Paper · 2025 · International Journal of Research in Agronomy

Growth and yield of fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.) as influenced by nutrient management practices

Yewale RD; BN Aglave; VP Suryavanshi; et al.

7
claims
15
verbatim quotes
0
citations
1
research areas
✓
Open access

Abstract

A field experiment was conducted during Kharif 2024 at the Experimental Farm of Agronomy Section, College of Agriculture, Latur to study the effect of nutrient management practices on the growth and yield of fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.). The soil was clayey in texture, moderately alkaline, low in available phosphorus, moderate in nitrogen and high in potassium. The experiment was laid out in a Randomized Block Design with eight treatments and replicated thrice. The treatments are T1- control, T2- 100% RDF, T3- 100% RDF with Micronutrient Gr-II @ 0.5% spray, T4-100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2%, T5- 100% RDF with 2% DAP spray, T6- 75% RDF with micronutrient grade II 0.5% spray, T7- 75% RDF with 2% urea spray and T8 - 75% RDF with 2% DAP spray. Full dose of P & K and half dose of N as basal & remaining half dose of N as top dressing at 30 DAS were applied. The results showed that application of 100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2% (T3) recorded significantly higher growth attributes i.e., plant height (243.27 cm) plant-1, number of functional leaves plant-1 (14.10), leaf area plant-1 (71.00 dm2), stem girth plant-1 (8.37 cm), fresh weight per plant (1.187 kg) and yield attributes i.e., maximum green fodder yield (462 q ha-1), leaf: stem ratio (0.39) which was at par with 100% RDF with Micronutrient Gr-II @ 0.5% spray (T3).

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record, shown for indexing and research. Copyright remains with the authors or the publisher. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The 100% RDF with 2% urea spray treatment gave significantly higher plant height of 243.27 cm per plant.

Taxon
fodder sorghume0
Treatment
100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2%e1
Outcome
plant heighte1
Direction
highere1
Value
243.27 cme1
Comparator
100% RDF with Micronutrient Gr-II @ 0.5% spraye2

Verbatim

e0

“fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2% (T3) recorded significantly higher growth attributes i.e., plant height (243.27 cm) plant-1”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1030 · show in text ↑
e2

“at par with 100% RDF with Micronutrient Gr-II @ 0.5% spray (T3)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1274–1337 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The urea treatment gave 14.10 functional leaves per plant, among significantly higher growth attributes.

Taxon
fodder sorghume0
Treatment
100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2%e1
Outcome
number of functional leaves plant-1e1
Direction
highere1
Value
14.10e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2% (T3) recorded significantly higher growth attributes i.e., plant height (243.27 cm) plant-1, number of functional leaves plant-1 (14.10)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1075 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The urea treatment gave leaf area of 71.00 dm2 per plant, among significantly higher growth attributes.

Taxon
fodder sorghume0
Treatment
100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2%e1
Outcome
leaf area plant-1e1
Direction
highere1
Value
71.00 dm2e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2% (T3) recorded significantly higher growth attributes i.e., plant height (243.27 cm) plant-1, number of functional leaves plant-1 (14.10), leaf area plant-1 (71.00 dm2)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1106 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The urea treatment gave stem girth of 8.37 cm per plant, among significantly higher growth attributes.

Taxon
fodder sorghume0
Treatment
100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2%e1
Outcome
stem girth plant-1e1
Direction
highere1
Value
8.37 cme1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2% (T3) recorded significantly higher growth attributes i.e., plant height (243.27 cm) plant-1, number of functional leaves plant-1 (14.10), leaf area plant-1 (71.00 dm2), stem girth plant-1 (8.37 cm)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1136 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The urea treatment gave fresh weight of 1.187 kg per plant, among significantly higher growth attributes.

Taxon
fodder sorghume0
Treatment
100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2%e1
Outcome
fresh weight per plante1
Direction
highere1
Value
1.187 kge1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2% (T3) recorded significantly higher growth attributes i.e., plant height (243.27 cm) plant-1, number of functional leaves plant-1 (14.10), leaf area plant-1 (71.00 dm2), stem girth plant-1 (8.37 cm), fresh weight per plant (1.187 kg)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1171 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The urea treatment gave maximum green fodder yield of 462 q ha-1.

Taxon
fodder sorghume0
Treatment
100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2%e1
Outcome
green fodder yielde1
Direction
maximume1
Value
462 q ha-1e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2% (T3) recorded significantly higher growth attributes i.e., plant height (243.27 cm) plant-1, number of functional leaves plant-1 (14.10), leaf area plant-1 (71.00 dm2), stem girth plant-1 (8.37 cm), fresh weight per plant (1.187 kg) and yield attributes i.e., maximum green fodder yield (462 q ha-1)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1238 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

The urea treatment gave a leaf-to-stem ratio of 0.39.

Taxon
fodder sorghume0
Treatment
100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2%e1
Outcome
leaf: stem ratioe1
Direction
highere1
Value
0.39e1

Not reportedComparator

Verbatim

e0

“fodder sorghum (Sorghum bicolor L.)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 208–243 · show in text ↑
e1

“application of 100% RDF with Urea spray @ 2% (T3) recorded significantly higher growth attributes i.e., plant height (243.27 cm) plant-1, number of functional leaves plant-1 (14.10), leaf area plant-1 (71.00 dm2), stem girth plant-1 (8.37 cm), fresh weight per plant (1.187 kg) and yield attributes i.e., maximum green fodder yield (462 q ha-1), leaf: stem ratio (0.39)”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 894–1263 · show in text ↑

nitrogen · growth · SorghumResults differ

93 papers: 81 positive, 12 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 10 in the opposite direction · 2 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

89 papers more in this group

See all 93 papers →

fertilization · growth · SorghumResults differ

120 papers: 104 positive, 16 negative or no effect

103 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. no effect

116 papers more in this group

See all 120 papers →

application · growth · SorghumPositive and negative results

43 papers: 36 positive, 7 negative or no effect

35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 7 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

39 papers more in this group

See all 43 papers →

application · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

88 papers: 81 positive, 7 negative or no effect

80 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

84 papers more in this group

See all 88 papers →

nitrogen · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

290 papers: 264 positive, 26 negative or no effect

263 papers in the same direction as this paper · 22 in the opposite direction · 4 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. negative

286 papers more in this group

See all 290 papers →

fertilization · yield · SorghumPositive and negative results

446 papers: 418 positive, 28 negative or no effect

417 papers in the same direction as this paper · 21 in the opposite direction · 7 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

442 papers more in this group

See all 446 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.