Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Economic Plants

Growth and Quality Analysis of Baby Corn (Zea mays L.) and Fodder as Influenced by NPK and Zn Fertility under Varying Spatial Geometry in Indo-Gangetic Plain Zone of Bihar

Alka Jyoti Sharma; Mahesh Kumar Singh; Sanjay Kumar; et al.

9
claims
21
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-sa

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during the kharif season (June–August, 2018) at Bihar Agricultural University, Sabour, Bihar, India, to assess the growth and quality of baby corn as influenced by NPK and zinc fertility approaches under varying spatial geometries in Indo-gangetic plain zone of Bihar. The experiment was laid out in split-split-plot design with three levels of spatial geometry, viz. 40×20 cm2 spacing, 50×15 cm2 spacing and paired row planting (30 cm spacing in between two lines in a paired-row; 50 cm between the two paired-rows and 10 cm between plants within a row) in main plot; three levels of fertility viz. 120:60:60, 150:75:75 and 180:90:90 kg N:P2O5:K2O ha-1 in sub-plots; and two levels of zinc viz., 2.5 and 5.0 kg Zn ha-1 in sub-sub plots, replicated thrice. Paired row planting recorded enhanced and significant increase in growth attributes, thereby registering highest baby corn yield (1.43 t ha-1), green fodder yield (26.78 t ha-1) and dry fodder yield (11.46 t ha-1), as compared to conventional planting. 180:90:90 kg N:P2O5:K2O ha-1 and 5.0 kg Zn ha-1 enhanced the growth parameters as well as baby corn, green fodder and dry fodder yield. Paired row planting, NPK fertility @180:90:90 kg N:P2O5:K2O ha-1 and Zn fertility levels @5.0 kg Zn ha-1 also recorded improvement in reducing sugar, protein and zinc content of baby corn as well as nutritional quality of fodder.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-sa. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 9

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired rows increased growth attributes.

Taxon
Baby Cornt0
Treatment
Paired row plantinge0
Outcome
growth attributese0
Direction
increasee0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Paired row planting recorded enhanced and significant increase in growth attributes”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–873 · show in text ↑
t0

“Baby Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired rows yielded 1.43 t ha-1 baby corn, above conventional planting.

Taxon
Baby Cornt0
Treatment
Paired row plantingt1
Outcome
baby corn yielde0
Direction
higheste0
Value
1.43 t ha-1e0
Comparator
conventional plantinge0

Verbatim

e0

“highest baby corn yield (1.43 t ha-1), green fodder yield (26.78 t ha-1) and dry fodder yield (11.46 t ha-1), as compared to conventional planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 895–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Baby Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“Paired row planting recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired rows produced 26.78 t ha-1 green fodder.

Taxon
Baby Cornt0
Treatment
Paired row plantingt1
Outcome
green fodder yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
26.78 t ha-1e0
Comparator
conventional plantinge0

Verbatim

e0

“green fodder yield (26.78 t ha-1) and dry fodder yield (11.46 t ha-1), as compared to conventional planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 934–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Baby Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“Paired row planting recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired rows produced 11.46 t ha-1 dry fodder.

Taxon
Baby Cornt0
Treatment
Paired row plantingt1
Outcome
dry fodder yielde0
Direction
higherinferrede0
Value
11.46 t ha-1e0
Comparator
conventional plantinge0

Verbatim

e0

“dry fodder yield (11.46 t ha-1), as compared to conventional planting”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 972–1041 · show in text ↑
t0

“Baby Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
t1

“Paired row planting recorded”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 790–818 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High NPK fertility enhanced growth and all three yields.

Taxon
Baby Cornt0
Treatment
180:90:90 kg N:P2O5:K2O ha-1e0
Outcome
growth parameters as well as baby corn, green fodder and dry fodder yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“180:90:90 kg N:P2O5:K2O ha-1 and 5.0 kg Zn ha-1 enhanced the growth parameters as well as baby corn, green fodder and dry fodder yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1043–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Baby Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Zinc at 5.0 kg ha-1 enhanced growth and yields.

Taxon
Baby Cornt0
Treatment
5.0 kg Zn ha-1e0
Outcome
growth parameters as well as baby corn, green fodder and dry fodder yielde0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“5.0 kg Zn ha-1 enhanced the growth parameters as well as baby corn, green fodder and dry fodder yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1076–1177 · show in text ↑
t0

“Baby Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Paired planting improved baby corn reducing sugar, protein and zinc content and fodder nutrition.

Taxon
Baby Cornt0
Treatment
Paired row plantinge0
Outcome
reducing sugar, protein and zinc content of baby corne0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Paired row planting, NPK fertility @180:90:90 kg N:P2O5:K2O ha-1 and Zn fertility levels @5.0 kg Zn ha-1 also recorded improvement in reducing sugar, protein and zinc content of baby corn as well as nutritional quality of fodder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1179–1407 · show in text ↑
t0

“Baby Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High NPK improved baby corn composition and fodder nutrition.

Taxon
Baby Cornt0
Treatment
NPK fertility @180:90:90 kg N:P2O5:K2O ha-1e0
Outcome
nutritional quality of foddere0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“NPK fertility @180:90:90 kg N:P2O5:K2O ha-1 and Zn fertility levels @5.0 kg Zn ha-1 also recorded improvement in reducing sugar, protein and zinc content of baby corn as well as nutritional quality of fodder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1200–1407 · show in text ↑
t0

“Baby Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

High zinc improved baby corn composition and fodder nutrition.

Taxon
Baby Cornt0
Treatment
Zn fertility levels @5.0 kg Zn ha-1e0
Outcome
reducing sugar, protein and zinc content of baby corne0
Direction
improvemente0

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“Zn fertility levels @5.0 kg Zn ha-1 also recorded improvement in reducing sugar, protein and zinc content of baby corn as well as nutritional quality of fodder”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1248–1407 · show in text ↑
t0

“Baby Corn”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 31–40 · show in text ↑

zinc atom · quality: protein · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

42 papers: 37 positive, 5 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

38 papers more in this group

See all 42 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Zea mays (maize)Results differ

441 papers: 391 positive, 50 negative or no effect

390 papers in the same direction as this paper · 47 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

437 papers more in this group

See all 441 papers →

phosphorus · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

18 papers: 16 positive, 2 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

14 papers more in this group

See all 18 papers →

fertilization · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

106 papers: 89 positive, 17 negative or no effect

88 papers in the same direction as this paper · 17 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

102 papers more in this group

See all 106 papers →

potassium · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

320 papers: 291 positive, 29 negative or no effect

290 papers in the same direction as this paper · 28 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

316 papers more in this group

See all 320 papers →

phosphorus · yield · Zea mays (maize)Positive and negative results

627 papers: 549 positive, 78 negative or no effect

548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 69 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

623 papers more in this group

See all 627 papers →

potassium · quality: grain · Zea mays (maize)Results agree

11 papers: 11 positive, 0 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.