Paper · 2024 · Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences, H. Botany/Egyptian Academic Journal of Biological Sciences, H. Botany

Harnessing Spirulina Extract to Enhance Drought Tolerance in Wheat: A Morphological, Molecular Genetic and Molecular Docking Approach

Mona I. M. Ibrahim; Alshimaa T. Ahmed; Khaled A. El-Dougdoug; et al.

15
claims
30
verbatim quotes
1
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.), a globally important staple crop, faces significant production challenges due to climate change, particularly drought stress. Spirulina is known for its high nutritional value and potential biostimulant properties. Therefore, this study investigated Spirulina platensis extract (SpEx) potential to mitigate drought stress effects in wheat, integrating morphological measurements, gene expression data, and molecular docking. SpEx treatment significantly mitigated drought-induced reductions in plant height (18.2%), fresh weight (29.7%), and dry weight (15.7%). Gene expression analysis demonstrated upregulation of stress-responsive genes under SpEx treatment, with peroxidase showing the highest increase (6.13-fold) at 20 mg/ml SpEx concentration, followed by cytochrome P450 (5.23-fold), protein kinase (4.56-fold), and UDPGT (3.67-fold). GC-mass spectrometry analysis of SpEx revealed 27 bioactive compounds. Molecular docking studies of the SpEx-derived compounds with six key proteins (UDPGT, Cytochrome P450, Peroxidase, Protein kinase, ROS, and PCD) revealed varying binding affinities. Four compounds (Araguspongin, Lupeol, Silybin, and Strophanthidine) showed strong interactions with ROS and PCD proteins, exhibiting binding affinities superior to control ligands. ADMET analysis of these four compounds against ROS and PCD proteins demonstrated favorable pharmacological properties, with Araguspongin and Strophanthidine showing high GI absorption and all compounds complying with Lipinski's Rule of Five. Hierarchical cluster analysis of both morphological and gene expression data confirmed distinct grouping patterns between treated and untreated plants. These findings suggest that SpEx enhances wheat drought tolerance through multiple mechanisms, including improved morphological adaptations, enhanced stress-responsive gene expression, and molecular interactions with key stress-related proteins, offering promising applications for sustainable agriculture under water-limited conditions.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 15

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SpEx mitigated drought reduction in wheat plant height by 18.2%.

Treatment
SpEx treatmente0
Outcome
plant heighte0
Direction
mitigatede0
Value
18.2%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SpEx treatment significantly mitigated drought-induced reductions in plant height (18.2%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–544 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SpEx mitigated drought reduction in wheat fresh weight by 29.7%.

Treatment
SpEx treatmente0
Outcome
fresh weighte0
Direction
mitigatede0
Value
29.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SpEx treatment significantly mitigated drought-induced reductions in plant height (18.2%), fresh weight (29.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–566 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

SpEx mitigated drought reduction in wheat dry weight by 15.7%.

Treatment
SpEx treatmente0
Outcome
dry weighte0
Direction
mitigatede0
Value
15.7%e0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“SpEx treatment significantly mitigated drought-induced reductions in plant height (18.2%), fresh weight (29.7%), and dry weight (15.7%)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 455–590 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Peroxidase expression rose 6.13-fold under 20 mg/ml SpEx.

Treatment
20 mg/ml SpEx concentratione0
Gene
peroxidasee0
Outcome
peroxidasee0
Direction
increasee0
Value
6.13-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“peroxidase showing the highest increase (6.13-fold) at 20 mg/ml SpEx concentration”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 697–779 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cytochrome P450 expression rose 5.23-fold under SpEx.

Treatment
SpEx treatmente0
Gene
cytochrome P450e0
Outcome
cytochrome P450e0
Direction
upregulatione0
Value
5.23-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gene expression analysis demonstrated upregulation of stress-responsive genes under SpEx treatment, with peroxidase showing the highest increase (6.13-fold) at 20 mg/ml SpEx concentration, followed by cytochrome P450 (5.23-fold)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–820 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Protein kinase expression rose 4.56-fold under SpEx.

