Abstract
In order to explore the effect of different silage microbial inoculants on the silage quality of WL358HQ Alfalfa (Medicago sativa L.), the test consists of the following six treatments: Xinlaiwang I—straw silage inoculant (A), Xinlaiwang I—alfalfa silage inoculant (B), Zhuang Le Mei silage inoculant (C), Baoshiqing (D), KOFASIL S lactic acid bacteria silage inoculant (E) and distilled water (F). Nutritional and fermentation indexes were determined after 60 days of natural fermentation at room temperature. The results showed that the contents of crude protein (CP) and water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) of the B treatment were higher than other treatments. The Relative Feed Value (RFV) of the B treatment was high, the lactic acid (LA) content of the B treatment was significantly increased (p < 0.05) and the contents of neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), pH and ammoniacal nitrogen/total nitrogen (AN/TN) of the B treatment were low. The results showed that treatment B has the best ensilage effect and the highest ensilage membership function, which can effectively improve the quality of WL358 alfalfa silage.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 7
Claim · model-written summary
The alfalfa silage inoculant B treatment had higher crude protein and water-soluble carbohydrate contents than other treatments.
- Taxon
- Alfalfa
Medicago sativat0 - Material
- WL358HQt0
- Treatment
- alfalfa silage inoculante1
- Outcome
- crude protein (CP) and water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC)e2
- Direction
- highere2
- Comparator
- other treatmentse2
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Xinlaiwang I—alfalfa silage inoculant (B)”
e2“the contents of crude protein (CP) and water-soluble carbohydrate (WSC) of the B treatment were higher than other treatments”
t0“Silage Quality of WL358HQ Alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
The relative feed value of the alfalfa silage inoculant B treatment was high.
- Taxon
- AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
- Material
- WL358HQt0
- Treatment
- B treatmente3
- Outcome
- Relative Feed Value (RFV)e3
- Direction
- highe3
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Xinlaiwang I—alfalfa silage inoculant (B)”
e3“The Relative Feed Value (RFV) of the B treatment was high”
t0“Silage Quality of WL358HQ Alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Lactic acid content of the alfalfa silage inoculant B treatment was significantly increased.
- Taxon
- AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
- Material
- WL358HQt0
- Treatment
- B treatmente4
- Outcome
- lactic acid (LA) contente4
- Direction
- significantly increasede4
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Xinlaiwang I—alfalfa silage inoculant (B)”
e4“the lactic acid (LA) content of the B treatment was significantly increased (p < 0.05)”
t0“Silage Quality of WL358HQ Alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Neutral detergent fiber, acid detergent fiber and pH were low in the alfalfa silage inoculant B treatment.
- Taxon
- AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
- Material
- WL358HQt0
- Treatment
- B treatmente5
- Outcome
- neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), pHe5
- Direction
- lowe5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Xinlaiwang I—alfalfa silage inoculant (B)”
e5“the contents of neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), pH and ammoniacal nitrogen/total nitrogen (AN/TN) of the B treatment were low”
t0“Silage Quality of WL358HQ Alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Ammoniacal nitrogen/total nitrogen was low in the alfalfa silage inoculant B treatment.
- Taxon
- AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
- Material
- WL358HQt0
- Treatment
- B treatmente5
- Outcome
- ammoniacal nitrogen/total nitrogen (AN/TN)e5
- Direction
- lowe5
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e1“Xinlaiwang I—alfalfa silage inoculant (B)”
e5“the contents of neutral detergent fiber (NDF), acid detergent fiber (ADF), pH and ammoniacal nitrogen/total nitrogen (AN/TN) of the B treatment were low”
t0“Silage Quality of WL358HQ Alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment B had the best ensilage effect on WL358HQ alfalfa.
- Taxon
- AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
- Material
- WL358HQt0
- Treatment
- treatment Be6
- Outcome
- ensilage effecte6
- Direction
- beste6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“treatment B has the best ensilage effect and the highest ensilage membership function”
t0“Silage Quality of WL358HQ Alfalfa”
Claim · model-written summary
Treatment B had the highest ensilage membership function on WL358HQ alfalfa.
- Taxon
- AlfalfaMedicago sativat0
- Material
- WL358HQt0
- Treatment
- treatment Be6
- Outcome
- ensilage membership functione6
- Direction
- higheste6
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e6“treatment B has the best ensilage effect and the highest ensilage membership function”
t0“Silage Quality of WL358HQ Alfalfa”
The same questions in other papers
boron atom · molecular: metabolites · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
boron atom · quality: grain · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
2 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- positive
- positive
processing · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
14 papers in the same direction as this paper · 5 in the opposite direction
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
16 papers more in this group
See all 20 papers →inoculation · quality: protein · Medicago sativa (alfalfa)Positive and negative results
21 papers in the same direction as this paper · 3 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- negative
21 papers more in this group
See all 25 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.