Paper · 2025 · Journal of Plant Production

Impact of Irrigation Regimes and Growth Stimulants on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield and Grain Quality Under Water Stress

Alaa M. E.A. Shahein; Hayam I. A. Elsawy; K. A. El-Feky; et al.

14
claims
27
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Throughout the two following winter growing seasons of 2023–2024 and 2024–2025, a field experiment was conducted in the field at the Sakha research station, Wheat Research farm, Field Crops Research Institute, Kafr El-Sheikh, Agricultural Research Center, Egypt. The purpose of this study was to examine the effects of growth stimulants (control, Ascobein, Seaweed, and Molasses) and irrigation level (water amount equivalent to 115, 105, and 95% of field capacity (F.C.) in root zone 0-60 cm depth) on the growth, yield, and grain quality of the wheat cultivar (Giza 171).The findings demonstrated a substantial decrease in the majority of growth characteristics, yield and its attributes, and water consumptive use (WCU) when the irrigation water level was lowered from 115% to 95%. Proline, peroxidase activity, catalase activity, dry gluten, protein content, water productivity applied (PWA), and water usage efficiency (WUE) all showed notable increases during season 2024/2025.Grain yield, biological yield, number of spikes per spike, 1000-kernel weight, number of spikes m-2, and WCU all significantly increased when molasses was added to the soil at 115% F.C. In the meantime, proline content, catalase activity, peroxidase activity protein content, dry gluten, PWA and WUE, all increased with molasses 95% irrigation. In the first winter season, the highest dry gluten was associated with treatments of ascobein and Molasses (12.4 and 12.3%), respectively.Taken together, when there was a water scarcity, the application of molasses performed better than seaweed and ascobein in terms of enhancing wheat output, growth characteristics, and grain quality.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 14

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lowering irrigation from 115% to 95% reduced growth characteristics, yield and attributes.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation water level was lowered from 115% to 95%e0
Outcome
growth characteristics, yield and its attributese0
Direction
substantial decreasee0
Comparator
115%e0

Not reportedMaterial

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“substantial decrease in the majority of growth characteristics, yield and its attributes, and water consumptive use (WCU) when the irrigation water level was lowered from 115% to 95%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Irrigation Regimes and Growth Stimulants on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield and Grain Quality Under Water Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultmeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Lower irrigation reduced water consumptive use.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
irrigation water level was lowered from 115% to 95%e0
Outcome
water consumptive use (WCU)e0
Direction
substantial decreasee0
Comparator
115%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“substantial decrease in the majority of growth characteristics, yield and its attributes, and water consumptive use (WCU) when the irrigation water level was lowered from 115% to 95%”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 601–783 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Irrigation Regimes and Growth Stimulants on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield and Grain Quality Under Water Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Proline and antioxidant enzyme activities rose during 2024/2025.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Outcome
Proline, peroxidase activity, catalase activitye0
Direction
notable increasese0
Qualifier
during season 2024/2025e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline, peroxidase activity, catalase activity, dry gluten, protein content, water productivity applied (PWA), and water usage efficiency (WUE) all showed notable increases during season 2024/2025”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Irrigation Regimes and Growth Stimulants on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield and Grain Quality Under Water Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Dry gluten and protein content rose during 2024/2025.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Outcome
dry gluten, protein contente0
Direction
notable increasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Proline, peroxidase activity, catalase activity, dry gluten, protein content, water productivity applied (PWA), and water usage efficiency (WUE) all showed notable increases during season 2024/2025”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 785–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Irrigation Regimes and Growth Stimulants on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield and Grain Quality Under Water Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Water productivity and use efficiency rose during 2024/2025.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Outcome
water productivity applied (PWA), and water usage efficiency (WUE)e0
Direction
notable increasese0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“water productivity applied (PWA), and water usage efficiency (WUE) all showed notable increases during season 2024/2025”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 863–982 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Irrigation Regimes and Growth Stimulants on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield and Grain Quality Under Water Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Molasses at 115% field capacity increased grain and biological yields and yield attributes.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
molasses was added to the soil at 115% F.C.e0
Outcome
Grain yield, biological yield, number of spikes per spikee0
Direction
significantly increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield, biological yield, number of spikes per spike, 1000-kernel weight, number of spikes m-2, and WCU all significantly increased when molasses was added to the soil at 115% F.C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Irrigation Regimes and Growth Stimulants on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield and Grain Quality Under Water Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Molasses at 115% field capacity increased kernel weight and spike density.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
molasses was added to the soil at 115% F.C.e0
Outcome
1000-kernel weight, number of spikes m-2e0
Direction
significantly increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“Grain yield, biological yield, number of spikes per spike, 1000-kernel weight, number of spikes m-2, and WCU all significantly increased when molasses was added to the soil at 115% F.C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Irrigation Regimes and Growth Stimulants on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield and Grain Quality Under Water Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultsignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

