Paper · 2023 · Plants

Probiotics, Proline and Calcium Induced Protective Responses of Triticum aestivum under Drought Stress

Rima Mockevičiūtė; Sigita Jurkonienė; Vaidevutis Šveikauskas; et al.

8
claims
17
verbatim quotes
23
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

In order to increase plants tolerance to drought, the idea of treating them with stress-protecting compounds exogenously is being considered. In this study, we aimed to evaluate and compare the impact of exogenous calcium, proline, and plant probiotics on the response of winter wheat to drought stress. The research was carried out under controlled conditions, simulating a prolonged drought from 6 to 18 days. Seedlings were treated with ProbioHumus 2 µL g−1 for seed priming, 1 mL 100 mL−1 for seedling spraying, and proline 1 mM according to the scheme. 70 g m−2 CaCO3 was added to the soil. All tested compounds improved the prolonged drought tolerance of winter wheat. ProbioHumus, ProbioHumus + Ca had the greatest effect on maintaining the relative leaf water content (RWC) and in maintaining growth parameters close to those of irrigated plants. They delayed and reduced the stimulation of ethylene emission in drought-stressed leaves. Seedlings treated with ProbioHumus and ProbioHumus + Ca had a significantly lower degree of membrane damage induced by ROS. Molecular studies of drought-responsive genes revealed substantially lower expression of Ca and Probiotics + Ca treated plants vs. drought control. The results of this study showed that the use of probiotics in combination with Ca can activate defense reactions that can compensate for the adverse effects of drought stress.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 8

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

All tested compounds improved prolonged drought tolerance in winter wheat.

Taxon
winter wheatTriticum aestivume0
Treatment
exogenous calcium, proline, and plant probioticse1
Outcome
prolonged drought tolerancee0
Direction
improvede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“All tested compounds improved the prolonged drought tolerance of winter wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 596–674 · show in text ↑
e1

“exogenous calcium, proline, and plant probiotics”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 204–252 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ProbioHumus and ProbioHumus + Ca best maintained relative leaf water content during drought.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ProbioHumus, ProbioHumus + Cae0
Outcome
relative leaf water content (RWC)e0
Direction
greateste0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ProbioHumus, ProbioHumus + Ca had the greatest effect on maintaining the relative leaf water content (RWC)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–781 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ProbioHumus and ProbioHumus + Ca kept growth parameters close to irrigated plants.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ProbioHumus, ProbioHumus + Cae0
Outcome
growth parameterse0
Direction
maintaininge0
Comparator
irrigated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“ProbioHumus, ProbioHumus + Ca had the greatest effect on maintaining the relative leaf water content (RWC) and in maintaining growth parameters close to those of irrigated plants.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–854 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

ProbioHumus and ProbioHumus + Ca delayed and reduced ethylene emission stimulation in drought-stressed leaves.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
leavese0
Treatment
ProbioHumus, ProbioHumus + Cae1
Outcome
ethylene emissione0
Direction
reducede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“They delayed and reduced the stimulation of ethylene emission in drought-stressed leaves.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–944 · show in text ↑
e1

“ProbioHumus, ProbioHumus + Ca”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 675–704 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

ProbioHumus and ProbioHumus + Ca significantly lowered ROS-induced membrane damage in seedlings.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Organ / stage
Seedlingse0
Treatment
ProbioHumus and ProbioHumus + Cae0
Outcome
membrane damage induced by ROSe0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Seedlings treated with ProbioHumus and ProbioHumus + Ca had a significantly lower degree of membrane damage induced by ROS.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 945–1068 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Calcium treatment reduced drought-responsive gene expression relative to drought control.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Cae0
Gene
drought-responsive genese0
Outcome
expressione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
drought controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Molecular studies of drought-responsive genes revealed substantially lower expression of Ca and Probiotics + Ca treated plants vs. drought control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Probiotics plus calcium reduced drought-responsive gene expression relative to drought control.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Probiotics + Cae0
Gene
drought-responsive genese0
Outcome
expressione0
Direction
lowere0
Comparator
drought controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Molecular studies of drought-responsive genes revealed substantially lower expression of Ca and Probiotics + Ca treated plants vs. drought control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1069–1216 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors conclude probiotics with calcium can activate defenses that compensate for drought effects.

Taxon
Triticum aestivumTriticum aestivumt0
Treatment
probiotics in combination with Cae0
Outcome
defense reactionse0
Qualifier
compensate for the adverse effects of drought stresse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the use of probiotics in combination with Ca can activate defense reactions that can compensate for the adverse effects of drought stress.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1255–1393 · show in text ↑
t0

“Triticum aestivum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 64–81 · show in text ↑

calcium atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

43 papers: 35 positive, 8 negative or no effect

34 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

proline · tolerance: abiotic · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

4 papers: 3 positive, 1 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

calcium atom · tolerance: abiotic · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 2 positive, 4 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

calcium atom · physiology: oxidative · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 8 positive, 3 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

calcium atom · physiology: hormones · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

calcium atom · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.