Abstract
The aim of the study is to investigate the role of spring wheat and rapeseed straw using the biodestructor Mikotop in increasing the efficiency of mineral fertilizers in the cultivation of soybeans and spring wheat. The study was conducted under production conditions on the chernozem of the Biysk-Chumysh zone of the Altai Region of the Ivanov A.N. Peasant Farm. Two field experiments were laid out: the first – with the introduction of spring wheat straw, on which soybeans were grown, the background in this area was mineral fertilizers at a dose of N78P26K26, and the experiment options included the introduction of straw (0.85 and 1.9 t/ha), both separately and inoculated with the biopreparation Mikotop at a dose of 1 l/ha; The second was conducted with spring rapeseed straw, over which spring wheat was grown. The experimental design also included the N75P26K26, background. The experimental variants were similar, with straw doses of 1.8 and 2.5 t/ha, respectively. Yield, grain quality, and economic indicators were assessed. For this, plant samples were collected in five replicates using the sheaf method. Grain weight, protein, and gluten content were determined according to GOST standards, as well as farm-specific costs. When adding spring wheat straw alone, the soybean yield increased by 2.5–4.1 % with an increase in protein from 35.1 to 37.2–39.3 %. For the inoculated variants, it increased more significantly – by 7.5–12.3 % with a protein content of 36.5–39.6 %. In the experiment with rapeseed straw, the wheat yield increased in the inoculated variants by 6.7–7.8 % against 2.5–4.5 % with straw alone, protein by 2.4–2.7 %, and by 0.6 % with pure straw. The profitability level in the experiment with soybeans increased from 66.8 to 69.8–87.5 %, and with spring wheat – from 28.8 to 31.4–36.8 %. The results demonstrate the important role of the Mykotop decomposer in increasing crop yields and improving their quality, due to the absorption of nutrients from applied fertilizers.
Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗
The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.
Claims 10
Claim · model-written summary
Spring wheat straw alone increased soybean yield by 2.5–4.1 %.
- Taxon
- soybean
Glycine maxe0 - Treatment
- spring wheat straw alonee0
- Outcome
- soybean yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2.5–4.1 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When adding spring wheat straw alone, the soybean yield increased by 2.5–4.1 % with an increase in protein from 35.1 to 37.2–39.3 %.”
Claim · model-written summary
Spring wheat straw alone increased soybean protein from 35.1 to 37.2–39.3 %.
- Taxon
- soybeanGlycine maxe0
- Treatment
- spring wheat straw alonee0
- Outcome
- proteine0
- Direction
- increasee0
- Value
- 37.2–39.3 %e0
- Qualifier
- 35.1e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“When adding spring wheat straw alone, the soybean yield increased by 2.5–4.1 % with an increase in protein from 35.1 to 37.2–39.3 %.”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated straw variants increased soybean yield by 7.5–12.3 %.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- inoculated variantse0
- Outcome
- soybean yielde1
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 7.5–12.3 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For the inoculated variants, it increased more significantly – by 7.5–12.3 % with a protein content of 36.5–39.6 %.”
e1“When adding spring wheat straw alone, the soybean yield increased by 2.5–4.1 % with an increase in protein from 35.1 to 37.2–39.3 %.”
t0“cultivation of soybeans and spring wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean protein content under inoculated straw variants was 36.5–39.6 %.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxt0
- Treatment
- inoculated variantse0
- Outcome
- protein contente0
- Value
- 36.5–39.6 %e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“For the inoculated variants, it increased more significantly – by 7.5–12.3 % with a protein content of 36.5–39.6 %.”
t0“cultivation of soybeans and spring wheat”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated rapeseed straw increased wheat yield by 6.7–7.8 %.
- Taxon
- wheat
Triticum aestivume0 - Treatment
- inoculated variantse0
- Outcome
- wheat yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 6.7–7.8 %e0
- Comparator
- straw alonee0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the experiment with rapeseed straw, the wheat yield increased in the inoculated variants by 6.7–7.8 % against 2.5–4.5 % with straw alone, protein by 2.4–2.7 %, and by 0.6 % with pure straw.”
Claim · model-written summary
Rapeseed straw alone increased wheat yield by 2.5–4.5 %.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- straw alonee0
- Outcome
- wheat yielde0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2.5–4.5 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the experiment with rapeseed straw, the wheat yield increased in the inoculated variants by 6.7–7.8 % against 2.5–4.5 % with straw alone, protein by 2.4–2.7 %, and by 0.6 % with pure straw.”
Claim · model-written summary
Inoculated rapeseed straw increased wheat protein by 2.4–2.7 %.
- Taxon
- wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Treatment
- inoculated variantse0
- Outcome
- proteine0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 2.4–2.7 %e0
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the experiment with rapeseed straw, the wheat yield increased in the inoculated variants by 6.7–7.8 % against 2.5–4.5 % with straw alone, protein by 2.4–2.7 %, and by 0.6 % with pure straw.”
Claim · model-written summary
Pure rapeseed straw increased wheat protein by 0.6 %.
Not reportedComparator
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“In the experiment with rapeseed straw, the wheat yield increased in the inoculated variants by 6.7–7.8 % against 2.5–4.5 % with straw alone, protein by 2.4–2.7 %, and by 0.6 % with pure straw.”
Claim · model-written summary
Soybean experiment profitability rose from 66.8 to 69.8–87.5 %.
- Taxon
- soybeansGlycine maxe0
- Outcome
- profitability levele0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 69.8–87.5 %e0
- Qualifier
- 66.8e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The profitability level in the experiment with soybeans increased from 66.8 to 69.8–87.5 %, and with spring wheat – from 28.8 to 31.4–36.8 %.”
Claim · model-written summary
Spring wheat experiment profitability rose from 28.8 to 31.4–36.8 %.
- Taxon
- spring wheatTriticum aestivume0
- Outcome
- profitability levele0
- Direction
- increasede0
- Value
- 31.4–36.8 %e0
- Qualifier
- 28.8e0
Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.
Verbatim
e0“The profitability level in the experiment with soybeans increased from 66.8 to 69.8–87.5 %, and with spring wheat – from 28.8 to 31.4–36.8 %.”
The same questions in other papers
Triticum aestivum · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
35 papers in the same direction as this paper · 16 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
53 papers more in this group
See all 57 papers →Triticum aestivum · quality: protein · Glycine max (soybean)Results agree
2 papers in the same direction as this paper
- positive
- positive
inoculation · quality: protein · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
56 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction
- negative
- no effect
- no effect
61 papers more in this group
See all 65 papers →inoculation · yield · Glycine max (soybean)Positive and negative results
490 papers in the same direction as this paper · 63 in the opposite direction · 12 reporting no difference from an alternative
- no effect
- no effect
- no effect
562 papers more in this group
See all 566 papers →inoculation · yield · Triticum aestivum (wheat)Positive and negative results
548 papers in the same direction as this paper · 60 in the opposite direction · 5 reporting no difference from an alternative
- negative
- negative
- negative
610 papers more in this group
See all 614 papers →Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.