Paper · 2025 · Scientific Reports

Enhancing chickpea yield through the application of sulfur and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria

Jafar Nabati; Afsaneh Yousefi; Alireza Hasanfard; et al.

5
claims
10
verbatim quotes
5
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by-nc-nd

Abstract

Plant growth-promoting microorganisms can enhance sulfur uptake and boost crop production. This study was conducted to evaluate the changes in physiology, metabolism, and yield of chickpeas following the application of sulfur and two microbial consortia: (1) Thiobacillus sp., Bacillus subtilis, Paraburkholderia fungorum, and Paenibacillus sp.; and (2) Enterobacter sp. and Pseudomonas sp. The soil amendment involving a combination of sulfur and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) in any quantity had positive effects on the availability of phosphorus, nitrogen, and potassium in the soil. A combination of 90% sulfur with Enterobacter sp. and Pseudomonas sp. resulted in a decrease in soil pH after harvesting in both years. Both years showed a strong correlation between soil pH and soil macronutrient concentration. In both years, the maximum grain yield was achieved through a combination of increased sulfur levels and SOB. The results reveal that sulfur application and SOB can increase nutrient availability, nutrient uptake, and yield of chickpea growth in calcareous soils.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by-nc-nd. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur plus sulfur-oxidizing bacteria improved soil phosphorus, nitrogen and potassium availability.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
combination of sulfur and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB)e0
Interactor
sulfur-oxidizing bacteriae0symbiont
Outcome
availability of phosphorus, nitrogen, and potassium in the soile0
Direction
positive effectse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The soil amendment involving a combination of sulfur and sulfur-oxidizing bacteria (SOB) in any quantity had positive effects on the availability of phosphorus, nitrogen, and potassium in the soil.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 391–588 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 90% sulfur treatment with Enterobacter and Pseudomonas lowered postharvest soil pH in both years.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
90% sulfur with Enterobacter sp. and Pseudomonas sp.e0
Interactor
Enterobacter sp.Enterobactere0symbiont
Second interactor
Pseudomonas sp.Pseudomonase0symbiont
Outcome
soil pHe0
Direction
decreasee0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Enterobacter
Enterobacter · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Pseudomonas
Pseudomonas · Second interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)CDC · Public domain · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“A combination of 90% sulfur with Enterobacter sp. and Pseudomonas sp. resulted in a decrease in soil pH after harvesting in both years.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–724 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
Associationobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Soil pH and macronutrient concentration were strongly correlated in both years.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Outcome
correlation between soil pH and soil macronutrient concentratione0
Qualifier
Both yearse0

Not reportedSettingDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Both years showed a strong correlation between soil pH and soil macronutrient concentration.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 725–817 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Increased sulfur levels with sulfur-oxidizing bacteria produced maximum grain yield in both years.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
increased sulfur levels and SOBe0
Interactor
SOBe0symbiont
Outcome
grain yielde0
Direction
maximume0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“In both years, the maximum grain yield was achieved through a combination of increased sulfur levels and SOB.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 818–927 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sulfur with sulfur-oxidizing bacteria increased chickpea nutrient uptake.

Taxon
chickpeaCicer arietinume0
Treatment
sulfur application and SOBe0
Interactor
SOBe0symbiont
Outcome
nutrient uptakee0
Direction
increasee0
Setting
calcareous soilse0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“The results reveal that sulfur application and SOB can increase nutrient availability, nutrient uptake, and yield of chickpea growth in calcareous soils.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 928–1081 · show in text ↑
t0

“chickpea”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 10–18 · show in text ↑

sulfur atom · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

17 papers: 17 positive, 0 negative or no effect

16 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

13 papers more in this group

See all 17 papers →

sulfur atom · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results agree

37 papers: 37 positive, 0 negative or no effect

36 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

33 papers more in this group

See all 37 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 57 positive, 6 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.