Paper · 2022 · Journal of Crop production and processing

Effect of Plant Growth Regulators on Soluble Carbohydrates, Photosynthetic Pigments and Chlorophyll Fluorescence of Sirvan and Homa Wheat Cultivars in Rainfed and Irrigation Conditions

sadeghi, F.; Sohrabi, Y.; Sio-Se Mardeh, A.

14
claims
24
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc

Abstract

Adverse environmental conditions cause stress in plants, and some plant growth regulators (PGR’s) improve plant tolerance to these undesirable conditions. In order to study the effect of gibberellin, cytokinin and cycocle on some physiological traits of two wheat cultivars under different irrigation regimes, a study was conducted as a split-split plot experiment based on a randomized complete block design with three replications at the Agricultural Research Station of Kurdistan University, Sanandaj, Iran in 2016. Irrigation at four levels: rainfed, irrigation at booting stage, irrigation at booting + flowering and irrigation at booting + flowering + grain filling stages as the main plots, two wheat cultivars (Sirvan and Homa) as sub-plots and levels of plant growth regulators foliar application including control (no-PGR), gibberellin (100 µm), cytokinin (100 µm) and cycocel (3 g l-1) at the wheat stem elongation and grain filling stages as the sub-sub plots were examined. The results showed that soluble carbohydrates concentration was higher in rainfed conditions, compared to the other levels of irrigation. Relative water content, rate of water loss and maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) increased due to irrigation, relative to the rainfed condition. A higher chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll concentration was observed with cytokinin spray in the presence of the three irrigation treatments. The results also indicate that, at the stem elongation and grain filling stages, foliar application of gibberellin reduced the rate of leaf water loss. Application of cytokinin and cycocel increased the concent of carotenoids, application of gibberellin and cycocel increased the Fv/Fm and the use of all three PGR’s increased soluble carbohydrates concentration compared to the no-PGR condition. The highest grain yield was obtained with cytokinin and cycocel spray at the wheat stem elongation and with the application of cycocel at grain filling stages under the condition of irrigation at booting + flowering + grain filling stages. Homa cultivar produced a higher grain yield compared to Sirvan. It may be concluded that the application of cytokinin and cycocel is beneficial to some physiological attributes and hence increasing the grain yield of wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soluble carbohydrate concentration in wheat was higher under rainfed conditions than under the other irrigation levels.

Treatment
rainfed conditionse0
Outcome
soluble carbohydrates concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
the other levels of irrigatione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“soluble carbohydrates concentration was higher in rainfed conditions, compared to the other levels of irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1011–1123 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Relative water content, rate of water loss and Fv/Fm increased with irrigation relative to the rainfed condition.

Treatment
irrigatione0
Outcome
Relative water content, rate of water loss and maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (Fv/Fm)e0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
rainfed conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Relative water content, rate of water loss and maximum quantum yield of photosystem II (Fv/Fm) increased due to irrigation, relative to the rainfed condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1282 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cytokinin spray gave higher chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll concentration under the three irrigation treatments.

Treatment
cytokinin spraye0
Outcome
chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll concentratione0
Direction
highere0
Qualifier
in the presence of the three irrigation treatmentse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A higher chlorophyll a and total chlorophyll concentration was observed with cytokinin spray in the presence of the three irrigation treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1427 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Foliar gibberellin reduced the rate of leaf water loss at the stem elongation and grain filling stages.

Treatment
foliar application of gibberelline0
Outcome
rate of leaf water losse0
Direction
reducede0
Qualifier
at the stem elongation and grain filling stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at the stem elongation and grain filling stages, foliar application of gibberellin reduced the rate of leaf water loss”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1461–1579 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cytokinin application increased carotenoid concentration.

Treatment
cytokinine0
Outcome
carotenoidse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of cytokinin and cycocel increased the concent of carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1654 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycocel application increased carotenoid concentration.

Treatment
cycocele0
Outcome
carotenoidse0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Application of cytokinin and cycocel increased the concent of carotenoids”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1581–1654 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Gibberellin application increased Fv/Fm.

Treatment
gibberelline0
Outcome
Fv/Fme0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of gibberellin and cycocel increased the Fv/Fm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1714 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycocel application increased Fv/Fm.

Treatment
cycocele0
Outcome
Fv/Fme0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of gibberellin and cycocel increased the Fv/Fm”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1656–1714 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Use of all three plant growth regulators increased soluble carbohydrate concentration compared with no PGR.

Treatment
all three PGR’se0
Outcome
soluble carbohydrates concentratione0
Direction
increasede0
Comparator
no-PGR conditione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of all three PGR’s increased soluble carbohydrates concentration compared to the no-PGR condition”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1719–1824 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–137 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cytokinin spray at stem elongation gave the highest wheat grain yield under irrigation at booting + flowering + grain filling.

Treatment
cytokinine0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
under the condition of irrigation at booting + flowering + grain filling stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield was obtained with cytokinin and cycocel spray at the wheat stem elongation and with the application of cycocel at grain filling stages under the condition of irrigation at booting + flowering + grain filling stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1826–2064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycocel spray at stem elongation gave the highest wheat grain yield under irrigation at booting + flowering + grain filling.

Treatment
cycocel spray at the wheat stem elongatione0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
under the condition of irrigation at booting + flowering + grain filling stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield was obtained with cytokinin and cycocel spray at the wheat stem elongation and with the application of cycocel at grain filling stages under the condition of irrigation at booting + flowering + grain filling stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1826–2064 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cycocel applied at grain filling gave the highest wheat grain yield under irrigation at booting + flowering + grain filling.

Treatment
application of cycocel at grain filling stagese0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Qualifier
under the condition of irrigation at booting + flowering + grain filling stagese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain yield was obtained with cytokinin and cycocel spray at the wheat stem elongation and with the application of cycocel at grain filling stages under the condition of irrigation at booting + flowering + grain filling stages”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1826–2064 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cultivar Homa produced a higher grain yield than Sirvan.

Material
Homae0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
highere0
Comparator
Sirvane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Homa cultivar produced a higher grain yield compared to Sirvan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2066–2128 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 132–137 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude that cytokinin and cycocel application is beneficial to some physiological attributes and thereby increases wheat grain yield.

Outcome
grain yielde0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the application of cytokinin and cycocel is beneficial to some physiological attributes and hence increasing the grain yield of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2155–2288 · show in text ↑

chlormequat chloride · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

chlormequat chloride · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

71 papers: 53 positive, 18 negative or no effect

52 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

67 papers more in this group

See all 71 papers →

chlormequat chloride · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

class · quality: sugar starch · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

5 papers: 4 positive, 1 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

1 paper more in this group

See all 5 papers →

class · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 15 positive, 2 negative or no effect

14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

irrigation · physiology: photosynthesis · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

50 papers: 32 positive, 18 negative or no effect

31 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

46 papers more in this group

See all 50 papers →

application · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

51 papers: 49 positive, 2 negative or no effect

48 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

application · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 98 positive, 8 negative or no effect

97 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

8 of 12 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.