Paper · 2005 · Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering /Journal of Soil Sciences and Agricultural Engineering

SURFACE AND SUBSURFACE DRIP IRRIGATION METHODS AND W.~TER QUALITY EFFECT ON ROOT AND SHOOT GROWTH AND FRUIT QUALITY OF TOMATO

M. G, A. Rehan

13
claims
26
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Two field experiments were conducted during two successive early summer seasons of 2003 and 2004 on a sandy soil of El-Gsbeel farms, South Sinai. Egypt. to evaluate the effect of using the regional high salinity groundwater from representative wells (WQ 1 = 0.88 dS/m as cntrol, WQ2= 1.90. WQ3= 3.98. WQ4= 6.20. WQS; 10.00 dS/m) in surface drip (SO) and subsurface drip (SSD) irrigation of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill .. cv. GS) . Tomato rooting depth, shoot weight, fruit weight. fruit height, and fruit diameter significantly decreased with increasing salinity of the irrigation water relative to the control (WQ1). The reductions were about 16.3, 19.4, 25.8, and 58.1 % tor root length, respectively; while the corresponding reductions were 4.4,8.7,44.0. and 69.1% for shoot weight; and 16.9, 25.9. 55.9, and 64% for fruit fresh weight. Fruit height and fruit diameter exhibited a similar trend but in a Jesser magnitudes. On the other hand. fruit total soluble solids (TSS) and vitamin C concentrations significantly increased with increasing salinity and were attributed to the reduction in fruit dry weights. Subsurface drip irrigation (20 cm below bed surface) significantly increased rooting depth and shoot weight compared to the SD one. Simple correlation coefficients among the studied parameters revealed that fruit weight or fruit size were significantly and positively correlated with root length and shoot weight and negatively with irrigation water salinity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 13

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing irrigation salinity reduced tomato rooting depth.

Treatment
increasing salinity of the irrigation watere0
Outcome
rooting depthe0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control (WQ1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato rooting depth, shoot weight, fruit weight. fruit height, and fruit diameter significantly decreased with increasing salinity of the irrigation water relative to the control (WQ1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity reduced tomato shoot weight.

Treatment
increasing salinity of the irrigation watere0
Outcome
shoot weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control (WQ1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato rooting depth, shoot weight, fruit weight. fruit height, and fruit diameter significantly decreased with increasing salinity of the irrigation water relative to the control (WQ1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity reduced tomato fruit weight.

Treatment
increasing salinity of the irrigation watere0
Outcome
fruit weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control (WQ1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato rooting depth, shoot weight, fruit weight. fruit height, and fruit diameter significantly decreased with increasing salinity of the irrigation water relative to the control (WQ1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing salinity reduced tomato fruit height and diameter.

Treatment
increasing salinity of the irrigation watere0
Outcome
fruit height, and fruit diametere0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
control (WQ1)e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Tomato rooting depth, shoot weight, fruit weight. fruit height, and fruit diameter significantly decreased with increasing salinity of the irrigation water relative to the control (WQ1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 440–625 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length fell about 16.3% at WQ2 relative to control.

Treatment
WQ2e1
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
16.3e0
Comparator
WQ 1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reductions were about 16.3, 19.4, 25.8, and 58.1 % tor root length, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
e1

“WQ 1 = 0.88 dS/m as cntrol, WQ2= 1.90”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–288 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length fell about 19.4% at WQ3.

Treatment
WQ3e1
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
19.4e0
Comparator
WQ 1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reductions were about 16.3, 19.4, 25.8, and 58.1 % tor root length, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
e1

“WQ 1 = 0.88 dS/m as cntrol, WQ2= 1.90. WQ3= 3.98”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–299 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length fell about 25.8% at WQ4.

Treatment
WQ4e1
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
25.8e0
Comparator
WQ 1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reductions were about 16.3, 19.4, 25.8, and 58.1 % tor root length, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
e1

“WQ 1 = 0.88 dS/m as cntrol, WQ2= 1.90. WQ3= 3.98. WQ4= 6.20”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–310 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Root length fell about 58.1% at the highest water salinity.

Treatment
WQSe1
Outcome
root lengthe0
Direction
reductionse0
Value
58.1 %e0
Comparator
WQ 1e1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The reductions were about 16.3, 19.4, 25.8, and 58.1 % tor root length, respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 627–711 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
e1

“WQ 1 = 0.88 dS/m as cntrol, WQ2= 1.90. WQ3= 3.98. WQ4= 6.20. WQS; 10.00 dS/m”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 251–327 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit total soluble solids and vitamin C increased with salinity.

Treatment
increasing salinitye0
Outcome
fruit total soluble solids (TSS) and vitamin C concentrationse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit total soluble solids (TSS) and vitamin C concentrations significantly increased with increasing salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1064 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The increased fruit solutes were attributed to lower fruit dry weight.

Outcome
fruit total soluble solids (TSS) and vitamin C concentrationse0
Qualifier
reduction in fruit dry weightse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit total soluble solids (TSS) and vitamin C concentrations significantly increased with increasing salinity and were attributed to the reduction in fruit dry weights”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 954–1122 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Subsurface drip irrigation increased rooting depth and shoot weight versus surface drip.

Treatment
Subsurface drip irrigation (20 cm below bed surface)e0
Outcome
rooting depth and shoot weighte0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
SD onee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Subsurface drip irrigation (20 cm below bed surface) significantly increased rooting depth and shoot weight compared to the SD one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1124–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight or size correlated positively with root length and shoot weight.

Organ / stage
roote0
Outcome
fruit weight or fruit sizee0
Direction
positively correlatede0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit weight or fruit size were significantly and positively correlated with root length and shoot weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1436 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Fruit weight or size correlated negatively with irrigation water salinity.

Treatment
irrigation water salinitye0
Outcome
fruit weight or fruit sizee0
Direction
negativelye0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“fruit weight or fruit size were significantly and positively correlated with root length and shoot weight and negatively with irrigation water salinity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1331–1482 · show in text ↑
t0

“TOMATO”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 119–125 · show in text ↑

salinity · quality: sugar starch · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

51 papers: 44 positive, 7 negative or no effect

43 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

salinity · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

160 papers: 18 positive, 142 negative or no effect

141 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

156 papers more in this group

See all 160 papers →

irrigation · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

175 papers: 106 positive, 69 negative or no effect

105 papers in the same direction as this paper · 67 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

171 papers more in this group

See all 175 papers →

salinity · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

300 papers: 39 positive, 261 negative or no effect

260 papers in the same direction as this paper · 39 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

296 papers more in this group

See all 300 papers →

irrigation · yield · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

344 papers: 239 positive, 105 negative or no effect

104 papers in the same direction as this paper · 239 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

340 papers more in this group

See all 344 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.