Abstract
A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural College, Jagtial during Rabi, 2023-24 to evaluate the effect of irrigation schedules and nano fertilizers as foliar spray in chickpea grown under zero tillage conditions. The experiment was laid out in Split plot design with 18 treatment combinations replicated thrice. The treatment includes three irrigation management viz., Residual soil moisture (no irrigation), one irrigation at pod development stage and two irrigations scheduled each at pre flowering and pod development stage as main plot treatments and six sub plot treatments as foliar nutrients viz., 100% RDF (RDF: 20-50-20 NPK kg ha-1), 75% N+ 100% P&K + Nano urea spraying @1250 ml ha-1 at branching initiation, 75% N & P + 100% K + Nano DAP spray @1250 ml ha-1 at branching initiation, 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation, 100% RDF + Urea Spray @ 2% at branching initiation and 100% RDF + DAP Spray @ 2% at branching initiation in sandy clay loam soil. Results revealed that, irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod development recorded significantly higher plant height (41.33 cm), dry matter production (521.5 g m-2), leaf area index (1.32), number of pods plant-1 (30.56), 100 seed weight (27.94 gm), seed yield (1,874 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,594 kg ha-1). Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 16
Claim · model-written summary
Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod development gave significantly higher plant height (41.33 cm) in zero-till chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod developmente0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 41.33 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that, irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod development recorded significantly higher plant height (41.33 cm), dry matter production (521.5 g m-2), leaf area index (1.32), number of pods plant-1 (30.56), 100 seed weight (27.94 gm), seed yield (1,874 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,594 kg ha-1).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod development gave significantly higher dry matter production (521.5 g m-2) in zero-till chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod developmente0
- Outcome
- dry matter productione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 521.5 g m-2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that, irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod development recorded significantly higher plant height (41.33 cm), dry matter production (521.5 g m-2), leaf area index (1.32), number of pods plant-1 (30.56), 100 seed weight (27.94 gm), seed yield (1,874 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,594 kg ha-1).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod development gave significantly higher leaf area index (1.32) in zero-till chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod developmente0
- Outcome
- leaf area indexe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.32e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that, irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod development recorded significantly higher plant height (41.33 cm), dry matter production (521.5 g m-2), leaf area index (1.32), number of pods plant-1 (30.56), 100 seed weight (27.94 gm), seed yield (1,874 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,594 kg ha-1).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod development gave significantly higher number of pods plant-1 (30.56) in zero-till chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod developmente0
- Outcome
- number of pods plant-1e0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 30.56e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that, irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod development recorded significantly higher plant height (41.33 cm), dry matter production (521.5 g m-2), leaf area index (1.32), number of pods plant-1 (30.56), 100 seed weight (27.94 gm), seed yield (1,874 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,594 kg ha-1).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod development gave significantly higher 100 seed weight (27.94 gm) in zero-till chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod developmente0
- Outcome
- 100 seed weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 27.94 gme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that, irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod development recorded significantly higher plant height (41.33 cm), dry matter production (521.5 g m-2), leaf area index (1.32), number of pods plant-1 (30.56), 100 seed weight (27.94 gm), seed yield (1,874 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,594 kg ha-1).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod development gave significantly higher seed yield (1,874 kg ha-1) in zero-till chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod developmente0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1,874 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that, irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod development recorded significantly higher plant height (41.33 cm), dry matter production (521.5 g m-2), leaf area index (1.32), number of pods plant-1 (30.56), 100 seed weight (27.94 gm), seed yield (1,874 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,594 kg ha-1).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod development gave significantly higher haulm yield (4,594 kg ha-1) in zero-till chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod developmente0
- Outcome
- haulm yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4,594 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Results revealed that, irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod development recorded significantly higher plant height (41.33 cm), dry matter production (521.5 g m-2), leaf area index (1.32), number of pods plant-1 (30.56), 100 seed weight (27.94 gm), seed yield (1,874 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,594 kg ha-1).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The foliar nutrient treatment gave significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm) in zero-till chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiatione0
- Outcome
- plant heighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 43.21 cme0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The foliar nutrient treatment gave significantly higher dry matter production (544.9 g m-2) in zero-till chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiatione0
- Outcome
- dry matter productione0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 544.9 g m-2e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The foliar nutrient treatment gave significantly higher leaf area index (1.41) in zero-till chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiatione0
- Outcome
- leaf area indexe0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.41e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The foliar nutrient treatment gave significantly higher number of branches plant-1 (14.11) in zero-till chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiatione0
- Outcome
- number of branches plant-1e0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 14.11e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The foliar nutrient treatment gave significantly higher number of seeds pod-1 (32.24) in zero-till chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiatione0
- Outcome
- number of seeds pod-1e0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 32.24e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The foliar nutrient treatment gave significantly higher 100 seed weight (29.94g) in zero-till chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiatione0
- Outcome
- 100 seed weighte0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 29.94ge0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The foliar nutrient treatment gave significantly higher number of pod plant-1 (1.30) in zero-till chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiatione0
- Outcome
- number of pod plant-1e0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1.30e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The foliar nutrient treatment gave significantly higher seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) in zero-till chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiatione0
- Outcome
- seed yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 1,943 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
Claim · model-written summary
The foliar nutrient treatment gave significantly higher haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1) in zero-till chickpea.
- Taxon
- chickpea
Cicer arietinumt0 - Treatment
- 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiatione0
- Outcome
- haulm yielde0
- Direction
- highere0
- Value
- 4,732 kg ha-1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Verbatim
e0“Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).”
t0“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”
The same questions in other papers
irrigation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ
26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction
- negative
- negative
- negative
37 papers more in this group
See all 41 papers →application · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
69 papers more in this group
See all 73 papers →fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- negative
101 papers more in this group
See all 105 papers →irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
120 papers more in this group
See all 124 papers →application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
172 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
173 papers more in this group
See all 177 papers →fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results
325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.