Paper · 2025 · Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop

Mitesh Raghuwanshi; Bhagwan Suman; Rajendra Bairwa; et al.

7
claims
14
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted to evaluate the impact of various organic and inorganic fertilizer combinations on the growth, yield, and quality of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). The study investigated nine different nutrient management treatments, including control, varying percentages of recommended doses of fertilizers (RDF), vermicompost, and Rhizobium inoculation, both individually and in combination. Results indicated that integrated nutrient management (INM) significantly enhanced plant population, height, branching, pod and seed formation, dry matter accumulation, 100-seed weight, and ultimately grain, straw, and biological yields. Specifically, the treatment combining 75% RDF with 5 t/ha vermicompost and 20g/kg seed Rhizobium inoculation consistently outperformed other treatments, leading to the highest yields and improved seed nutrient content (NPK). Economic analysis further revealed that INM practices significantly increased gross returns and net profits, demonstrating their economic viability and sustainability. This research underscores the critical role of balanced nutrient application through INM for maximizing chickpea productivity and ensuring long-term agricultural sustainability.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management enhanced plant population, height, branching in chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
integrated nutrient management (INM)e0
Outcome
plant population, height, branchinge0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results indicated that integrated nutrient management (INM) significantly enhanced plant population, height, branching, pod and seed formation, dry matter accumulation, 100-seed weight, and ultimately grain, straw, and biological yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management enhanced pod and seed formation, dry matter accumulation in chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
integrated nutrient management (INM)e0
Outcome
pod and seed formation, dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results indicated that integrated nutrient management (INM) significantly enhanced plant population, height, branching, pod and seed formation, dry matter accumulation, 100-seed weight, and ultimately grain, straw, and biological yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management enhanced 100-seed weight in chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
integrated nutrient management (INM)e0
Outcome
100-seed weighte0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results indicated that integrated nutrient management (INM) significantly enhanced plant population, height, branching, pod and seed formation, dry matter accumulation, 100-seed weight, and ultimately grain, straw, and biological yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Integrated nutrient management enhanced grain, straw, and biological yields in chickpea.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
integrated nutrient management (INM)e0
Outcome
grain, straw, and biological yieldse0
Direction
enhancede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e0

“Results indicated that integrated nutrient management (INM) significantly enhanced plant population, height, branching, pod and seed formation, dry matter accumulation, 100-seed weight, and ultimately grain, straw, and biological yields.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–649 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined RDF, vermicompost and Rhizobium treatment produced the highest yields.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
75% RDF with 5 t/ha vermicompost and 20g/kg seed Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treatment combining 75% RDF with 5 t/ha vermicompost and 20g/kg seed Rhizobium inoculation consistently outperformed other treatments, leading to the highest yields and improved seed nutrient content (NPK).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined treatment improved seed nutrient content.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
75% RDF with 5 t/ha vermicompost and 20g/kg seed Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
seed nutrient content (NPK)e1
Direction
improvede1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e1

“the treatment combining 75% RDF with 5 t/ha vermicompost and 20g/kg seed Rhizobium inoculation consistently outperformed other treatments, leading to the highest yields and improved seed nutrient content (NPK).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–874 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

INM increased gross returns and net profits.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
INM practicese2
Outcome
gross returns and net profitse2
Direction
increasede2

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–107 · show in text ↑
e2

“INM practices significantly increased gross returns and net profits”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 915–982 · show in text ↑

Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

120 papers: 116 positive, 4 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

Rhizobium · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

26 papers: 25 positive, 1 negative or no effect

24 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

22 papers more in this group

See all 26 papers →

fertilization · pest · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

13 papers: 11 positive, 2 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

9 papers more in this group

See all 13 papers →

inoculation · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

63 papers: 57 positive, 6 negative or no effect

56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

59 papers more in this group

See all 63 papers →

fertilization · nutrient: content · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

81 papers: 80 positive, 1 negative or no effect

79 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. positive
  3. positive

77 papers more in this group

See all 81 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this paper · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

213 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this paper · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

341 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.