Paper · 2005 · Journal of Plant Production

SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION METHODS AND W.~TER QUALITY EFFECT ON ROOT AND SHOOT GROWTH AND FRUIT QUALITY OF TOMATO

M. Nassr; E. EI-Absawy; A. Guirgls

11
claims
23
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted during two successive early summer seasons of 2003 and 2004 on a sandy soil of El-Gsbeel farms, South Sinai. Egypt. to evaluate the effect of using the regional high salinity groundwater from representative wells (WQ 1 = 0.88 dS/m as cntrol, WQ2= 1.90. WQ3= 3.98. WQ4= 6.20. WQS; 10.00 dS/m) in surface drip (SO) and subsurface drip (SSD) irrigation of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill .. cv. GS) . Tomato rooting depth, shoot weight, fruit weight. fruit height, and fruit diameter significantly decreased with increasing salinity of the irrigation water relative to the control (WQ1). The reductions were about 16.3, 19.4, 25.8, and 58.1 % tor root length, respectively; while the corresponding reductions were 4.4,8.7,44.0. and 69.1% for shoot weight; and 16.9, 25.9. 55.9, and 64% for fruit fresh weight. Fruit height and fruit diameter exhibited a similar trend but in a Jesser magnitudes. On the other hand. fruit total soluble solids (TSS) and vitamin C concentrations significantly increased with increasing salinity and were attributed to the reduction in fruit dry weights. Subsurface drip irrigation (20 cm below bed surface) significantly increased rooting depth and shoot weight compared to the SD one. Simple correlation coefficients among the studied parameters revealed that fruit weight or fruit size were significantly and positively correlated with root length and shoot weight and negatively with irrigation water salinity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 11

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation water salinity reduced tomato root length by 16.3, 19.4, 25.8 and 58.1% relative to WQ1.

Treatment
increasing salinity of the irrigation watere0
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
16.3, 19.4, 25.8, and 58.1 %e0
Comparator
the control (WQ1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato rooting depth, shoot weight, fruit weight. fruit height, and fruit diameter significantly decreased with increasing salinity of the irrigation water relative to the control (WQ1). The reductions were about 16.3, 19.4, 25.8, and 58.1 % tor root length, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–711 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation water salinity reduced tomato shoot weight by 4.4, 8.7, 44.0 and 69.1%.

Treatment
increasing salinity of the irrigation watere0
Outcome
shoot weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
4.4,8.7,44.0. and 69.1%e0
Comparator
the control (WQ1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly decreased with increasing salinity of the irrigation water relative to the control (WQ1). The reductions were about 16.3, 19.4, 25.8, and 58.1 % tor root length, respectively; while the corresponding reductions were 4.4,8.7,44.0. and 69.1% for shoot weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–793 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation water salinity reduced fruit fresh weight by 16.9, 25.9, 55.9 and 64%.

Treatment
increasing salinity of the irrigation watere0
Outcome
fruit fresh weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
16.9, 25.9. 55.9, and 64%e0
Comparator
the control (WQ1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“significantly decreased with increasing salinity of the irrigation water relative to the control (WQ1). The reductions were about 16.3, 19.4, 25.8, and 58.1 % tor root length, respectively; while the corresponding reductions were 4.4,8.7,44.0. and 69.1% for shoot weight; and 16.9, 25.9. 55.9, and 64% for fruit fresh weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 523–847 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit height decreased with salinity, with smaller reductions than the listed growth traits.

Treatment
increasing salinity of the irrigation watere1
Outcome
Fruit heighte0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit height and fruit diameter exhibited a similar trend but in a Jesser magnitudes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–934 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato rooting depth, shoot weight, fruit weight. fruit height, and fruit diameter significantly decreased with increasing salinity of the irrigation water relative to the control (WQ1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit diameter decreased with salinity, with smaller reductions than the listed growth traits.

Treatment
increasing salinity of the irrigation watere1
Outcome
fruit diametere0
Direction
decreaseinferrede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Fruit height and fruit diameter exhibited a similar trend but in a Jesser magnitudes.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 849–934 · show in text ↑
e1

“Tomato rooting depth, shoot weight, fruit weight. fruit height, and fruit diameter significantly decreased with increasing salinity of the irrigation water relative to the control (WQ1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–626 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit total soluble solids increased with salinity.

Treatment
increasing salinitye0
Outcome
fruit total soluble solids (TSS)e0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit total soluble solids (TSS) and vitamin C concentrations significantly increased with increasing salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit vitamin C concentrations increased with salinity.

Treatment
increasing salinitye0
Outcome
vitamin C concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit total soluble solids (TSS) and vitamin C concentrations significantly increased with increasing salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface drip irrigation increased rooting depth compared with surface drip.

Treatment
Subsurface drip irrigation (20 cm below bed surface)e0
Outcome
rooting depthe0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the SD onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Subsurface drip irrigation (20 cm below bed surface) significantly increased rooting depth and shoot weight compared to the SD one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface drip irrigation increased shoot weight compared with surface drip.

Treatment
Subsurface drip irrigation (20 cm below bed surface)e0
Outcome
shoot weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
the SD onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Subsurface drip irrigation (20 cm below bed surface) significantly increased rooting depth and shoot weight compared to the SD one.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1255 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight and size correlated positively with root length and shoot weight.

Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
fruit weight or fruit sizee0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit weight or fruit size were significantly and positively correlated with root length and shoot weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight and size correlated negatively with irrigation water salinity.

Treatment
irrigation water salinitye0
Outcome
fruit weight or fruit sizee0
Direction
negativelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit weight or fruit size were significantly and positively correlated with root length and shoot weight and negatively with irrigation water salinity.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1483 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑

salinity · quality: phytochemicals · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

33 papers: 25 positive, 8 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

29 papers more in this group

See all 33 papers →

salinity · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

salinity · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 18 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

irrigation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

175 papers: 106 positive, 69 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 67 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

171 papers more in this group

See all 175 papers →

salinity · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

300 papers: 39 positive, 261 negative or no effect

260 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

296 papers more in this group

See all 300 papers →

irrigation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

344 papers: 239 positive, 105 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 239 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

340 papers more in this group

See all 344 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.