Intervention effectmodel-written summary

The combined RDF, vermicompost and Rhizobium treatment produced the highest yields.

A claim from Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop · 2025

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The combined RDF, vermicompost and Rhizobium treatment produced the highest yields.

Taxon
ChickpeaCicer arietinumt0
Treatment
75% RDF with 5 t/ha vermicompost and 20g/kg seed Rhizobium inoculatione1
Interactor
RhizobiumRhizobiume1symbiont
Outcome
yieldse1
Direction
higheste1
Comparator
other treatmentse1

Not reportedMaterialGeneCompoundOrgan / stageSecond interactorSecond interactor roleSettingValueQualifier

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cicer arietinum
Cicer arietinum · TaxonSanjay Acharya · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗
Rhizobium
Rhizobium · Interactor · picture of the genus (one of its species)Ninjatacoshell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

t0

“Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 73–107
e1

“the treatment combining 75% RDF with 5 t/ha vermicompost and 20g/kg seed Rhizobium inoculation consistently outperformed other treatments, leading to the highest yields and improved seed nutrient content (NPK).”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–874

Title

Effect of Integrated Nutrient Management on Growth, Yield and Quality of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) Crop

Mitesh Raghuwanshi; Bhagwan Suman; Rajendra Bairwa; et al. Asian Journal of Advances in Agricultural Research 2025. doi:10.9734/ajaar/2025/v25i7654

Other claims from this paper (6)

Record rev-5bbb3dbd278d2fd221774f5b4af9bf1b79d4e12915efd100c373af4b1290447a · schema claims-v0.9 · position 5 in the model’s answer

Rhizobium · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Results differ

120 papers: 116 positive, 4 negative or no effect

115 papers in the same direction as this claim · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
    In a chickpea pot experiment, combining Rhizobium inoculation with seed priming had little effect on yield.

    The improvement of crop yield in marginal environments using ‘on-farm’ seed priming: nodulation, nitrogen fixation, and disease resistance · 2005

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation had no effect on chickpea yield.

    Growth and yield of two chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) varieties in Canterbury, New Zealand · 1995

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation did not significantly change crop biomass, grain yield or harvest index of chickpea compared with the non-inoculated control.

    Growth and yield response of chickpea to Rhizobium inoculation: productivity in relation to interception of radiation · 2015 · compared with non-inoculated control

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    Rhizobium and 10 ppm GA3 treatments gave an almost negative response in yield parameters, with a few exceptions.

    Growth, yield and biochemical responses of BARI chhola-9 (Cicer arietinum L.) to GA3 and rhizobium application · 2018

    Opposite direction

  5. positive
    Single, dual, and triple bacterial inoculations significantly increased pod number versus control in controlled and field trials.

    Influence of Nitrogen Fixing and Phosphorus Solubilizing Bacteria on the Nodulation, Plant Growth, and Yield of Chickpea · 2007 · compared with control treatment

    Same direction

  6. positive
    Combined Rhizobium and GA3 at 10−5 M enhanced chickpea grain yield by up to 39%.

    The Combined Effects of Gibberellic Acid and Rhizobium on Growth, Yield and Nutritional Status in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2021

    Same direction

  7. positive
    Rhizobium + PSB inoculation enhanced yield attributes, grain and straw yields in chickpea

    Effect ofRhizobiumand Phosphate Solubilizing Bacterial Inoculants on Symbiotic Traits, Nodule Leghemoglobin, and Yield of Chickpea Genotypes · 2013

    Same direction

  8. positive
    Inoculation increased pod number by 28% over control.

    Effect of chickpea in association with Rhizobium to crop productivity and soil fertility · 2016 · compared with control plant

    Same direction

111 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

inoculation · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

217 papers: 200 positive, 17 negative or no effect

199 papers in the same direction as this claim · 14 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    In a chickpea pot experiment, combining Rhizobium inoculation with seed priming had little effect on yield.

