Paper · 2022 · The Philippine Agricultural Scientist

Morpho-Physiological Responses of Wheat to Silicon and Bio-Fertilizer under Water-Deficit Conditions

Mehrdad Arab-Aval; Hamid Reza Ganjali

6
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

Recently, the use of silicon and bio-fertilizer has become important worldwide to improve the physicochemical characteristics of soil. Thus, they are used as an alternative approach to cope with the water-deficit stress on wheat plant. In this regard, a split-plot factorial experiment based on randomized complete block design with three replications was conducted during 2017 and 2018 at Sistan and Baluchestan Research Station, Iran. In the present study, treatments included water-deficit stress (irrigation after 60, 120, and 180 mm of evaporation from Class A pan) as the main plot, as well as the application of silicic acid (Si) foliar nutrition (0, 1, and 1.5 mM) and Nitro-Kara bio-fertilizer as sub-plots. The results represented the significant interaction effects of irrigation regimes, bio-fertilizer, and Si on 1000-grain weight and panicle number. In addition, the co-application of Nitro-Kara and Si fertilizers (1 mM) under irrigation after 120 mm evaporation led to the highest grain per panicle (44 number), which reflected a 21.36% increase compared to the control. The greatest 1000-grain weight (39.66 g) was obtained by inoculating seed with Nitro-Kara and without to apply Si fertilizer under 120 mm irrigation treatment in the first year. Further, inoculation under moderate stress (120 mm) in the second year demonstrated the highest grain yield (5,256.3 kg ha-1). Furthermore, a high chlorophyll index (57.6) was achieved when consuming 1.5 mM Si fertilizer and without Nitro Kara under 120 mm irrigation regime during the first year, which had a 20.2% enhancement compared to the control treatment. Under low irrigation conditions, the use of Nitro-Kara bio-fertilizer and Si fertilizer resulted generally in improving physiological parameters and increasing the growth and yield indices of wheat.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Observationobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Irrigation, biofertilizer and Si interacted significantly for 1000-grain weight and panicle number.

Outcome
1000-grain weight and panicle numbere0
Qualifier
interaction effects of irrigation regimes, bio-fertilizer, and Sie0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results represented the significant interaction effects of irrigation regimes, bio-fertilizer, and Si on 1000-grain weight and panicle number.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 717–863 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitro-Kara and 1 mM Si at 120 mm evaporation produced 44 grains per panicle, a 21.36% increase.

Treatment
co-application of Nitro-Kara and Si fertilizers (1 mM)e0
Outcome
grain per paniclee0
Direction
higheste0
Value
44 numbere0
Qualifier
21.36% increasee0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the co-application of Nitro-Kara and Si fertilizers (1 mM) under irrigation after 120 mm evaporation led to the highest grain per panicle (44 number), which reflected a 21.36% increase compared to the control.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 877–1086 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitro-Kara without Si at 120 mm irrigation gave the greatest first-year 1000-grain weight.

Treatment
inoculating seed with Nitro-Kara and without to apply Si fertilizere0
Outcome
1000-grain weighte0
Direction
greateste0
Value
39.66 ge0
Qualifier
120 mm irrigation treatment in the first yeare0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The greatest 1000-grain weight (39.66 g) was obtained by inoculating seed with Nitro-Kara and without to apply Si fertilizer under 120 mm irrigation treatment in the first year.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1087–1264 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitro-Kara under moderate stress gave highest second-year grain yield.

Treatment
inoculation under moderate stress (120 mm)e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
5,256.3 kg ha-1e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“inoculation under moderate stress (120 mm) in the second year demonstrated the highest grain yield (5,256.3 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1391 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

1.5 mM Si without Nitro Kara at 120 mm irrigation gave a chlorophyll index of 57.6, 20.2% above control.

Treatment
1.5 mM Si fertilizer and without Nitro Karae0
Outcome
chlorophyll indexe0
Direction
enhancemente0
Value
57.6e0
Qualifier
20.2%e0
Comparator
control treatmente0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“a high chlorophyll index (57.6) was achieved when consuming 1.5 mM Si fertilizer and without Nitro Kara under 120 mm irrigation regime during the first year, which had a 20.2% enhancement compared to the control treatment.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1627 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 34–39 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nitro-Kara and Si generally improved physiology, growth and yield under low irrigation.

Treatment
Nitro-Kara bio-fertilizer and Si fertilizere0
Outcome
physiological parameters and increasing the growth and yield indicese0
Direction
improvinge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Under low irrigation conditions, the use of Nitro-Kara bio-fertilizer and Si fertilizer resulted generally in improving physiological parameters and increasing the growth and yield indices of wheat.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1628–1826 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

90 papers: 85 positive, 5 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

silicon atom · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 24 positive, 1 negative or no effect

23 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · physiology: pigments · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

134 papers: 123 positive, 11 negative or no effect

122 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

130 papers more in this group

See all 134 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.