Paper · 2024 · Journal of Plant Nutrition

Co-application effects of rice husk biochar and different types of nitrogen fertilizers on rice yield, yield components, and nitrogen use efficiency

Seyedeh Hajar Banihashemian; Ali Eftekhari; Morteza Nasiri; et al.

10
claims
25
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
—
Not open access

Abstract

The Nitrogen (N) recovery index in rice paddy soils has never been exceeded by more than 30%, regardless of using proven fertilizer management strategies and amounting to significant N being out of rice plant use. Biochar application and the newly released N biofertilizers (singly or in combination) increase the N use efficiency by increasing the soil nutrient retention capacity. Therefore, a two-year pot experiment was conducted to explore the effects of the co-application of rice husk biochar and nitrogen fertilizers on rice yield, yield components, and nitrogen use efficiency indexes. The applied treatments were rice husk biochar at three levels (0, 20, and 40 tha−1) and N fertilizers at three levels (0, chemical (Urea), and N-biofertilizer). The most effective combination treatments (200 kg N ha−1 in source of urea plus 40 tha−1 rice husk biochar) significantly (p ≤ 0.01) increased the grain yield (2.38 times), straw and biological yield (2.83 and 2.62 times, respectively), N content of soil N (59%), nitrogen uptake efficiency (2.92 times), and nitrogen internal efficiency (59%), whereas, nitrogen recovery efficiency decreased by about 52%. Moreover, the maximum increase in N content of grain and harvest index was recorded at combination application of 20 tha−1 biochar plus urea by about 48 and 15%, respectively. It can be concluded that the co-application of rice husk biochar and N fertilizers has substantial advantages over their single applications in terms of N fertilizer recovery, N uptake. Thus, it might be an effective way to enhance rice yield.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 10

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Urea plus 40 tha−1 biochar increased rice grain yield 2.38 times.

Treatment
200 kg N ha−1 in source of urea plus 40 tha−1 rice husk biochare0
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
increasede0
Value
2.38 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“200 kg N ha−1 in source of urea plus 40 tha−1 rice husk biochar) significantly (p ≤ 0.01) increased the grain yield (2.38 times)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“on rice yield, yield components, and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination increased straw yield 2.83 times.

Treatment
200 kg N ha−1 in source of urea plus 40 tha−1 rice husk biochare1
Outcome
strawe0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
2.83e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw and biological yield (2.83 and 2.62 times, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“on rice yield, yield components, and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–148 · show in text ↑
e1

“200 kg N ha−1 in source of urea plus 40 tha−1 rice husk biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination increased biological yield 2.62 times.

Treatment
200 kg N ha−1 in source of urea plus 40 tha−1 rice husk biochare1
Outcome
biological yielde0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
2.62 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“straw and biological yield (2.83 and 2.62 times, respectively)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 929–991 · show in text ↑
t0

“on rice yield, yield components, and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–148 · show in text ↑
e1

“200 kg N ha−1 in source of urea plus 40 tha−1 rice husk biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination increased soil nitrogen content 59%.

Treatment
200 kg N ha−1 in source of urea plus 40 tha−1 rice husk biochare1
Outcome
N content of soil Ne0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
59%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“N content of soil N (59%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 993–1018 · show in text ↑
t0

“on rice yield, yield components, and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–148 · show in text ↑
e1

“200 kg N ha−1 in source of urea plus 40 tha−1 rice husk biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination increased nitrogen uptake efficiency 2.92 times.

Treatment
200 kg N ha−1 in source of urea plus 40 tha−1 rice husk biochare1
Outcome
nitrogen uptake efficiencye0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
2.92 timese0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen uptake efficiency (2.92 times)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1020–1059 · show in text ↑
t0

“on rice yield, yield components, and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–148 · show in text ↑
e1

“200 kg N ha−1 in source of urea plus 40 tha−1 rice husk biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination increased nitrogen internal efficiency 59%.

Treatment
200 kg N ha−1 in source of urea plus 40 tha−1 rice husk biochare1
Outcome
nitrogen internal efficiencye0
Direction
increaseinferrede0
Value
59%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen internal efficiency (59%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1065–1099 · show in text ↑
t0

“on rice yield, yield components, and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–148 · show in text ↑
e1

“200 kg N ha−1 in source of urea plus 40 tha−1 rice husk biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The combination decreased nitrogen recovery efficiency about 52%.

Treatment
200 kg N ha−1 in source of urea plus 40 tha−1 rice husk biochare1
Outcome
nitrogen recovery efficiencye0
Direction
decreasede0
Value
about 52%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“nitrogen recovery efficiency decreased by about 52%.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1110–1162 · show in text ↑
t0

“on rice yield, yield components, and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–148 · show in text ↑
e1

“200 kg N ha−1 in source of urea plus 40 tha−1 rice husk biochar”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 799–862 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar at 20 tha−1 plus urea increased grain nitrogen content about 48%.

Treatment
20 tha−1 biochar plus ureae0
Outcome
N content of graine0
Direction
increasee0
Value
about 48e0
Qualifier
respectivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum increase in N content of grain and harvest index was recorded at combination application of 20 tha−1 biochar plus urea by about 48 and 15%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1338 · show in text ↑
t0

“on rice yield, yield components, and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–148 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Biochar at 20 tha−1 plus urea increased harvest index about 15%.

Treatment
20 tha−1 biochar plus ureae0
Outcome
harvest indexe0
Direction
increasee0
Value
15%e0
Qualifier
respectivelye0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“the maximum increase in N content of grain and harvest index was recorded at combination application of 20 tha−1 biochar plus urea by about 48 and 15%, respectively.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1173–1338 · show in text ↑
t0

“on rice yield, yield components, and nitrogen use efficiency”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 88–148 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors concluded combined biochar and nitrogen fertilizer can enhance rice yield.

Outcome
enhance rice yielde0
Qualifier
mighte0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Oryza sativa
Oryza sativa · Taxon · picture from its Wikimedia Commons categoryDesmanthus4food · CC BY-SA 3.0 us · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Thus, it might be an effective way to enhance rice yield.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1525–1582 · show in text ↑

biochar · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

19 papers: 14 positive, 5 negative or no effect

13 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. negative
  3. no effect

15 papers more in this group

See all 19 papers →

biochar · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

86 papers: 81 positive, 5 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

82 papers more in this group

See all 86 papers →

biochar · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

147 papers: 135 positive, 12 negative or no effect

134 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. negative

143 papers more in this group

See all 147 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: efficiency · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

262 papers: 217 positive, 45 negative or no effect

216 papers in the same direction as this paper · 41 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

258 papers more in this group

See all 262 papers →

nitrogen · nutrient: content · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

464 papers: 409 positive, 55 negative or no effect

408 papers in the same direction as this paper · 52 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

460 papers more in this group

See all 464 papers →

nitrogen · yield · Oryza sativa (rice)Positive and negative results

2,045 papers: 1,803 positive, 242 negative or no effect

1,802 papers in the same direction as this paper · 193 in the opposite direction · 49 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

2,041 papers more in this group

See all 2,045 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.