Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Effect of soil fertility management practices on dry matter accumulation of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the Varanasi region of Uttar Pradesh

Bhanupriya Pankaj; RS Meena

5
claims
11
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted over two consecutive years (2019-20 & 2020-21) at the Agricultural Research Farm of the Institute of Agricultural Sciences (I.A.S), Banaras Hindu University (B.H.U). The experiment was laid out in a split-plot design and replicated thrice. Results revealed that the treatment of 100% RDF + 5 kg Zn + 5 kg Fe recorded the highest dry matter accumulation (g) compared to the control and the application of 75% RDF at 30 (6.22, 7.29, and 6.75 g). and 60 DAS (98.21, 104.27, and 101.24 g) of wheat during both years and pooled analysis, respectively. However, at 90 DAS (407.17, 412.54, and 409.86 g) it was found significantly superior over the rest of the treatments in both years and pooled analysis, respectively. While application of various organic inputs and AMF did not produce any significant effect on dry matter accumulation (g) at 30 and 60 DAS of wheat during both years and in the pooled analysis, respectively. However, at 90 DAS, there was a significant effect on dry matter accumulation. The treatment of sludge + rice husk biochar + bagasse converted biochar + AMF (350.68, 362.71, and 356.70 g) recorded the highest dry matter accumulation at all growth stages of observation followed by the treatment sludge + rice husk biochar + AMF (344.02, 356.84, and 350.43 g) than that of other treatments in both years and pooled analysis, respectively.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 5

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF, zinc and iron treatment gave the highest wheat dry matter accumulation at 30 and 60 DAS relative to the control and 75% RDF.

Organ / stage
30e0
Treatment
100% RDF + 5 kg Zn + 5 kg Fee0
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
6.22, 7.29, and 6.75 ge0
Comparator
the control and the application of 75% RDFe0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“100% RDF + 5 kg Zn + 5 kg Fe recorded the highest dry matter accumulation (g) compared to the control and the application of 75% RDF at 30 (6.22, 7.29, and 6.75 g). and 60 DAS (98.21, 104.27, and 101.24 g)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 312–517 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultno effectnot significant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic inputs and AMF had no significant effect on wheat dry matter accumulation at 30 and 60 DAS.

Organ / stage
30 and 60 DASe0
Treatment
various organic inputs and AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
did not produce any significant effecte0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“application of various organic inputs and AMF did not produce any significant effect on dry matter accumulation (g) at 30 and 60 DAS of wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–894 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Organic inputs and AMF significantly affected wheat dry matter accumulation at 90 DAS.

Organ / stage
90 DASe0
Treatment
various organic inputs and AMFe1
Interactor
AMFe1symbiont
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0

Not reportedComparatorDirection

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“at 90 DAS, there was a significant effect on dry matter accumulation.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 964–1033 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of various organic inputs and AMF”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 753–798 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge, two biochars and AMF gave the highest dry matter accumulation among organic treatments.

Treatment
sludge + rice husk biochar + bagasse converted biochar + AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione0
Direction
higheste0
Value
350.68, 362.71, and 356.70 ge0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“sludge + rice husk biochar + bagasse converted biochar + AMF (350.68, 362.71, and 356.70 g) recorded the highest dry matter accumulation at all growth stages of observation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1051–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Sludge, rice husk biochar and AMF ranked next for dry matter accumulation.

Treatment
sludge + rice husk biochar + AMFe0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
dry matter accumulatione1
Direction
followed bye0
Value
344.02, 356.84, and 350.43 ge0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“followed by the treatment sludge + rice husk biochar + AMF (344.02, 356.84, and 350.43 g) than that of other treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1224–1343 · show in text ↑
e1

“highest dry matter accumulation at all growth stages of observation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1156–1223 · show in text ↑
t0

“wheat”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 76–81 · show in text ↑

iron atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

99 papers: 92 positive, 7 negative or no effect

91 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

zinc atom · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

511 papers: 456 positive, 55 negative or no effect

455 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. no effect

507 papers more in this group

See all 511 papers →

Oryza sativa · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

154 papers: 128 positive, 26 negative or no effect

127 papers in the same direction as this paper · 23 in the opposite direction · 3 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

150 papers more in this group

See all 154 papers →

mycorrhiza · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

103 papers: 95 positive, 8 negative or no effect

94 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

99 papers more in this group

See all 103 papers →

biochar · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

121 papers: 111 positive, 10 negative or no effect

110 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

117 papers more in this group

See all 121 papers →

organic · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

322 papers: 281 positive, 41 negative or no effect

280 papers in the same direction as this paper · 35 in the opposite direction · 6 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

318 papers more in this group

See all 322 papers →

fertilization · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

3,438 papers: 3,115 positive, 323 negative or no effect

3,114 papers in the same direction as this paper · 284 in the opposite direction · 39 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. positive
  2. no effect
  3. negative

3,434 papers more in this group

See all 3,438 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.