Paper · 2025 · Notulae Botanicae Horti Agrobotanici Cluj-Napoca

Role of vermicompost and biostimulants in enhancing garlic growth, bulb yield, and quality parameters

Hassan A. HASSAN; Mohamed M. SHAHEIN; Mohamed M. EL-MOGY; et al.

6
claims
16
verbatim quotes
0
citations
2
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

Organic fertilizers and biostimulants have been widely studied in vegetable crops, but evidence on their individual and combined effects on growth and quality remains limited. Therefore, this study assessed the effectiveness and synergistic potential of selected organic amendments and biostimulants in improving garlic growth, nutrient composition, allicin content, and total yield. Across two growing seasons, garlic plants received the followed treatment: 1) seaweed extract (SW), 2) garlic extract (GE), 3) yeast extract (YE), 4) vermicompost (VC), biochar, and their combinations. Growth traits, nutrient concentrations, allicin content, bulb characteristics, and yield components were measured and compared with an untreated control. All treatments significantly enhanced plant height, leaf number, and leaf area. The co-application of GE + SW along with vermicompost and biochare produced the highest growth performance and nutrient accumulation. Furthermore, this treatment also markedly increased allicin content, improving bulb quality, and resulted in the greatest bulb weight and total yield. Overall, combining organic fertilizers with biostimulants provides a sustainable strategy to enhance garlic productivity and quality while reducing dependence on synthetic inputs. The study recommends the integrated use of GE + SW with vermicompost and biochar as an effective nutrient management approach.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 6

Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivesignificant (as stated)measured

Claim · model-written summary

All organic and biostimulant treatments significantly enhanced garlic plant height, leaf number and leaf area compared with an untreated control.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
All treatmentse1
Outcome
plant height, leaf number, and leaf areae1
Direction
significantly enhancede1
Comparator
untreated controle2

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e1

“All treatments significantly enhanced plant height, leaf number, and leaf area”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 740–818 · show in text ↑
e2

“were measured and compared with an untreated control”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 686–738 · show in text ↑
t0

“enhancing garlic growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The co-application of GE + SW with vermicompost and biochar gave the highest growth performance and nutrient accumulation in garlic.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
co-application of GE + SW along with vermicompost and biocharee3
Outcome
growth performance and nutrient accumulatione3
Direction
higheste3

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The co-application of GE + SW along with vermicompost and biochare produced the highest growth performance and nutrient accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–952 · show in text ↑
t0

“enhancing garlic growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The co-application of GE + SW with vermicompost and biochar markedly increased garlic allicin content.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
co-application of GE + SW along with vermicompost and biocharee3
Outcome
allicin contente4
Direction
markedly increasede4

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The co-application of GE + SW along with vermicompost and biochare produced the highest growth performance and nutrient accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–952 · show in text ↑
e4

“this treatment also markedly increased allicin content”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 967–1021 · show in text ↑
t0

“enhancing garlic growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The co-application of GE + SW with vermicompost and biochar gave the greatest garlic bulb weight and total yield.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
co-application of GE + SW along with vermicompost and biocharee3
Outcome
bulb weight and total yielde5
Direction
greateste5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The co-application of GE + SW along with vermicompost and biochare produced the highest growth performance and nutrient accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–952 · show in text ↑
e5

“improving bulb quality, and resulted in the greatest bulb weight and total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“enhancing garlic growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–65 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

The co-application of GE + SW with vermicompost and biochar improved garlic bulb quality.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Treatment
co-application of GE + SW along with vermicompost and biocharee3
Outcome
bulb qualitye5
Direction
improvinge5

Not reportedComparator

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e3

“The co-application of GE + SW along with vermicompost and biochare produced the highest growth performance and nutrient accumulation”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 820–952 · show in text ↑
e5

“improving bulb quality, and resulted in the greatest bulb weight and total yield”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1103 · show in text ↑
t0

“enhancing garlic growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–65 · show in text ↑
Recommendationauthor interpretationoriginal resultpositivebasis n/a

Claim · model-written summary

The authors recommend integrated GE + SW with vermicompost and biochar as an effective nutrient management approach for garlic.

Taxon
garlicAllium sativumt0
Outcome
effective nutrient management approache6

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Allium sativum
Allium sativum · TaxonIvar Leidus · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e6

“The study recommends the integrated use of GE + SW with vermicompost and biochar as an effective nutrient management approach”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1285–1410 · show in text ↑
t0

“enhancing garlic growth”

✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–65 · show in text ↑

fertilization · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Results differ

166 papers: 155 positive, 11 negative or no effect

154 papers in the same direction as this paper · 11 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

162 papers more in this group

See all 166 papers →

fertilization · quality: general · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

12 papers: 11 positive, 1 negative or no effect

10 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
  3. positive

8 papers more in this group

See all 12 papers →

fertilization · molecular: metabolites · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

20 papers: 16 positive, 4 negative or no effect

15 papers in the same direction as this paper · 4 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

16 papers more in this group

See all 20 papers →

botanical · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

botanical · yield · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

25 papers: 23 positive, 2 negative or no effect

22 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

21 papers more in this group

See all 25 papers →

fertilization · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Positive and negative results

99 papers: 93 positive, 6 negative or no effect

92 papers in the same direction as this paper · 6 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. no effect

95 papers more in this group

See all 99 papers →

botanical · quality: general · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

biochar · growth · Allium sativum (garlic)Results agree

3 papers: 3 positive, 0 negative or no effect

2 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

8 of 15 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.