Abstract
Groundnut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is an important oilseed crop cultivated worldwide. The present study was conducted to evaluate the effect of biofertilizers and phosphorus on the growth and yield of groundnut. A field experiment was conducted using a randomized complete block design with four replications. The treatments included different combinations of biofertilizers (Rhizobium and Phosphorus solubilizing bacteria and VAM) and phosphorus levels (30, 45, and 60 kg P2O5 ha/1). The results indicated that the application of biofertilizers and phosphorus significantly influenced the growth and yield parameters of groundnut. The combined application of Rhizobium along with VAM and 60 kg P2O5 ha/1 significantly increased plant height, number of branches per plant, number of pods per plant, pod yield, and oil content compared to the control. These findings suggest that the integrated use of biofertilizers and phosphorus can enhance the growth and yield of groundnut, thereby improving its productivity and economic returns for farmers. The result reported the application of Rhizobium along with VAM and Phosphorus 60 kg/ha recorded maximum plant height (58.39 cm), maximum dry weight (38.46 g/plant), nodules per plant (46.56), number of pod per plant (28.87), seed index (38.81), kernel yield (2.47 t/ha), haulm yield (2.97) were recorded in (treatment – 9) that is with Rhizobium + VAM + Phosphorus 60 kg/ha.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 11
Claim · model-written summary
Application of biofertilizers and phosphorus significantly influenced the growth and yield parameters of groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnut
Arachis hypogaeae1 - Treatment
- biofertilizers and phosphoruse1
- Outcome
- growth and yield parameterse1
Not reportedComparatorDirection
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“application of biofertilizers and phosphorus significantly influenced the growth and yield parameters of groundnut”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined application of Rhizobium with VAM and 60 kg P2O5 ha/1 significantly increased number of branches per plant in groundnut compared to the control.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- combined application of Rhizobium along with VAM and 60 kg P2O5 ha/1e1
- Second interactor
- VAMe1symbiont
- Outcome
- number of branches per plante4
- Direction
- increasede2
- Comparator
- the controle3
RhizobiumOrganisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“groundnut”
e1“combined application of Rhizobium along with VAM and 60 kg P2O5 ha/1”
e2“significantly increased”
e4“number of branches per plant”
e3“compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
The combined application of Rhizobium with VAM and 60 kg P2O5 ha/1 significantly increased pod yield and oil content in groundnut compared to the control.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- combined application of Rhizobium along with VAM and 60 kg P2O5 ha/1e1
- Second interactor
- VAMe1symbiont
- Outcome
- pod yield, and oil contente4
- Direction
- increasede2
- Comparator
- the controle3
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“groundnut”
e1“combined application of Rhizobium along with VAM and 60 kg P2O5 ha/1”
e2“significantly increased”
e4“pod yield, and oil content”
e3“compared to the control”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium with VAM and phosphorus 60 kg/ha gave the maximum plant height of 58.39 cm in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Rhizobium along with VAM and Phosphorus 60 kg/hae1
- Second interactor
- VAMe1symbiont
- Outcome
- plant heighte2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 58.39 cme2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“groundnut”
e1“Rhizobium along with VAM and Phosphorus 60 kg/ha”
e2“maximum plant height (58.39 cm)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium with VAM and phosphorus 60 kg/ha gave the maximum dry weight of 38.46 g/plant in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Rhizobium along with VAM and Phosphorus 60 kg/hae1
- Second interactor
- VAMe1symbiont
- Outcome
- dry weighte2
- Direction
- maximume2
- Value
- 38.46 g/plante2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“groundnut”
e1“Rhizobium along with VAM and Phosphorus 60 kg/ha”
e2“maximum dry weight (38.46 g/plant)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium with VAM and phosphorus 60 kg/ha recorded 46.56 nodules per plant in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Rhizobium along with VAM and Phosphorus 60 kg/hae1
- Second interactor
- VAMe1symbiont
- Outcome
- nodules per plante2
- Direction
- increaseinferrede2
- Value
- 46.56e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“groundnut”
e1“Rhizobium along with VAM and Phosphorus 60 kg/ha”
e2“nodules per plant (46.56)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium with VAM and phosphorus 60 kg/ha recorded 28.87 pods per plant in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Rhizobium along with VAM and Phosphorus 60 kg/hae1
- Second interactor
- VAMe1symbiont
- Outcome
- number of pod per plante2
- Direction
- increaseinferrede2
- Value
- 28.87e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“groundnut”
e1“Rhizobium along with VAM and Phosphorus 60 kg/ha”
e2“number of pod per plant (28.87)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium with VAM and phosphorus 60 kg/ha recorded a seed index of 38.81 in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Rhizobium along with VAM and Phosphorus 60 kg/hae1
- Second interactor
- VAMe1symbiont
- Outcome
- seed indexe2
- Direction
- increaseinferrede2
- Value
- 38.81e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“groundnut”
e1“Rhizobium along with VAM and Phosphorus 60 kg/ha”
e2“seed index (38.81)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium with VAM and phosphorus 60 kg/ha recorded a kernel yield of 2.47 t/ha in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Rhizobium along with VAM and Phosphorus 60 kg/hae1
- Second interactor
- VAMe1symbiont
- Outcome
- kernel yielde2
- Direction
- increaseinferrede2
- Value
- 2.47 t/hae2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“groundnut”
e1“Rhizobium along with VAM and Phosphorus 60 kg/ha”
e2“kernel yield (2.47 t/ha)”
Claim · model-written summary
Rhizobium with VAM and phosphorus 60 kg/ha recorded a haulm yield of 2.97 in groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeat0
- Treatment
- Rhizobium along with VAM and Phosphorus 60 kg/hae1
- Second interactor
- VAMe1symbiont
- Outcome
- haulm yielde2
- Direction
- increaseinferrede2
- Value
- 2.97e2
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
t0“groundnut”
e1“Rhizobium along with VAM and Phosphorus 60 kg/ha”
e2“haulm yield (2.97)”
Claim · model-written summary
The authors suggest that integrated use of biofertilizers and phosphorus can enhance the growth and yield of groundnut.
- Taxon
- groundnutArachis hypogaeae1
- Outcome
- growth and yielde1
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“the integrated use of biofertilizers and phosphorus can enhance the growth and yield of groundnut”
The same questions in other papers
Rhizobium · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- positive
17 papers more in this group
See all 21 papers →Rhizobium · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →Rhizobium · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
55 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- no effect
- positive
54 papers more in this group
See all 58 papers →Rhizobium · quality: oil · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results agree
7 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
- positive
4 papers more in this group
See all 8 papers →phosphorus · yield · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Results differ
159 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
174 papers more in this group
See all 178 papers →phosphorus · quality: oil · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
13 papers more in this group
See all 17 papers →mycorrhiza · growth · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
17 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
15 papers more in this group
See all 19 papers →phosphorus · symbiosis · Arachis hypogaea (peanut)Positive and negative results
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
24 papers more in this group
See all 28 papers →8 of 13 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.
Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.