Molasses at 115% field capacity increased WCU.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
molasses was added to the soil at 115% F.C.e0
Outcome
WCUe0
Direction
significantly increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“WCU all significantly increased when molasses was added to the soil at 115% F.C.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1088–1168 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Irrigation Regimes and Growth Stimulants on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield and Grain Quality Under Water Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Molasses with 95% irrigation increased proline and enzyme activities.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
molasses 95% irrigatione0
Outcome
proline content, catalase activity, peroxidase activitye0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proline content, catalase activity, peroxidase activity protein content, dry gluten, PWA and WUE, all increased with molasses 95% irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Irrigation Regimes and Growth Stimulants on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield and Grain Quality Under Water Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Molasses with 95% irrigation increased protein and dry gluten.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
molasses 95% irrigatione0
Outcome
protein content, dry glutene0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“proline content, catalase activity, peroxidase activity protein content, dry gluten, PWA and WUE, all increased with molasses 95% irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1186–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Irrigation Regimes and Growth Stimulants on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield and Grain Quality Under Water Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Molasses with 95% irrigation increased PWA and WUE.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
molasses 95% irrigatione0
Outcome
PWA and WUEe0
Direction
increasede0

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“PWA and WUE, all increased with molasses 95% irrigation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1271–1326 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Irrigation Regimes and Growth Stimulants on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield and Grain Quality Under Water Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Ascobein gave the highest first-season dry gluten at 12.4%.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
ascobeine0
Outcome
dry glutene0
Direction
higheste0
Value
12.4e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest dry gluten was associated with treatments of ascobein and Molasses (12.4 and 12.3%), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1465 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Irrigation Regimes and Growth Stimulants on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield and Grain Quality Under Water Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Molasses gave first-season dry gluten of 12.3%.

Taxon
Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)Triticum aestivumt0
Treatment
Molassese0
Outcome
dry glutene0
Value
12.3%e0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“highest dry gluten was associated with treatments of ascobein and Molasses (12.4 and 12.3%), respectively”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1465 · show in text ↑
t0

“Impact of Irrigation Regimes and Growth Stimulants on Wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) Yield and Grain Quality Under Water Stress”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–125 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

Under water scarcity, molasses performed better than seaweed and ascobein for output, growth and grain quality.

Treatment
application of molassese0
Outcome
wheat output, growth characteristics, and grain qualitye0
Direction
performed bettere0
Comparator
seaweed and ascobeine0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Triticum aestivum
Triticum aestivum · TaxonRasbak · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“when there was a water scarcity, the application of molasses performed better than seaweed and ascobein in terms of enhancing wheat output, growth characteristics, and grain quality”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1482–1663 · show in text ↑

molasses · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

molasses · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

irrigation · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Results differ

80 papers: 50 positive, 30 negative or no effect

49 papers in the same direction as this paper · 29 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

irrigation · physiology: antioxidant enzymes · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

10 papers: 8 positive, 2 negative or no effect

7 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

6 papers more in this group

See all 10 papers →

irrigation · physiology: water · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

303 papers: 253 positive, 50 negative or no effect

252 papers in the same direction as this paper · 49 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. negative

299 papers more in this group

See all 303 papers →

irrigation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results

989 papers: 798 positive, 191 negative or no effect

190 papers in the same direction as this paper · 798 in the opposite direction

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

985 papers more in this group

See all 989 papers →

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.