Treatment
SpEx treatmente0
Gene
protein kinasee0
Outcome
protein kinasee0
Direction
upregulatione0
Value
4.56-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gene expression analysis demonstrated upregulation of stress-responsive genes under SpEx treatment, with peroxidase showing the highest increase (6.13-fold) at 20 mg/ml SpEx concentration, followed by cytochrome P450 (5.23-fold), protein kinase (4.56-fold)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–848 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

UDPGT expression rose 3.67-fold under SpEx.

Treatment
SpEx treatmente0
Gene
UDPGTe0
Outcome
UDPGTe0
Direction
upregulatione0
Value
3.67-folde0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Gene expression analysis demonstrated upregulation of stress-responsive genes under SpEx treatment, with peroxidase showing the highest increase (6.13-fold) at 20 mg/ml SpEx concentration, followed by cytochrome P450 (5.23-fold), protein kinase (4.56-fold), and UDPGT (3.67-fold)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 592–871 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

SpEx contained 27 bioactive compounds.

Outcome
bioactive compoundse0
Value
27e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“GC-mass spectrometry analysis of SpEx revealed 27 bioactive compounds”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 873–942 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Araguspongin showed strong docking interaction with ROS and PCD proteins.

Compound
Araguspongine0
Outcome
strong interactions with ROS and PCD proteinse0
Comparator
control ligandse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four compounds (Araguspongin, Lupeol, Silybin, and Strophanthidine) showed strong interactions with ROS and PCD proteins, exhibiting binding affinities superior to control ligands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Lupeol showed strong docking interaction with ROS and PCD proteins.

Compound
Lupeole0
Outcome
strong interactions with ROS and PCD proteinse0
Comparator
control ligandse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four compounds (Araguspongin, Lupeol, Silybin, and Strophanthidine) showed strong interactions with ROS and PCD proteins, exhibiting binding affinities superior to control ligands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Silybin showed strong docking interaction with ROS and PCD proteins.

Compound
Silybine0
Outcome
strong interactions with ROS and PCD proteinse0
Comparator
control ligandse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four compounds (Araguspongin, Lupeol, Silybin, and Strophanthidine) showed strong interactions with ROS and PCD proteins, exhibiting binding affinities superior to control ligands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Strophanthidine showed strong docking interaction with ROS and PCD proteins.

Compound
Strophanthidinee0
Outcome
strong interactions with ROS and PCD proteinse0
Comparator
control ligandse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Four compounds (Araguspongin, Lupeol, Silybin, and Strophanthidine) showed strong interactions with ROS and PCD proteins, exhibiting binding affinities superior to control ligands”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1305 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

Araguspongin and Strophanthidine had high GI absorption in ADMET analysis.

Outcome
high GI absorptione0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Araguspongin and Strophanthidine showing high GI absorption”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1431–1490 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivesimulated

Claim · model-written summary

All four docked compounds complied with Lipinski’s Rule of Five.

Outcome
complying with Lipinski's Rule of Fivee0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“all compounds complying with Lipinski's Rule of Five”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1495–1547 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Morphological and gene expression data separated treated from untreated plants in clusters.

Outcome
distinct grouping patternse0
Comparator
untreated plantse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Hierarchical cluster analysis of both morphological and gene expression data confirmed distinct grouping patterns between treated and untreated plants”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1549–1699 · show in text ↑
t0

“Wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 61–66 · show in text ↑

Limnospira platensis · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

4 papers: 4 positive, 0 negative or no effect

3 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive
See all 4 papers →

botanical · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 17 positive, 7 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

botanical · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

24 papers: 17 positive, 7 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

20 papers more in this group

See all 24 papers →

botanical · molecular: metabolites · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

40 papers: 28 positive, 12 negative or no effect

27 papers in the same direction as this paper · 12 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

36 papers more in this group

See all 40 papers →

botanical · growth · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

435 papers: 206 positive, 229 negative or no effect

205 papers in the same direction as this paper · 228 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

431 papers more in this group

See all 435 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.