Paper · 2024 · Applied Soil Ecology

Co-application of beneficial microorganisms and nanoparticles to improve wheat growth in infected Fusarium culmorum soil

Marayam Kashisaz; Naeimeh Enayatizamir; Pengcheng Fu; et al.

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
10
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Fusarium species are globally recognized as highly detrimental soil-borne plant pathogen, posing a significant threat to various crops. This study investigates the potential of biosynthesized selenium (Se) and TiO 2 nanoparticles (NPs), in conjunction with plant growth-promoting bacteria ( Pseudomonas sp. and Enterobacter cloacae ), to suppress the activity of F. culmorum and assess their impact on wheat growth and yield. Furthermore, the study evaluates the impact of these nanoparticles on selected soil chemical and biological properties. The experiment was conducted in a greenhouse using a completely randomized design. The application of nanoparticles and bacteria reduced the disease severity index and even yielded improvements in all measured properties, compared to uninfected plants. Notably, the combination of TiO 2 NPs and a mixture of bacteria led to a substantial 33.13 % increase in the 1000-grain weight, while TiO 2 NPs+ Pseudomonas and SeNPs+ Pseudomonas treatments enhanced the concentration of phosphorus in grains. The highest selenium content in grains was observed in the SeNPs+mixture of bacteria treatment. In addition, the application of TiO 2 NPs + mixture of bacteria and SeNPs+mixture of bacteria treatments led to an increase in microbial biomass carbon and soil respiration compared to the control group. The utilization of a synergistic approach involving plant growth promoting bacteria and nanoparticles holds great promise for enhancing wheat growth and bolstering its resilience against biotic stress , with the added benefit of Se biofortification in grains. This research underscores the potential of such innovative strategies for sustainable agriculture in the face of plant pathogenic threats.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Nanoparticles and bacteria reduced the disease severity index of wheat infected with Fusarium culmorum.

Treatment
application of nanoparticles and bacteriae2
Interactor
Fusarium culmorumFusarium culmorumt1pathogen
Outcome
disease severity indexe2
Direction
reducede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Fusarium culmorum
Fusarium culmorum · InteractorBarbara Scherm, Virgilio Balmas, Francesca Spanu, Giovanna Pani, Giovanna Delogu, Matias Pasquali, Quirico Migheli · CC BY 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
t1

“Fusarium culmorum”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 98–115 · show in text ↑
e2

“The application of nanoparticles and bacteria reduced the disease severity index”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 629–709 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TiO2 NPs combined with a bacterial mixture increased 1000-grain weight by 33.13%.

Treatment
combination of TiO 2 NPs and a mixture of bacteriae3
Outcome
1000-grain weighte3
Direction
increasee3
Value
33.13 %e3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
e3

“the combination of TiO 2 NPs and a mixture of bacteria led to a substantial 33.13 % increase in the 1000-grain weight”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 808–925 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TiO2 NPs+Pseudomonas and SeNPs+Pseudomonas increased grain phosphorus concentration.

Treatment
TiO 2 NPs+ Pseudomonas and SeNPs+ Pseudomonase4
Outcome
concentration of phosphorus in grainse4
Direction
enhancede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
e4

“TiO 2 NPs+ Pseudomonas and SeNPs+ Pseudomonas treatments enhanced the concentration of phosphorus in grains”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 933–1040 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The highest grain selenium content occurred with SeNPs plus the bacterial mixture.

Treatment
SeNPs+mixture of bacteriae5
Outcome
highest selenium content in grainse5

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
e5

“The highest selenium content in grains was observed in the SeNPs+mixture of bacteria treatment”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1042–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

TiO2 NPs or SeNPs with the bacterial mixture increased soil microbial biomass carbon and respiration compared with the control.

Treatment
TiO 2 NPs + mixture of bacteria and SeNPs+mixture of bacteriae6
Outcome
microbial biomass carbon and soil respiratione6
Direction
increasee6
Comparator
control groupe6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–78 · show in text ↑
e6

“the application of TiO 2 NPs + mixture of bacteria and SeNPs+mixture of bacteria treatments led to an increase in microbial biomass carbon and soil respiration compared to the control group”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1151–1340 · show in text ↑

titanium dioxide · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

2 papers: 1 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
See all 2 papers →

Pseudomonas · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

6 papers: 5 positive, 1 negative or no effect

4 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

titanium dioxide · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

inoculation · Fusarium culmorum · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

17 papers: 11 positive, 6 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. negative

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

nanoparticle · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

45 papers: 43 positive, 2 negative or no effect

42 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

41 papers more in this group

See all 45 papers →

inoculation · soil: biology · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

65 papers: 58 positive, 7 negative or no effect

57 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

61 papers more in this group

See all 65 papers →

nanoparticle · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

260 papers: 242 positive, 18 negative or no effect

241 papers in the same direction as this paper · 18 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

256 papers more in this group

See all 260 papers →

inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

614 papers: 549 positive, 65 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

610 papers more in this group

See all 614 papers →

8 of 9 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.