    The improvement of crop yield in marginal environments using ‘on-farm’ seed priming: nodulation, nitrogen fixation, and disease resistance · 2005

    Opposite direction

  2. negative
    Increasing R. solani inoculum reduced emergence and dry matter production.

    Etiology, impact and control of rhizoctonia seedling blight and root rot of chickpea on the Canadian prairies · 2003

    Opposite direction

  3. negative
    Chickpea Avrodhi grown in plots inoculated with F. oxysporum f. sp. ciceri and R. solani had a 22%-25% decrease in yield.

    Field performance of Trichoderma species against wilt disease complex of chickpea caused by Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. ciceri and Rhizoctonia solani · 2014

    Opposite direction

  4. negative
    S. rolfsii inoculation alone gave the lowest chickpea grain yield.

    Effect of soil amendment with Chenopodium album dry biomass and two Trichoderma species on growth of chickpea var. Noor 2009 in Sclerotium rolfsii contaminated soil · 2020 · compared with without any soil amendment

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Rhizobium inoculation had no effect on chickpea yield.

    Growth and yield of two chickpea ( Cicer arietinum L.) varieties in Canterbury, New Zealand · 1995

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    M. incognita inoculation decreased chickpea yield by 24%.

    Laboratory and field performance of some soil bacteria used as seed treatments on Meloidogyne incognita in chickpea · 2012

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    Field growth, shoot P concentration and seed yield were unaffected by VAMF inoculation.

    Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhiza and Phosphorus Uptake of Chickpea Grown in Northern Syria · 1992

    Opposite direction

  8. negative
    S. rolfsii reduced grain dry weight by 49%.

    ALLEVIATING STRESS OF SCLERTIUM ROLFSII ON GROWTH OF CHICKPEA VAR. BHAKKAR-2011 BY TRICHODERMA HARZIANUM AND T. VIRIDE · 2021 · compared with negative control

    Opposite direction

208 papers more in this group

See all 217 papers →

fertilization · yield · Cicer arietinum (chickpea)Positive and negative results

345 papers: 326 positive, 19 negative or no effect

325 papers in the same direction as this claim · 15 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
    Chickpea grain yield was unaffected by fertilizer nitrogen supply and ranged from 2.0–2.4 t/ha.

    Nitrogen fixation and soil nitrate interactions in field-grown chickpea ( Cicer arietinum ) and fababean ( Vicia faba ) · 2002

    Opposite direction

  2. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilization had no significant effect on nutrient uptake and biomass production.

    Arbuscular mycorrhiza enhances nutrient uptake in chickpea · 2011

    Opposite direction

  3. no effect
    Field growth, shoot P concentration and seed yield were unaffected by P fertilization.

    Vesicular-Arbuscular Mycorrhiza and Phosphorus Uptake of Chickpea Grown in Northern Syria · 1992

    Opposite direction

  4. no effect
    Nitrogen fertilizer did not increase seed yield in either legume.

    Effect of irrigation on growth and yield of Kabuli chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) and narrow-leafed lupin (Lupinus angustifolius L.). · 2008

    Opposite direction

  5. no effect
    Phosphorus fertilization did not affect chickpea yield components.

    Effect of Different Soil Tillage, Weed Control and Phosphorus Fertilization on Weed Biomas, Protein and Phosphorus Content of Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) · 2006

    Opposite direction

  6. negative
    A 25% fertilizer reduction lowered chickpea seed yield by 6.6% in 2005-06.

    Effect of row ratio and fertility levels on chickpea (Cicer arietinum) and linseed (Linum usitatissimum) intercropping system · 2001 · compared with RDF

    Opposite direction

  7. no effect
    In area 02, nitrogen fertilization did not interfere with the remaining production variables of chickpea.

    Inoculation of Bacillus spp. and nitrogen levels increase chickpea production · 2021

    Opposite direction

  8. no effect
    Fertilizer levels did not significantly affect chickpea yield attributes, grain and straw yields, or harvest index.

    Intercropping efficiency of chickpea (Cicer arietinum) based intercropping system under rainfed condition of Bihar · 2015

    Opposite direction

336 papers more in this group

See all 345 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.