Paper · 2009 · Assiut Journal of Agricultural Sciences/Assuit Journal of Agricultural Sciences

Effect of Flower Thinning and Spraying with Gibberellic Acid and Ethephon on Yield and Fruit Quality of Manfalouty Pomegranate Cultivar

talaat El-Mahdy; ayman kamal; Nagwa I.A. Mohamed

15
claims
34
verbatim quotes
6
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

This investigation was executed during two successive seasons of 2006 and 2007 at the Experimental Orchard of Fruit Section, Faculty of Agriculture, Assiut University on Manfalouty pomegranate cultivar. Fifty trees of Manfalouty pomegranate cultivar were selected and divided into ten treatments; each treatment represented five trees (Replicates). The study aimed to investigate the effect of flower thinning and ethrel with or without GA3 spraying on yield and fruit quality of this cultivar. The treatments consisted of: manual thinning of all the flowers appeared during the last week of May till the end of flowering period, spraying with gibberellic acid (GA3) at 50, 100 and 150 ppm. , flower thinning + spraying with GA3 at 100 ppm., spraying with Ethrel at 1000 ppm. , spraying with Ethrel at 1000 ppm + GA3 at 50, 100 and 150 ppm and the control (water spraying). The study indicated that flower thinning recorded the highest number of grade I fruits. Flower thinning and the flower thinning + spraying caused a significant decrease in the fruit numbers of grade III while the remained treatments showed insignificant differences. Concerning the effect of different treatments on the grade I yield weight (kg), most of treatments significantly surpassed the control. Flower thinning + 100 ppm GA3 recorded the highest grade I yield followed by flower thinning and then, spraying with 50 ppm GA3. There was no significant difference among the treatments regarding the yield weight of grade II. Flower thinning and flower thinning + 100 ppm GA3 significantly decreased grade III yield weight compared to the control. Most of the treatments significantly decreased the percentage of fruit splitting especially the treatments consisted of GA3. Spraying with ethrel or GA3 and their combinations greatly decreased this phenomenon. There was insignificant effect of the treatments on most of the studied physical fruit properties on the first sampling date while the effect was significant on the second one. The results also indicated that ethrel alone or combined with GA3 enhanced ripening.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower thinning produced the highest number of grade I fruits.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Material
Manfaloutyt0
Treatment
flower thinninge0
Outcome
number of grade I fruitse0
Direction
higheste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“flower thinning recorded the highest number of grade I fruits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–960 · show in text ↑
t0

“Manfalouty Pomegranate Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower thinning significantly decreased grade III fruit number.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Flower thinninge0
Outcome
fruit numbers of grade IIIe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower thinning and the flower thinning + spraying caused a significant decrease in the fruit numbers of grade III”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“Manfalouty Pomegranate Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower thinning plus spraying significantly decreased grade III fruit number.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
flower thinning + sprayinge0
Outcome
fruit numbers of grade IIIe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower thinning and the flower thinning + spraying caused a significant decrease in the fruit numbers of grade III”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1076 · show in text ↑
t0

“Manfalouty Pomegranate Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most treatments significantly exceeded control grade I yield weight.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
most of treatmentse0
Outcome
grade I yield weighte1
Direction
surpassede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“most of treatments significantly surpassed the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1221–1275 · show in text ↑
e1

“grade I yield weight (kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1194–1219 · show in text ↑
t0

“Manfalouty Pomegranate Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower thinning plus 100 ppm GA3 gave the highest grade I yield.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Flower thinning + 100 ppm GA3e0
Outcome
grade I yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
flower thinninge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower thinning + 100 ppm GA3 recorded the highest grade I yield followed by flower thinning and then, spraying with 50 ppm GA3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1277–1404 · show in text ↑
t0

“Manfalouty Pomegranate Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Grade II yield weight did not differ significantly among treatments.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
yield weight of grade IIe0
Direction
no significant differencee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was no significant difference among the treatments regarding the yield weight of grade II”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1406–1501 · show in text ↑
t0

“Manfalouty Pomegranate Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower thinning significantly decreased grade III yield weight relative to control.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Flower thinninge0
Outcome
grade III yield weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower thinning and flower thinning + 100 ppm GA3 significantly decreased grade III yield weight compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1623 · show in text ↑
t0

“Manfalouty Pomegranate Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Flower thinning plus 100 ppm GA3 significantly decreased grade III yield weight relative to control.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
flower thinning + 100 ppm GA3e0
Outcome
grade III yield weighte0
Direction
decreasede0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Flower thinning and flower thinning + 100 ppm GA3 significantly decreased grade III yield weight compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1503–1623 · show in text ↑
t0

“Manfalouty Pomegranate Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Most treatments significantly reduced fruit splitting, particularly those with GA3.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
Most of the treatmentse0
Outcome
percentage of fruit splittinge0
Direction
decreasede0
Qualifier
especially the treatments consisted of GA3e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Most of the treatments significantly decreased the percentage of fruit splitting especially the treatments consisted of GA3”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1625–1748 · show in text ↑
t0

“Manfalouty Pomegranate Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel spray greatly reduced fruit splitting.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
ethrele0
Outcome
percentage of fruit splittinge1
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying with ethrel or GA3 and their combinations greatly decreased this phenomenon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–1834 · show in text ↑
e1

“percentage of fruit splitting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Manfalouty Pomegranate Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

GA3 spray greatly reduced fruit splitting.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
GA3e0
Outcome
percentage of fruit splittinge1
Direction
decreasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Spraying with ethrel or GA3 and their combinations greatly decreased this phenomenon”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1750–1834 · show in text ↑
e1

“percentage of fruit splitting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1676–1705 · show in text ↑
t0

“Manfalouty Pomegranate Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments generally had insignificant effects on physical fruit traits at first sampling.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
treatmentse0
Outcome
physical fruit propertiese0
Qualifier
first sampling datee0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“There was insignificant effect of the treatments on most of the studied physical fruit properties on the first sampling date”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1836–1960 · show in text ↑
t0

“Manfalouty Pomegranate Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Treatments significantly affected physical fruit traits at second sampling.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Outcome
physical fruit propertiese1
Qualifier
second onee0

Not reportedTreatmentComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the effect was significant on the second one”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1967–2011 · show in text ↑
e1

“physical fruit properties”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1908–1933 · show in text ↑
t0

“Manfalouty Pomegranate Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel alone enhanced fruit ripening.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
ethrel alonee0
Outcome
ripeninge0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethrel alone or combined with GA3 enhanced ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2045–2096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Manfalouty Pomegranate Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–135 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ethrel combined with GA3 enhanced fruit ripening.

Taxon
PomegranatePunica granatumt0
Treatment
combined with GA3e0
Outcome
ripeninge0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Punica granatum
Punica granatum · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ethrel alone or combined with GA3 enhanced ripening”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2045–2096 · show in text ↑
t0

“Manfalouty Pomegranate Cultivar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–135 · show in text ↑

Gibberellic acid · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 20 positive, 1 negative or no effect

19 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

Gibberellic acid · quality: postharvest · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

pruning · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

application · yield · Punica granatum (pomegranate)Positive and negative results

48 papers: 47 positive, 1 negative or no effect

46 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

44 papers more in this group

See all 48 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.