Paper · 2024 · Journal of Advances in Biology & Biotechnology

Effect of Bio-fertilizers on Growth, Yield and Quality of Strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.) CV. Winter Dawn in Prayagraj (U.P.) Conditions

Sumit Singh; Saket Mishra; Vijay Bahadur

9
claims
18
verbatim quotes
0
citations
4
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

The experiment was carried out at Research Field of Horticulture Research Farm, Naini Agricultural Institute, Sam Higginbottom University of Agriculture, Technology and Sciences, Prayagraj (U.P.) India, during Rabi Season 2023-2024 to investigate twelve treatments viz., T0 (RDN (Control), T1 (RDN + Azosprillum@7 kg/ha), T2 (RDN + Phosphate Solubilizing Bacteria @6kg/ha), T3 (RDN + VAM @10kg/ha), T4 (RDN + Azotobacter@7kg/ha), T5 (RDN + Azospirillum@7kg/ha + PSB@ 6kg/ha), T6 (RDN + Azospirillum@7kg/ha + VAM@10kg/ha), T7 (RDN + PSB@6kg/ha + VAM@ 10kg/ha) and T8 (RDN + PSB@6kg/ha + Azotobacter@7kg/ha), T9 (RDN + Azotobacter@7kg/ha + VAM@10kg/ha) , T10 , (RDN+Azotobacter@7kg/ha+ PSB@6kg/ha + VAM@10kg/ha) and T11 (RDN + Azospirillum@7kg/ha + PSB@6kg/ha + VAM@10kg/ha)along with their combinations, replicated thrice in a Randomized Block Design. In strawberry use the application of bio-fertilizer like Azotobacter and Azospirillum hasten early flowering along with the expanded duration of blossoming, harvesting by increasing the growth, yield and quality of strawberry. The integrated nutrient management maximized plant height (cm), number of leaves per plant, plant spread (E-W, N-S) (cm), number of flowers per plant, number of fruit per plant, fruit weight (g), fruit length (cm), fruit diameter (cm), fruit yield (q/ha), total soluble solids, ascorbic acid (mg/100g). From the above experimental finding it may concluded that, the production of strawberry by the bio fertilizer application of T11 (RDN + Azospirillum@7kg/ha + PSB@6kg/ha + VAM@10kg/ha) was found to best in terms of growth, yield and quality. In the investigation improves vegetative growth of flowering and improve yield by the help of bio fertilizer such. The highest net return was also found in the T11 and highest B:C ratio was found in T10 with 3.64.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Azotobacter and Azospirillum biofertilizers hastened strawberry flowering and extended flowering and harvest duration.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
bio-fertilizer like Azotobacter and Azospirillume0
Interactor
AzotobacterAzotobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
AzospirillumAzospirillume0symbiont
Outcome
early floweringe0
Direction
hastene0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azotobacter
Azotobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)DAN H. JONES · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Azospirillum
Azospirillum · Second interactorFadelblaid · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In strawberry use the application of bio-fertilizer like Azotobacter and Azospirillum hasten early flowering along with the expanded duration of blossoming, harvesting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 851–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry (Fragaria x ananassa Duch.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–96 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management maximized strawberry plant height, leaf number and plant spread.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
integrated nutrient managemente0
Outcome
plant height (cm), number of leaves per plant, plant spread (E-W, N-S) (cm)e0
Direction
maximizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The integrated nutrient management maximized plant height (cm), number of leaves per plant, plant spread (E-W, N-S) (cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1198 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management maximized strawberry flower and fruit number.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
integrated nutrient managemente0
Outcome
number of flowers per plant, number of fruit per plante0
Direction
maximizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The integrated nutrient management maximized plant height (cm), number of leaves per plant, plant spread (E-W, N-S) (cm), number of flowers per plant, number of fruit per plant”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1254 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management maximized strawberry fruit weight, length and diameter.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
integrated nutrient managemente0
Outcome
fruit weight (g), fruit length (cm), fruit diameter (cm)e0
Direction
maximizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The integrated nutrient management maximized plant height (cm), number of leaves per plant, plant spread (E-W, N-S) (cm), number of flowers per plant, number of fruit per plant, fruit weight (g), fruit length (cm), fruit diameter (cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1312 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management maximized strawberry fruit yield.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
integrated nutrient managemente0
Outcome
fruit yield (q/ha)e0
Direction
maximizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The integrated nutrient management maximized plant height (cm), number of leaves per plant, plant spread (E-W, N-S) (cm), number of flowers per plant, number of fruit per plant, fruit weight (g), fruit length (cm), fruit diameter (cm), fruit yield (q/ha)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1332 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management maximized strawberry soluble solids and ascorbic acid.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
integrated nutrient managemente0
Outcome
total soluble solids, ascorbic acid (mg/100g)e0
Direction
maximizede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The integrated nutrient management maximized plant height (cm), number of leaves per plant, plant spread (E-W, N-S) (cm), number of flowers per plant, number of fruit per plant, fruit weight (g), fruit length (cm), fruit diameter (cm), fruit yield (q/ha), total soluble solids, ascorbic acid (mg/100g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1078–1379 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Observationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 was judged best for strawberry growth, yield and quality.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
T11 (RDN + Azospirillum@7kg/ha + PSB@6kg/ha + VAM@10kg/ha)e0
Outcome
growth, yield and qualitye0
Direction
beste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“T11 (RDN + Azospirillum@7kg/ha + PSB@6kg/ha + VAM@10kg/ha) was found to best in terms of growth, yield and quality.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1506–1621 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T11 produced the highest net return.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
T11e0
Outcome
net returne0
Direction
higheste0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The highest net return was also found in the T11”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1737–1785 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

T10 produced the highest benefit-cost ratio, 3.64.

Taxon
StrawberryFragaria ×ananassat0
Treatment
T10e0
Outcome
B:C ratioe0
Direction
higheste0
Value
3.64e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Fragaria x ananassa
Fragaria ×ananassa · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest B:C ratio was found in T10 with 3.64”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1790–1834 · show in text ↑
t0

“Strawberry”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–68 · show in text ↑

Azospirillum · phenology · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Azotobacter · phenology · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Results agree

10 papers: 10 positive, 0 negative or no effect

9 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

inoculation · phenology · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

9 papers: 8 positive, 1 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

5 papers more in this group

See all 9 papers →

fertilization · quality: sugar starch · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

83 papers: 74 positive, 9 negative or no effect

73 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

79 papers more in this group

See all 83 papers →

fertilization · yield · Fragaria x ananassa (strawberry)Positive and negative results

229 papers: 193 positive, 36 negative or no effect

192 papers in the same direction as this paper · 34 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

225 papers more in this group

See all 229 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.