Paper · 2023 · International Journal of Environment and Climate Change

Effect of Tillage and Weed Management Practices on Growth and Yield Attributes of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)

Gaurav Shukla; R.S. Singh; Rishabh Singh Chandel; et al.

4
claims
8
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the Rabi season of 2017-18 at Acharya Narendra Deva University of Agriculture & Technology, Kumarganj, Ayodhya 224229 (U.P.) to study the effect of various tillage and weed management practices on growth parameters, yield attributes and yield of wheat crop. The combination of treatments were five tillage system in main plot viz., TPR-CT, W-CT (T1), TPR-CT+W-ZT+S-ZT (T2), DSR-CT+W-CT+S-ZT (T3), DSR-ZT+W-ZTR+S-ZT (T4) and DSR-ZTR+W-ZTR+S-ZT (T5) and three-level of weed management practices in sub plot viz., Clodinafop + metsulfuron @ 60 + 4g/ha at 30 DAS (W1), Clodinafop + metsulfuron @ 60 + 4g/ha at 30 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 45 DAS (W2) and 1 hand weeding at 45 DAS (W3) in wheat were tested with 3 replication in split-plot design. The soil was silt loam in texture and medium in fertility status. Among various tillage and weed management practices DSR-ZT+R, W-ZT+R, S-ZT (T5) and Clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4g/ha at 30 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 45 DAS (W2) resulted in lowest in total weed density and total weed dry weight (g/m2) and highest values of growth parameters, yield attributes and yield in comparison to other tillage practices and weed management practices.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 4

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 tillage produced the lowest weed density and dry weight relative to other tillage practices.

Treatment
DSR-ZT+R, W-ZT+R, S-ZT (T5)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
total weed density and total weed dry weight (g/m2)e0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
other tillage practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DSR-ZT+R, W-ZT+R, S-ZT (T5) and Clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4g/ha at 30 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 45 DAS (W2) resulted in lowest in total weed density and total weed dry weight (g/m2) and highest values of growth parameters, yield attributes and yield in comparison to other tillage practices and weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W2 weed management produced the lowest weed density and dry weight relative to other weed management practices.

Treatment
Clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4g/ha at 30 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 45 DAS (W2)e0
Interactor
weede0weed
Outcome
total weed density and total weed dry weight (g/m2)e0
Direction
loweste0
Comparator
weed management practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DSR-ZT+R, W-ZT+R, S-ZT (T5) and Clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4g/ha at 30 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 45 DAS (W2) resulted in lowest in total weed density and total weed dry weight (g/m2) and highest values of growth parameters, yield attributes and yield in comparison to other tillage practices and weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T5 tillage gave the highest growth parameters, yield attributes and yield relative to other tillage practices.

Treatment
DSR-ZT+R, W-ZT+R, S-ZT (T5)e0
Outcome
growth parameters, yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
other tillage practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DSR-ZT+R, W-ZT+R, S-ZT (T5) and Clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4g/ha at 30 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 45 DAS (W2) resulted in lowest in total weed density and total weed dry weight (g/m2) and highest values of growth parameters, yield attributes and yield in comparison to other tillage practices and weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

W2 weed management gave the highest growth parameters, yield attributes and yield relative to other weed management practices.

Treatment
Clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4g/ha at 30 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 45 DAS (W2)e0
Outcome
growth parameters, yield attributes and yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
weed management practicese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“DSR-ZT+R, W-ZT+R, S-ZT (T5) and Clodinafop + metsulfuron 60 + 4g/ha at 30 DAS fb 1 hand weeding at 45 DAS (W2) resulted in lowest in total weed density and total weed dry weight (g/m2) and highest values of growth parameters, yield attributes and yield in comparison to other tillage practices and weed management practices”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 900–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–110 · show in text ↑

clodinafop · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

60 papers: 57 positive, 3 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

56 papers more in this group

See all 60 papers →

clodinafop · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 54 positive, 7 negative or no effect

53 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 132 positive, 2 negative or no effect

131 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

metsulfuron methyl · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

155 papers: 143 positive, 12 negative or no effect

142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

151 papers more in this group

See all 155 papers →

transplanting · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 13 positive, 8 negative or no effect

12 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

transplanting · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

176 papers: 129 positive, 47 negative or no effect

128 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

172 papers more in this group

See all 176 papers →

herbicide · weed · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

401 papers: 362 positive, 39 negative or no effect

361 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

397 papers more in this group

See all 401 papers →

herbicide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

563 papers: 466 positive, 97 negative or no effect

465 papers in the same direction as this paper · 87 in the opposite direction · 10 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

559 papers more in this group

See all 563 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.