88 dS/m as cntrol, WQ2= 1.90. WQ3= 3.98. WQ4= 6.20. WQS; 10.00 dS/m) in surface drip (SO) and subsurface drip (SSD) irrigation of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill .. cv. GS) . Tomato rooting depth, shoot weight, fruit weight. fruit height, and fruit diameter significantly decreased with increasing salinity of the irrigation water relative to the control (WQ1). The reductions were about 16.3, 19.4, 25.8, and 58.1 % tor root length, respectively; while the corresponding reductions were 4.4,8.7,44.0. and 69.1% for shoot weight; and 16.9, 25.9. 55.9, and 64% for fruit fresh weight. Fruit height and fruit diameter exhibited a similar trend but in a Jesser magnitudes. On the other hand. fruit total soluble solids (TSS) and vitamin C concentrations significantly increased with increasing salinity and were attributed to the reduction in fruit dry weights. Subsurface drip irrigation (20 cm below bed surface) significantly increased rooting depth and shoot weight compared to the SD one. Simple correlation coefficients among the studied parameters revealed that fruit weight or fruit size were significantly and positively correlated with root length and shoot weight and negatively with irrigation water salinity.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing irrigation water salinity reduced tomato root length by 16.3, 19.4, 25.8 and 58.1% relative to WQ1.
- Taxon
- Tomato
Solanum lycopersicume0 - Treatment
- increasing salinity of the irrigation watere0
- Outcome
- root lengthe0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 16.3, 19.4, 25.8, and 58.1 %e0
- Comparator
- the control (WQ1)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Tomato rooting depth, shoot weight, fruit weight. fruit height, and fruit diameter significantly decreased with increasing salinity of the irrigation water relative to the control (WQ1). The reductions were about 16.3, 19.4, 25.8, and 58.1 % tor root length, respectively”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing irrigation water salinity reduced tomato shoot weight by 4.4, 8.7, 44.0 and 69.1%.
- Taxon
- TOMATO
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- increasing salinity of the irrigation watere0
- Outcome
- shoot weighte0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 4.4,8.7,44.0. and 69.1%e0
- Comparator
- the control (WQ1)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“significantly decreased with increasing salinity of the irrigation water relative to the control (WQ1). The reductions were about 16.3, 19.4, 25.8, and 58.1 % tor root length, respectively; while the corresponding reductions were 4.4,8.7,44.0. and 69.1% for shoot weight”
t0“TOMATO”
Claim · model-written summary
Increasing irrigation water salinity reduced fruit fresh weight by 16.9, 25.9, 55.9 and 64%.
- Taxon
- TOMATO
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- increasing salinity of the irrigation watere0
- Outcome
- fruit fresh weighte0
- Direction
- decreasede0
- Value
- 16.9, 25.9. 55.9, and 64%e0
- Comparator
- the control (WQ1)e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“significantly decreased with increasing salinity of the irrigation water relative to the control (WQ1). The reductions were about 16.3, 19.4, 25.8, and 58.1 % tor root length, respectively; while the corresponding reductions were 4.4,8.7,44.0. and 69.1% for shoot weight; and 16.9, 25.9. 55.9, and 64% for fruit fresh weight”
t0“TOMATO”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit height decreased with salinity, with smaller reductions than the listed growth traits.
- Taxon
- TOMATO
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- increasing salinity of the irrigation watere1
- Outcome
- Fruit heighte0
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fruit height and fruit diameter exhibited a similar trend but in a Jesser magnitudes.”
e1“Tomato rooting depth, shoot weight, fruit weight. fruit height, and fruit diameter significantly decreased with increasing salinity of the irrigation water relative to the control (WQ1).”
t0“TOMATO”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit diameter decreased with salinity, with smaller reductions than the listed growth traits.
- Taxon
- TOMATO
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- increasing salinity of the irrigation watere1
- Outcome
- fruit diametere0
- Direction
- decreaseinferrede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Fruit height and fruit diameter exhibited a similar trend but in a Jesser magnitudes.”
e1“Tomato rooting depth, shoot weight, fruit weight. fruit height, and fruit diameter significantly decreased with increasing salinity of the irrigation water relative to the control (WQ1).”
t0“TOMATO”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit total soluble solids increased with salinity.
- Taxon
- TOMATO
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- increasing salinitye0
- Outcome
- fruit total soluble solids (TSS)e0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“fruit total soluble solids (TSS) and vitamin C concentrations significantly increased with increasing salinity”
t0“TOMATO”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit vitamin C concentrations increased with salinity.
- Taxon
- TOMATO
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- increasing salinitye0
- Outcome
- vitamin C concentrationse0
- Direction
- increasede0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“fruit total soluble solids (TSS) and vitamin C concentrations significantly increased with increasing salinity”
t0“TOMATO”
Claim · model-written summary
Subsurface drip irrigation increased rooting depth compared with surface drip.
- Taxon
- TOMATO
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Subsurface drip irrigation (20 cm below bed surface)e0
- Outcome
- rooting depthe0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- the SD onee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Subsurface drip irrigation (20 cm below bed surface) significantly increased rooting depth and shoot weight compared to the SD one.”
t0“TOMATO”
Claim · model-written summary
Subsurface drip irrigation increased shoot weight compared with surface drip.
- Taxon
- TOMATO
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- Subsurface drip irrigation (20 cm below bed surface)e0
- Outcome
- shoot weighte0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Comparator
- the SD onee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Subsurface drip irrigation (20 cm below bed surface) significantly increased rooting depth and shoot weight compared to the SD one.”
t0“TOMATO”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit weight and size correlated positively with root length and shoot weight.
- Taxon
- TOMATO
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Organ / stage
- roote0
- Outcome
- fruit weight or fruit sizee0
- Direction
- positively correlatede0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“fruit weight or fruit size were significantly and positively correlated with root length and shoot weight”
t0“TOMATO”
Claim · model-written summary
Fruit weight and size correlated negatively with irrigation water salinity.
- Taxon
- TOMATO
Solanum lycopersicumt0 - Treatment
- irrigation water salinitye0
- Outcome
- fruit weight or fruit sizee0
- Direction
- negativelye0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“fruit weight or fruit size were significantly and positively correlated with root length and shoot weight and negatively with irrigation water salinity.”
t0“TOMATO”
The same questions in other papers
salinity · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
29 papers more in this group
See all 33 papers →salinity · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ
43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
47 papers more in this group
See all 51 papers →salinity · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
156 papers more in this group
See all 160 papers →irrigation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 67 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
171 papers more in this group
See all 175 papers →salinity · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
260 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
296 papers more in this group
See all 300 papers →irrigation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results
104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 239 in the opposite direction
- positive
- positive
- positive
340 papers more in this group
See all 344 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.