Paper · 2022 · Research on Crops

Influence of modified fertilizers on crop growth, productivity and soil biological values under rice (Oryza sativa) - wheat (Triticum aestivum) cropping system of Punjab, India

ARSHDEEP SINGH; CHANDRA MOHAN MEHTA; ANITA JASWAL; et al.

6
claims
14
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

In the last 60 years, chemical fertilizer has played a significant role in world food production. It provides around half of the total amount of N that crops need. Nitrates (NO3) leaching, ammonia (NH3) volatilization and nitrous oxide (N2O) emissions contribute to low crop production efficiency (10 to 50 percent) principally due to the loss of N through these processes. Furthermore, nitrogen fertilizer production costs are extremely high. Technology like nitrogen inhibitors and slow-releasing nitrogen fertilizers are used to boost nutrient uptake, fertilizer use efficiency, and crop yields as a result of these situations. Typical haplustept soils were studied to see how changing fertilizers affected growth, yield, and soil genetic indicators. Fertilizer doses and sources affect soil biological characteristics, which in turn affects enzymatic activity. In the right circumstances, enzymes alter the nitrogen supply in the soil and the plant's expansion and limestone structure. The Lovely Professional University School of Agriculture, Phagwara, Punjab, conducted two years of fertilizer studies in a rice-wheat cropping system on typical Haplustept soils from 2018 to 2020. Neem coated urea + PK + S + Zn–EDTA performed significantly better than the other treatments for almost all crop growth and agronomic yield attributing characteristics (plant height, number of tillers, effective tillers, panicle/spikelet length and grain per spik, test weight, grain and straw yields). At various stages of rice-wheat growth, enzyme activity in the soil (dehydrogenase and aryl sulfatase) was also measured in the current study. Enzyme activity peaked at the heading stage in surface soil in all treatments, and then steadily declined thereafter. For both stages of crop growth in surface soil, the highest dehydrogenase and aryl sulfatase activity was found in urea + PK + S + Zn –EDTA covered with Neem. Anhydrous ammonia was shown to have the lowest enzymatic activity.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem coated urea + PK + S + Zn–EDTA significantly outperformed the other treatments for plant height, number of tillers and effective tillers in rice-wheat.

Treatment
Neem coated urea + PK + S + Zn–EDTAe1
Outcome
plant height, number of tillers, effective tillerse1
Direction
significantly bettere1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) - wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Neem coated urea + PK + S + Zn–EDTA performed significantly better than the other treatments for almost all crop growth and agronomic yield attributing characteristics (plant height, number of tillers, effective tillers, panicle/spikelet length and grain per spik, test weight, grain and straw yields)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem coated urea + PK + S + Zn–EDTA significantly outperformed the other treatments for panicle or spikelet length, grain per spike and test weight in rice-wheat.

Treatment
Neem coated urea + PK + S + Zn–EDTAe1
Outcome
panicle/spikelet length and grain per spik, test weighte1
Direction
significantly bettere1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) - wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Neem coated urea + PK + S + Zn–EDTA performed significantly better than the other treatments for almost all crop growth and agronomic yield attributing characteristics (plant height, number of tillers, effective tillers, panicle/spikelet length and grain per spik, test weight, grain and straw yields)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1488 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Neem coated urea + PK + S + Zn–EDTA significantly outperformed the other treatments for grain and straw yields in rice-wheat.

Treatment
Neem coated urea + PK + S + Zn–EDTAe1
Outcome
grain and straw yieldse1
Direction
significantly bettere1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) - wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Neem coated urea + PK + S + Zn–EDTA performed significantly better than the other treatments for almost all crop growth and agronomic yield attributing characteristics (plant height, number of tillers, effective tillers, panicle/spikelet length and grain per spik, test weight, grain and straw yields)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1488 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Surface soil enzyme activity in rice-wheat peaked at the heading stage and then declined.

Organ / stage
heading stagee2
Outcome
Enzyme activitye2
Qualifier
surface soile2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) - wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–143 · show in text ↑
e2

“Enzyme activity peaked at the heading stage in surface soil in all treatments, and then steadily declined thereafter”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1633–1749 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea + PK + S + Zn –EDTA covered with Neem gave the highest dehydrogenase and aryl sulfatase activity in surface soil.

Organ / stage
surface soile3
Treatment
urea + PK + S + Zn –EDTA covered with Neeme3
Outcome
dehydrogenase and aryl sulfatase activitye3
Direction
higheste3
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) - wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Neem coated urea + PK + S + Zn–EDTA performed significantly better than the other treatments for almost all crop growth and agronomic yield attributing characteristics (plant height, number of tillers, effective tillers, panicle/spikelet length and grain per spik, test weight, grain and straw yields)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1488 · show in text ↑
e3

“For both stages of crop growth in surface soil, the highest dehydrogenase and aryl sulfatase activity was found in urea + PK + S + Zn –EDTA covered with Neem”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1751–1908 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Anhydrous ammonia gave the lowest enzymatic activity in the soil compared with the other treatments.

Treatment
Anhydrous ammoniae4
Outcome
enzymatic activitye4
Direction
loweste4
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“rice (Oryza sativa) - wheat (Triticum aestivum)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 96–143 · show in text ↑
e1

“Neem coated urea + PK + S + Zn–EDTA performed significantly better than the other treatments for almost all crop growth and agronomic yield attributing characteristics (plant height, number of tillers, effective tillers, panicle/spikelet length and grain per spik, test weight, grain and straw yields)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1187–1488 · show in text ↑
e4

“Anhydrous ammonia was shown to have the lowest enzymatic activity”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1910–1975 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

419 papers: 389 positive, 30 negative or no effect

388 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

415 papers more in this group

See all 419 papers →

ethylenediaminetetraacetic acid · physiology: enzyme activity · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

zinc atom · physiology: enzyme activity · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 4 positive, 2 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

zinc atom · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

22 papers: 21 positive, 1 negative or no effect

20 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

18 papers more in this group

See all 22 papers →

nitrogen · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

102 papers: 81 positive, 21 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 19 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

botanical · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Results differ

208 papers: 193 positive, 15 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

204 papers more in this group

See all 208 papers →

botanical · quality: grain · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 2 positive, 2 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · physiology: enzyme activity · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 3 positive, 3 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

8 of 10 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.