Paper · 2024 · Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis

Foliar Application of Silicon Influences Crop Productivity, Dry Matter Accumulation, Water Use Efficiency, Lodging Score, and Aphid Density in Wheat ( Triticum aestivum L.)

Pooja Jhorar; Roshan Choudhary; Dinesh Jinger; et al.

12
claims
23
verbatim quotes
6
citations
3
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

Silicon (Si) is a versatile nutrient that plays an instrumental role in mitigating biotic and abiotic stresses besides improving growth and yield of graminaceous crops. We hypothesized that application Si would significantly improve productivity and resilience of wheat. Hence, the objectives were a) to assess the impact of Si application on wheat growth, productivity, nutrient uptake, water use efficiency, and b) to determine the potentiality of Si in mitigating lodging and aphid density. Therefore, we conducted a field experiment with five levels of Si (0, 2, 4, 6, and 8 g Si liter−1) at three growth stages (crown root initiation, tillering, and jointing stage) using a factorial randomized block design replicated three times. The results showed that increasing Si doses positively influenced plant height, dry matter accumulation (DMA), leaf area index (LAI), yield, and nutrient uptake. The highest grain and straw yield were observed with 8 g Si liter−1, followed by 6 g Si liter−1, while the control had the lowest yields. With 8 g Si liter−1, grain yield, straw yield, and Si uptake increased by 10.5%, 13.5%, and 26.3%, respectively, compared to the control. Additionally, Si application at 8 g Si liter−1 significantly reduced the density of S. avenae (aphids) by 81.4% and lodging by 75.1% compared to the control. Overall, the study demonstrated that increasing Si doses enhanced various growth and yield parameters, with 8 g Si liter−1 and 6 g Si liter−1 showing superior results. Among the growth stages, foliar application of Si during the tillering stage exhibited better performance in terms of growth, yield, and nutrient uptake in wheat. Therefore, the study concludes that Si fertilization at a rate of 8 g Si liter−1 during the tillering stage can effectively improve growth, productivity, and nutrient uptake in wheat in the southern region of Rajasthan.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 12

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing silicon doses increased wheat height, dry matter and leaf area index.

Treatment
increasing Si dosese0
Outcome
plant height, dry matter accumulation (DMA), leaf area index (LAI)e0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing Si doses positively influenced plant height, dry matter accumulation (DMA), leaf area index (LAI), yield, and nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–897 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si application on wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing silicon doses increased wheat yield.

Treatment
increasing Si dosese0
Outcome
yielde0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing Si doses positively influenced plant height, dry matter accumulation (DMA), leaf area index (LAI), yield, and nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–897 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si application on wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increasing silicon doses increased nutrient uptake.

Treatment
increasing Si dosese0
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
positively influencede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“increasing Si doses positively influenced plant height, dry matter accumulation (DMA), leaf area index (LAI), yield, and nutrient uptake”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 761–897 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si application on wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Grain yield was highest at 8 g Si liter−1, followed by 6 g Si liter−1.

Treatment
8 g Si liter−1e0
Outcome
grain yielde2
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain and straw yield were observed with 8 g Si liter−1, followed by 6 g Si liter−1, while the control had the lowest yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1035 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si application on wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–355 · show in text ↑
e2

“With 8 g Si liter−1, grain yield, straw yield, and Si uptake increased by 10.5%, 13.5%, and 26.3%, respectively, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1173 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Straw yield was highest at 8 g Si liter−1, followed by 6 g Si liter−1.

Treatment
8 g Si liter−1e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest grain and straw yield were observed with 8 g Si liter−1, followed by 6 g Si liter−1, while the control had the lowest yields”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 899–1035 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si application on wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 8 g Si liter−1, wheat grain yield increased 10.5% over control.

Treatment
8 g Si liter−1e0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
10.5%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With 8 g Si liter−1, grain yield, straw yield, and Si uptake increased by 10.5%, 13.5%, and 26.3%, respectively, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1173 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si application on wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 8 g Si liter−1, wheat straw yield increased 13.5% over control.

Treatment
8 g Si liter−1e0
Outcome
straw yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
13.5%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With 8 g Si liter−1, grain yield, straw yield, and Si uptake increased by 10.5%, 13.5%, and 26.3%, respectively, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1173 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si application on wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

At 8 g Si liter−1, wheat silicon uptake increased 26.3% over control.

Treatment
8 g Si liter−1e0
Outcome
Si uptakee0
Direction
increasede0
Value
26.3%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“With 8 g Si liter−1, grain yield, straw yield, and Si uptake increased by 10.5%, 13.5%, and 26.3%, respectively, compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1037–1173 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si application on wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 8 g Si liter−1, S. avenae density decreased 81.4% relative to control.

Treatment
Si application at 8 g Si liter−1e0
Interactor
S. avenaee0pest
Outcome
density of S. avenae (aphids)e0
Direction
reducede0
Value
81.4%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si application at 8 g Si liter−1 significantly reduced the density of S. avenae (aphids) by 81.4% and lodging by 75.1% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1331 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si application on wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

At 8 g Si liter−1, lodging decreased 75.1% relative to control.

Treatment
Si application at 8 g Si liter−1e0
Outcome
lodginge0
Direction
reducede0
Value
75.1%e0
Comparator
controle0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si application at 8 g Si liter−1 significantly reduced the density of S. avenae (aphids) by 81.4% and lodging by 75.1% compared to the control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1189–1331 · show in text ↑
e1

“Si application on wheat growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 325–355 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Tillering-stage application performed better for growth, yield and nutrient uptake.

Treatment
foliar application of Si during the tillering stagee0
Outcome
growth, yield, and nutrient uptakee0
Direction
bettere0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“foliar application of Si during the tillering stage exhibited better performance in terms of growth, yield, and nutrient uptake in wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1526–1662 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend 8 g Si liter−1 at tillering for wheat in southern Rajasthan.

Treatment
Si fertilization at a rate of 8 g Si liter−1 during the tillering stagee0
Outcome
improve growth, productivity, and nutrient uptakee0
Setting
southern region of Rajasthane0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Si fertilization at a rate of 8 g Si liter−1 during the tillering stage can effectively improve growth, productivity, and nutrient uptake in wheat in the southern region of Rajasthan”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1700–1882 · show in text ↑

silicon atom · pest · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

10 papers: 7 positive, 3 negative or no effect

6 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

silicon atom · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

81 papers: 74 positive, 7 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. no effect

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

silicon atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

90 papers: 85 positive, 5 negative or no effect

84 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

86 papers more in this group

See all 90 papers →

silicon atom · nutrient: content · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

61 papers: 58 positive, 3 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

57 papers more in this group

See all 61 papers →

application · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

877 papers: 795 positive, 82 negative or no effect

794 papers in the same direction as this paper · 75 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

873 papers more in this group

See all 877 papers →

tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

1,414 papers: 1,116 positive, 298 negative or no effect

1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

1,410 papers more in this group

See all 1,414 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.