Paper · 2023 · Journal of Soil and Water Conservation

Response of bio-fertilizers, levels of nitrogen and different row spacings on productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

Raj Kumar; Munish Kumar; Durgesh Kumar; et al.

20
claims
40
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

An experiment was conducted at Kanpur, during rabi 2014-15 and 2015-16 to find out the response of row spacing, bio-fertilizer, and nitrogen levels on yield and yield attributes of chickpeas. The treatments comprised of row spacing i.e. 40 cm and 60 cm, biofertilizer i.e. Rhizobium leguminosarum culture (seed coating @ 20 g kg-1 seed), Phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) @ 2.5 kg ha-1 in soil and Rhizobium leguminosarum + Phosphate solubilizing bacteria (PSB) and nitrogen level i.e. 10, 20 and N30 kg ha-1 in Split plot design with 3 replications. The results showed that 60 cm row spacing produced significantly higher yield attributes in both years on pooled basis-number of pods plant-1 (57.57), a number of seeds pod-1 (1.72), 1000-seed weight (147.64 g), nodules plant-1 at 50 DAS (28.08), fresh & dry weight nodules plant-1 at 50 DAS (76.58 and 44.37 mg) and protein content (21.06%). Among the bio-fertilizers, the performance of dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum culture + PSB was recorded as significantly superior with regard to the number of pods plant-1 (57.61), number of seeds pod-1 (1.89), 1000- seed weight (148.75) nodules plant-1 at 50 DAS (29.70), fresh & dry weight nodules plant-1 at 50 DAS (81.34 and 48.12 mg) and protein content (21.26%). Nitrogen level @ 30 kg ha-1 recorded significantly higher No. of pod plant-1 (147.64 g), number of seeds pod-1 (1.97), 1000- seed weight (149.47g), nodules plant-1 at 50 DAS (30.54), fresh & dry weight nodules/plant at 50 DAS (81.34 and 48.12 mg) and protein content (21.15%). The 40 cm row spacing produced significantly higher yield in both years on the pool basis seed yield recorded (14.22 q ha-1), stover yield (20.20 q ha-1), harvest index (41.16%), gross return Rs. 75593 ha-1, net return Rs. 56972 ha-1 and B.C. ratio 1:3.07. Among the biofertilizers, the performance of dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum + PSB was recorded as significantly superior with seed yield (14.33 q ha-1), stover yield (19.15 q ha-1), harvest index (42.48%), gross return Rs. 76047 ha-1, net return Rs. 58225 ha-1 and B:C ratio 1:3.27. However, nitrogen level @ 30 kg ha-1 recorded significantly higher on seed yield (14.83 q ha-1), stover yield (19.97 q ha-1), harvest index (42.83%), gross return Rs. 78728 ha-1, net return Rs. 60994 ha-1 and B:C ratio1:3.44.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 20

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 cm row spacing produced significantly higher number of pods per plant in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
60 cm row spacinge1
Outcome
number of pods plant-1e1
Direction
significantly highere1
Value
57.57e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“60 cm row spacing produced significantly higher yield attributes in both years on pooled basis-number of pods plant-1 (57.57)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–704 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 cm row spacing produced significantly higher 1000-seed weight in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
60 cm row spacinge2
Outcome
1000-seed weighte2
Direction
significantly highere2
Value
147.64 ge2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e2

“60 cm row spacing produced significantly higher yield attributes in both years on pooled basis-number of pods plant-1 (57.57), a number of seeds pod-1 (1.72), 1000-seed weight (147.64 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–765 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 cm row spacing produced significantly higher nodules per plant at 50 DAS in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
60 cm row spacinge3
Outcome
nodules plant-1 at 50 DASe3
Direction
significantly highere3
Value
28.08e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e3

“60 cm row spacing produced significantly higher yield attributes in both years on pooled basis-number of pods plant-1 (57.57), a number of seeds pod-1 (1.72), 1000-seed weight (147.64 g), nodules plant-1 at 50 DAS (28.08)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–800 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 60 cm row spacing produced significantly higher protein content in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
60 cm row spacinge4
Outcome
protein contente4
Direction
significantly highere4
Value
21.06%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e4

