Abstract
Aim. To investigate the features of the formation of crop yield and productivity of short-rotation grain crop rotation crops depending on soil cultivation systems under renewable agriculture and to develop effective agrotechnological measures to increase the productivity and sustainability of agroecosystems and preserve soil fertility. Methods. field, statistical, laboratory. Results. The influence of various main tillage and fertilization systems on the formation of crop yield and productivity in short-rotation grain crop rotation under renewable agriculture of the Forest-Steppe was established. Research in 2021–2024 showed that the yield of grain crops largely depends on the combination of soil cultivation methods, fertilization levels, and weather conditions. The highest yield of winter wheat (5.31 t/ha) and soybeans (3.37 t/ha) was obtained under adaptive tillage and organic-mineral fertilization system (by-products + N65P60K70 per hectare of crop rotation area). The highest yield of oats and millet was provided by adaptive and combined systems of main tillage under organic-mineral fertilization system at the level of 4.40–4.42 and 3.64–3.75 t/ha, respectively. It was found that fertilization with by-products and mineral fertilizers increases the yield of short-rotation crops by 35.1–54.2% under all tillage systems. Conclusions. The use of differentiated and combined systems of main tillage ensured the formation of the highest level of productivity of short-rotation grain crop rotation - 5.21 and 5.14 t/ha of arable land, respectively, which is 5.6 and 4.3% higher than the level of productivity under the shelf-based variable-depth system (control). In contrast, annual shelf-free tillage: flat-cutting, shallow disking (10–12 cm), and primarily surface disking (6–8 cm), caused a significant decrease (by 8.3–19.5%) of this indicator to 4.51–3.96 t/ha of arable land.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 8
Claim · model-written summary
Winter wheat had its highest yield of 5.31 t/ha under adaptive tillage and organic-mineral fertilization.
- Taxon
- winter wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- adaptive tillage and organic-mineral fertilization system (by-products + N65P60K70 per hectare of crop rotation area)e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 5.31 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield of winter wheat (5.31 t/ha) and soybeans (3.37 t/ha) was obtained under adaptive tillage and organic-mineral fertilization system (by-products + N65P60K70 per hectare of crop rotation area).”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybeans had their highest yield of 3.37 t/ha under adaptive tillage and organic-mineral fertilization.
- Taxon
- soybeans
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- adaptive tillage and organic-mineral fertilization system (by-products + N65P60K70 per hectare of crop rotation area)e0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 3.37 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield of winter wheat (5.31 t/ha) and soybeans (3.37 t/ha) was obtained under adaptive tillage and organic-mineral fertilization system (by-products + N65P60K70 per hectare of crop rotation area).”
Claim · model-written summary
Adaptive and combined tillage with organic-mineral fertilization gave the highest oat yield, 4.40–4.42 t/ha.
- Taxon
- oats
Avena sativae0 - Treatment
- adaptive and combined systems of main tillage under organic-mineral fertilization systeme0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 4.40–4.42e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield of oats and millet was provided by adaptive and combined systems of main tillage under organic-mineral fertilization system at the level of 4.40–4.42 and 3.64–3.75 t/ha, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
Adaptive and combined tillage with organic-mineral fertilization gave the highest millet yield, 3.64–3.75 t/ha.
- Taxon
- millete0
- Treatment
- adaptive and combined systems of main tillage under organic-mineral fertilization systeme0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- higheste0
- Value
- 3.64–3.75 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“The highest yield of oats and millet was provided by adaptive and combined systems of main tillage under organic-mineral fertilization system at the level of 4.40–4.42 and 3.64–3.75 t/ha, respectively.”
Claim · model-written summary
By-products and mineral fertilizers increased short-rotation crop yield by 35.1–54.2% across tillage systems.
- Taxon
- short-rotation cropse0
- Treatment
- fertilization with by-products and mineral fertilizerse0
- Outcome
- yielde0
- Direction
- increasese0
- Value
- 35.1–54.2%e0
- Qualifier
- under all tillage systemse0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“fertilization with by-products and mineral fertilizers increases the yield of short-rotation crops by 35.1–54.2% under all tillage systems”
Claim · model-written summary
Differentiated tillage produced rotation productivity of 5.21 t/ha, 5.6% above the control.
Verbatim
e0“The use of differentiated and combined systems of main tillage ensured the formation of the highest level of productivity of short-rotation grain crop rotation - 5.21 and 5.14 t/ha of arable land, respectively, which is 5.6 and 4.3% higher than the level of productivity under the shelf-based variable-depth system (control).”
t0“grain crop rotation crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Combined tillage produced rotation productivity of 5.14 t/ha, 4.3% above the control.
Verbatim
e0“The use of differentiated and combined systems of main tillage ensured the formation of the highest level of productivity of short-rotation grain crop rotation - 5.21 and 5.14 t/ha of arable land, respectively, which is 5.6 and 4.3% higher than the level of productivity under the shelf-based variable-depth system (control).”
t0“grain crop rotation crops”
Claim · model-written summary
Annual shelf-free tillage significantly reduced rotation productivity by 8.3–19.5% to 4.51–3.96 t/ha.
- Taxon
- grain cropt0
- Treatment
- annual shelf-free tillage: flat-cutting, shallow disking (10–12 cm), and primarily surface disking (6–8 cm)e0
- Outcome
- this indicatore0
- Direction
- decreasee0
- Value
- 8.3–19.5%e0
- Qualifier
- 4.51–3.96 t/hae0
Not reportedComparator
Verbatim
e0“annual shelf-free tillage: flat-cutting, shallow disking (10–12 cm), and primarily surface disking (6–8 cm), caused a significant decrease (by 8.3–19.5%) of this indicator to 4.51–3.96 t/ha of arable land.”
t0“grain crop rotation crops”
The same questions in other papers
tillage · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
33 papers more in this group
See all 37 papers →rotation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
106 papers in the same direction as this paper · 30 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
140 papers more in this group
See all 144 papers →fertilization · yield · Avena sativa (oats)Positive and negative results
142 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
156 papers more in this group
See all 160 papers →rotation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 83 in the opposite direction · 9 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
341 papers more in this group
See all 345 papers →tillage · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 100 in the opposite direction · 26 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
386 papers more in this group
See all 390 papers →fertilization · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
1,020 papers in the same direction as this paper · 155 in the opposite direction · 16 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- negative
1,188 papers more in this group
See all 1,192 papers →tillage · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
1,115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 257 in the opposite direction · 41 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
1,410 papers more in this group
See all 1,414 papers →fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- negative
3,434 papers more in this group
See all 3,438 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.