Paper · 2023 · Research Biotica

Effect of Elevated CO2 and Temperature on Phosphorus Harvest Index of Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) at Various Levels of Phosphorus Fertilization

Manoj Kumar

5
claims
5
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

The possible alteration in plant growth, productivity and phosphorus (P) demand of wheat under rising atmospheric CO2 and temperature is expected to influence the partitioning of P to different plant parts of wheat. A phytotron experiment was conducted to study the effects of elevated atmospheric CO2 (650 µmol mol-1) and elevated temperature (ambient + 3 °C) on phosphorus harvest index of wheat at various levels (control, 100% and 200% of recommended P) of P fertilization. While there was a slight increase (5.6%) in P harvest index of wheat under elevated CO2, the reverse trend (12.7% decline) was observed under elevated temperature with no consistent effect at various levels of P fertilization. Interestingly, there was a moderate decline (7.7%) in P harvest index of wheat under combined elevation of CO2 and temperature as compared to their ambient combination. The results suggest that temperature could be the dominant factor as compared to the atmospheric CO2 in deciding the overall impact of projected increase in atmospheric CO2 and temperature on P harvest index of wheat. As there is logically possible relationship between P harvest index of wheat and various physical and nutritional qualities of wheat grains such as grain Zn and Fe content and their bio-availability, grain protein content, seedling vigour, etc., the decline in wheat’s P harvest index under projected levels of CO2 and temperature in our study underscores the need of undertaking elaborate experimentations to investigate the probable effects of climate change on quality parameters associated with P harvest index of wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated CO2 slightly increased the P harvest index of wheat by 5.6%.

Treatment
elevated CO2e1
Outcome
P harvest indexe1
Direction
increasee1
Value
5.6%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“there was a slight increase (5.6%) in P harvest index of wheat under elevated CO2”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–565 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Elevated temperature reduced the P harvest index of wheat by 12.7%.

Treatment
elevated temperaturee1
Outcome
P harvest indexe1
Direction
declinee1
Value
12.7%e1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“there was a slight increase (5.6%) in P harvest index of wheat under elevated CO2, the reverse trend (12.7% decline) was observed under elevated temperature”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–640 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The effect on wheat P harvest index was not consistent across the levels of P fertilization.

Treatment
P fertilizatione1
Outcome
P harvest indexe1
Direction
no consistent effecte1

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“there was a slight increase (5.6%) in P harvest index of wheat under elevated CO2, the reverse trend (12.7% decline) was observed under elevated temperature with no consistent effect at various levels of P fertilization”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 484–703 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Combined elevated CO2 and temperature moderately reduced wheat P harvest index by 7.7% relative to their ambient combination.

Treatment
combined elevation of CO2 and temperaturee1
Outcome
P harvest indexe1
Direction
declinee1
Value
7.7%e1
Comparator
ambient combinatione1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“there was a moderate decline (7.7%) in P harvest index of wheat under combined elevation of CO2 and temperature as compared to their ambient combination”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 720–872 · show in text ↑
Mechanismauthor interpretationoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The authors suggest temperature could be the dominant factor, compared with atmospheric CO2, in determining the impact of projected CO2 and temperature increases on wheat P harvest index.

Treatment
temperaturee1
Outcome
P harvest indexe1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“temperature could be the dominant factor as compared to the atmospheric CO2 in deciding the overall impact of projected increase in atmospheric CO2 and temperature on P harvest index of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1090 · show in text ↑

altitude · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 5 positive, 7 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

co2 · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

203 papers: 174 positive, 29 negative or no effect

173 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. no effect

199 papers more in this group

See all 203 papers →

heat · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

309 papers: 54 positive, 255 negative or no effect

254 papers in the same direction as this paper · 54 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

305 papers more in this group

See all 309 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

322 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3,115 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.