“60 cm row spacing produced significantly higher yield attributes in both years on pooled basis-number of pods plant-1 (57.57), a number of seeds pod-1 (1.72), 1000-seed weight (147.64 g), nodules plant-1 at 50 DAS (28.08), fresh & dry weight nodules plant-1 at 50 DAS (76.58 and 44.37 mg) and protein content (21.06%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 579–896 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum culture and PSB produced significantly superior number of pods per plant in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum culture + PSBe5
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume5symbiont
Outcome
number of pods plant-1e5
Direction
significantly superiore5
Value
57.61e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e5

“the performance of dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum culture + PSB was recorded as significantly superior with regard to the number of pods plant-1 (57.61)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1090 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum culture and PSB produced significantly superior protein content in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum culture + PSBe6
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume6symbiont
Outcome
protein contente6
Direction
significantly superiore6
Value
21.26%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e6

“the performance of dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum culture + PSB was recorded as significantly superior with regard to the number of pods plant-1 (57.61), number of seeds pod-1 (1.89), 1000- seed weight (148.75) nodules plant-1 at 50 DAS (29.70), fresh & dry weight nodules plant-1 at 50 DAS (81.34 and 48.12 mg) and protein content (21.26%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1278 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum and PSB produced significantly superior seed yield in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum + PSBe7
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume7symbiont
Outcome
seed yielde7
Direction
significantly superiore7
Value
14.33 q ha-1e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e7

“the performance of dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum + PSB was recorded as significantly superior with seed yield (14.33 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1840–1978 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum and PSB produced significantly superior B:C ratio in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum + PSBe0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Value
1:3.27e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the biofertilizers, the performance of dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum + PSB was recorded as significantly superior with seed yield (14.33 q ha-1), stover yield (19.15 q ha-1), harvest index (42.48%), gross return Rs. 76047 ha-1, net return Rs. 58225 ha-1 and B:C ratio 1:3.27”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–2108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum and PSB produced significantly superior harvest index in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum + PSBe0
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume0symbiont
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
significantly superiore0
Value
42.48%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e0

“Among the biofertilizers, the performance of dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum + PSB was recorded as significantly superior with seed yield (14.33 q ha-1), stover yield (19.15 q ha-1), harvest index (42.48%), gross return Rs. 76047 ha-1, net return Rs. 58225 ha-1 and B:C ratio 1:3.27”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1814–2108 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen level of 30 kg ha-1 produced significantly higher seed yield in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
nitrogen level @ 30 kg ha-1e1
Outcome
seed yielde1
Direction
significantly highere1
Value
14.83 q ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“nitrogen level @ 30 kg ha-1 recorded significantly higher on seed yield (14.83 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2119–2205 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen level of 30 kg ha-1 produced significantly higher harvest index in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
nitrogen level @ 30 kg ha-1e2
Outcome
harvest indexe2
Direction
significantly highere2
Value
42.83%e2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e2

“nitrogen level @ 30 kg ha-1 recorded significantly higher on seed yield (14.83 q ha-1), stover yield (19.97 q ha-1), harvest index (42.83%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2119–2258 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen level of 30 kg ha-1 produced significantly higher B:C ratio in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
nitrogen level @ 30 kg ha-1e3
Outcome
B:C ratioe3
Direction
significantly highere3
Value
1:3.44e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e3

“nitrogen level @ 30 kg ha-1 recorded significantly higher on seed yield (14.83 q ha-1), stover yield (19.97 q ha-1), harvest index (42.83%), gross return Rs. 78728 ha-1, net return Rs. 60994 ha-1 and B:C ratio1:3.44”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 2119–2334 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen level of 30 kg ha-1 produced significantly higher protein content in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Nitrogen level @ 30 kg ha-1e4
Outcome
protein contente4
Direction
significantly highere4
Value
21.15%e4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nitrogen level @ 30 kg ha-1 recorded significantly higher No. of pod plant-1 (147.64 g), number of seeds pod-1 (1.97), 1000- seed weight (149.47g), nodules plant-1 at 50 DAS (30.54), fresh & dry weight nodules/plant at 50 DAS (81.34 and 48.12 mg) and protein content (21.15%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 40 cm row spacing produced significantly higher seed yield in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
40 cm row spacinge5
Outcome
seed yielde5
Direction
significantly highere5
Value
14.22 q ha-1e5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e5

