Paper · 2024 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of irrigation levels and foliar nutrition with nano fertilizers on growth and yield of zero till chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)

N Chandu; N Mahesh; O Sampath; et al.

16
claims
32
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted at Agricultural College, Jagtial during Rabi, 2023-24 to evaluate the effect of irrigation schedules and nano fertilizers as foliar spray in chickpea grown under zero tillage conditions. The experiment was laid out in Split plot design with 18 treatment combinations replicated thrice. The treatment includes three irrigation management viz., Residual soil moisture (no irrigation), one irrigation at pod development stage and two irrigations scheduled each at pre flowering and pod development stage as main plot treatments and six sub plot treatments as foliar nutrients viz., 100% RDF (RDF: 20-50-20 NPK kg ha-1), 75% N+ 100% P&K + Nano urea spraying @1250 ml ha-1 at branching initiation, 75% N & P + 100% K + Nano DAP spray @1250 ml ha-1 at branching initiation, 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation, 100% RDF + Urea Spray @ 2% at branching initiation and 100% RDF + DAP Spray @ 2% at branching initiation in sandy clay loam soil. Results revealed that, irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod development recorded significantly higher plant height (41.33 cm), dry matter production (521.5 g m-2), leaf area index (1.32), number of pods plant-1 (30.56), 100 seed weight (27.94 gm), seed yield (1,874 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,594 kg ha-1). Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 16

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod development gave significantly higher plant height (41.33 cm) in zero-till chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod developmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
41.33 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that, irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod development recorded significantly higher plant height (41.33 cm), dry matter production (521.5 g m-2), leaf area index (1.32), number of pods plant-1 (30.56), 100 seed weight (27.94 gm), seed yield (1,874 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,594 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod development gave significantly higher dry matter production (521.5 g m-2) in zero-till chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod developmente0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
highere0
Value
521.5 g m-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that, irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod development recorded significantly higher plant height (41.33 cm), dry matter production (521.5 g m-2), leaf area index (1.32), number of pods plant-1 (30.56), 100 seed weight (27.94 gm), seed yield (1,874 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,594 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod development gave significantly higher leaf area index (1.32) in zero-till chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod developmente0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.32e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that, irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod development recorded significantly higher plant height (41.33 cm), dry matter production (521.5 g m-2), leaf area index (1.32), number of pods plant-1 (30.56), 100 seed weight (27.94 gm), seed yield (1,874 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,594 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod development gave significantly higher number of pods plant-1 (30.56) in zero-till chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod developmente0
Outcome
number of pods plant-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
30.56e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that, irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod development recorded significantly higher plant height (41.33 cm), dry matter production (521.5 g m-2), leaf area index (1.32), number of pods plant-1 (30.56), 100 seed weight (27.94 gm), seed yield (1,874 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,594 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod development gave significantly higher 100 seed weight (27.94 gm) in zero-till chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod developmente0
Outcome
100 seed weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
27.94 gme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that, irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod development recorded significantly higher plant height (41.33 cm), dry matter production (521.5 g m-2), leaf area index (1.32), number of pods plant-1 (30.56), 100 seed weight (27.94 gm), seed yield (1,874 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,594 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod development gave significantly higher seed yield (1,874 kg ha-1) in zero-till chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod developmente0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1,874 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that, irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod development recorded significantly higher plant height (41.33 cm), dry matter production (521.5 g m-2), leaf area index (1.32), number of pods plant-1 (30.56), 100 seed weight (27.94 gm), seed yield (1,874 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,594 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Two irrigations at pre-flowering and pod development gave significantly higher haulm yield (4,594 kg ha-1) in zero-till chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod developmente0
Outcome
haulm yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
4,594 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Results revealed that, irrigations scheduling at pre-flowering and pod development recorded significantly higher plant height (41.33 cm), dry matter production (521.5 g m-2), leaf area index (1.32), number of pods plant-1 (30.56), 100 seed weight (27.94 gm), seed yield (1,874 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,594 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 989–1307 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The foliar nutrient treatment gave significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm) in zero-till chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiatione0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
43.21 cme0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1706 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The foliar nutrient treatment gave significantly higher dry matter production (544.9 g m-2) in zero-till chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiatione0
Outcome
dry matter productione0
Direction
highere0
Value
544.9 g m-2e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1706 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The foliar nutrient treatment gave significantly higher leaf area index (1.41) in zero-till chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiatione0
Outcome
leaf area indexe0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.41e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1706 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The foliar nutrient treatment gave significantly higher number of branches plant-1 (14.11) in zero-till chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiatione0
Outcome
number of branches plant-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
14.11e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1706 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The foliar nutrient treatment gave significantly higher number of seeds pod-1 (32.24) in zero-till chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiatione0
Outcome
number of seeds pod-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
32.24e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1706 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The foliar nutrient treatment gave significantly higher 100 seed weight (29.94g) in zero-till chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiatione0
Outcome
100 seed weighte0
Direction
highere0
Value
29.94ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1706 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The foliar nutrient treatment gave significantly higher number of pod plant-1 (1.30) in zero-till chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiatione0
Outcome
number of pod plant-1e0
Direction
highere0
Value
1.30e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1706 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The foliar nutrient treatment gave significantly higher seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) in zero-till chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiatione0
Outcome
seed yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
1,943 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1706 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The foliar nutrient treatment gave significantly higher haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1) in zero-till chickpea.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiatione0
Outcome
haulm yielde0
Direction
highere0
Value
4,732 kg ha-1e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Among the foliar nutrients application of 100% RDF + 19-19-19 Spray @ 0.5% at branching initiation had shown significantly higher plant height (43.21 cm), dry matter production (544.9 g m-2), leaf area index (1.41), number of branches plant-1 (14.11), number of seeds pod-1 (32.24), 100 seed weight (29.94g), number of pod plant-1 (1.30), seed yield (1,943 kg ha-1) and haulm yield (4,732 kg ha-1).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1308–1706 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 104–133 · show in text ↑

irrigation · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

41 papers: 27 positive, 14 negative or no effect

26 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

37 papers more in this group

See all 41 papers →

application · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

73 papers: 69 positive, 4 negative or no effect

68 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

69 papers more in this group

See all 73 papers →

fertilization · growth · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

105 papers: 99 positive, 6 negative or no effect

98 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

101 papers more in this group

See all 105 papers →

irrigation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

124 papers: 113 positive, 11 negative or no effect

112 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

120 papers more in this group

See all 124 papers →

application · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

177 papers: 173 positive, 4 negative or no effect

172 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

173 papers more in this group

See all 177 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.