“The 40 cm row spacing produced significantly higher yield in both years on the pool basis seed yield recorded (14.22 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1681 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 40 cm row spacing produced significantly higher harvest index in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
40 cm row spacinge6
Outcome
harvest indexe6
Direction
significantly highere6
Value
41.16%e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e6

“The 40 cm row spacing produced significantly higher yield in both years on the pool basis seed yield recorded (14.22 q ha-1), stover yield (20.20 q ha-1), harvest index (41.16%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1734 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 40 cm row spacing produced significantly higher B:C ratio in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
40 cm row spacinge7
Outcome
B.C. ratioe7
Direction
significantly highere7
Value
1:3.07e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e7

“The 40 cm row spacing produced significantly higher yield in both years on the pool basis seed yield recorded (14.22 q ha-1), stover yield (20.20 q ha-1), harvest index (41.16%), gross return Rs. 75593 ha-1, net return Rs. 56972 ha-1 and B.C. ratio 1:3.07”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1812 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 40 cm row spacing produced significantly higher stover yield in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
40 cm row spacinge1
Outcome
stover yielde1
Direction
significantly highere1
Value
20.20 q ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e1

“The 40 cm row spacing produced significantly higher yield in both years on the pool basis seed yield recorded (14.22 q ha-1), stover yield (20.20 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1710 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum and PSB produced significantly superior nodules per plant at 50 DAS in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum culture + PSBe6
Interactor
Rhizobium leguminosarumRhizobium leguminosarume6symbiont
Outcome
nodules plant-1 at 50 DASe6
Direction
significantly superiore6
Value
29.70e6

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium leguminosarum
Rhizobium leguminosarum · Interactor · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryQaswarah 21 · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e6

“the performance of dual inoculation of Rhizobium leguminosarum culture + PSB was recorded as significantly superior with regard to the number of pods plant-1 (57.61), number of seeds pod-1 (1.89), 1000- seed weight (148.75) nodules plant-1 at 50 DAS (29.70), fresh & dry weight nodules plant-1 at 50 DAS (81.34 and 48.12 mg) and protein content (21.26%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 925–1278 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitrogen level of 30 kg ha-1 produced significantly higher 1000-seed weight in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
Nitrogen level @ 30 kg ha-1e4
Outcome
1000- seed weighte4
Direction
significantly highere4
Value
149.47ge4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e4

“Nitrogen level @ 30 kg ha-1 recorded significantly higher No. of pod plant-1 (147.64 g), number of seeds pod-1 (1.97), 1000- seed weight (149.47g), nodules plant-1 at 50 DAS (30.54), fresh & dry weight nodules/plant at 50 DAS (81.34 and 48.12 mg) and protein content (21.15%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1280–1555 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 40 cm row spacing produced significantly higher net return in chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
40 cm row spacinge7
Outcome
net returne7
Direction
significantly highere7
Value
Rs. 56972 ha-1e7

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“productivity of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 78–123 · show in text ↑
e7

“The 40 cm row spacing produced significantly higher yield in both years on the pool basis seed yield recorded (14.22 q ha-1), stover yield (20.20 q ha-1), harvest index (41.16%), gross return Rs. 75593 ha-1, net return Rs. 56972 ha-1 and B.C. ratio 1:3.07”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1557–1812 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium leguminosarum · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Rhizobium leguminosarum · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Rhizobium leguminosarum · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

inoculation · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

34 papers: 31 positive, 3 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

30 papers more in this group

See all 34 papers →

phosphorus · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

51 papers: 50 positive, 1 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

47 papers more in this group

See all 51 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

102 papers: 93 positive, 9 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 9 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

98 papers more in this group

See all 102 papers →

density · symbiosis · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

7 papers: 5 positive, 2 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. positive

3 papers more in this group

See all 7 papers →

nitrogen · quality: protein · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 17 positive, 1 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

8 of 14 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.