Paper · 2026 · Life

Assessing the Potential of the Plant Pellets Produced from Lignocellulosic Biomass for Seedling Growth

Kritsana Jatuwong; Worawoot Aiduang; Orlavanh Xayyavong; et al.

7
claims
7
verbatim quotes
0
citations
3
research areas
✓
Open access · cc-by

Abstract

The development of sustainable and efficient plant growth substrates is crucial for modern agriculture. This study assessed the potential of plant pellets formulated from various lignocellulosic residues, either with or without bamboo biochar (BB-char) and arbuscular mycorrhizal fungi (AMF), to support seed germination and early seedling growth. Four types of residues, including coconut coir (CO), corn cob (CC), leaves from the genus Dipterocarpus (DL), and teak leaves (TL), were combined with soil and paper waste to produce eight pellet formulations, with commercial peat pellets serving as a control. Chemical analyses revealed significant variation among the pellet types, with pH values ranging from 6.40 to 7.65, electrical conductivity (EC) from 3.64 to 11.62 mS cm−1, and differences in organic matter, carbon, and nutrient contents [nitrogen (N), phosphorus (P), potassium (K)], reflecting the influence of residue type and the addition of BB-char and AMF. Phytotoxicity screening using aqueous extracts demonstrated species-specific responses, with cucumber exhibiting high tolerance across treatments, whereas chili seeds were more sensitive. Final germination percentage (FGP) and seedling growth assays in greenhouse conditions showed that pellets derived from CC and CO, particularly when combined with BB-char and AMF (T6 and T7), enhanced shoot and root development in carrot, chili, cucumber, and tomato, approaching the performance of commercial peat pellets. In contrast, DL- and TL-based pellets resulted in lower germination and growth. These findings indicate that both the physicochemical properties of lignocellulosic wastes and the combination of BB-char and AMF are important factors influencing pellet efficacy, highlighting the potential of CC- and CO-based pellets as sustainable peat alternatives for early-stage plant cultivation.

Abstract from the paper’s OpenAlex record; open copy licensed cc-by. Read at the source ↗

The text the model read, with the source record’s inline markup (italics, sub- and superscripts) rendered and its character entities decoded; quote offsets refer to the raw text.

Claims 7

Observationobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Cucumber had high tolerance across phytotoxicity screening treatments.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Outcome
high tolerancee0
Qualifier
across treatmentse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“cucumber exhibiting high tolerance across treatments”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1064–1116 · show in text ↑
Observationobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

Chili seeds were more sensitive in phytotoxicity screening.

Taxon
chilie0
Organ / stage
seedse0
Outcome
more sensitivee0

Verbatim

e0

“chili seeds were more sensitive”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1126–1157 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CC and CO pellets with BB-char and AMF enhanced carrot shoot and root development, approaching peat pellets.

Taxon
carrotDaucus carotae0
Treatment
pellets derived from CC and CO, particularly when combined with BB-char and AMF (T6 and T7)e0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root developmente0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
commercial peat pelletse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Daucus carota
Daucus carota · TaxonZeynel Cebeci · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pellets derived from CC and CO, particularly when combined with BB-char and AMF (T6 and T7), enhanced shoot and root development in carrot, chili, cucumber, and tomato, approaching the performance of commercial peat pellets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CC and CO pellets with BB-char and AMF enhanced chili shoot and root development, approaching peat pellets.

Taxon
chilie0
Treatment
pellets derived from CC and CO, particularly when combined with BB-char and AMF (T6 and T7)e0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root developmente0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
commercial peat pelletse0

Verbatim

e0

“pellets derived from CC and CO, particularly when combined with BB-char and AMF (T6 and T7), enhanced shoot and root development in carrot, chili, cucumber, and tomato, approaching the performance of commercial peat pellets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CC and CO pellets with BB-char and AMF enhanced cucumber shoot and root development, approaching peat pellets.

Taxon
cucumberCucumis sativuse0
Treatment
pellets derived from CC and CO, particularly when combined with BB-char and AMF (T6 and T7)e0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root developmente0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
commercial peat pelletse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Cucumis sativus
Cucumis sativus · TaxonH. Zell · CC BY-SA 3.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pellets derived from CC and CO, particularly when combined with BB-char and AMF (T6 and T7), enhanced shoot and root development in carrot, chili, cucumber, and tomato, approaching the performance of commercial peat pellets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultpositivemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

CC and CO pellets with BB-char and AMF enhanced tomato shoot and root development, approaching peat pellets.

Treatment
pellets derived from CC and CO, particularly when combined with BB-char and AMF (T6 and T7)e0
Interactor
AMFe0symbiont
Outcome
shoot and root developmente0
Direction
enhancede0
Comparator
commercial peat pelletse0

Organisms pictured · Representative pictures of the matched species, not figures from the paper.

Solanum lycopersicum
Solanum lycopersicum · TaxonKod B · CC BY-SA 4.0 · Wikimedia Commons ↗

Verbatim

e0

“pellets derived from CC and CO, particularly when combined with BB-char and AMF (T6 and T7), enhanced shoot and root development in carrot, chili, cucumber, and tomato, approaching the performance of commercial peat pellets.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1258–1482 · show in text ↑
Intervention effectobservedoriginal resultnegativemeasured

Claim · model-written summary

DL- and TL-based pellets gave lower germination and growth.

Treatment
DL- and TL-based pelletse0
Outcome
germination and growthe0
Direction
lowere0

Not reportedTaxonComparator

Verbatim

e0

“DL- and TL-based pellets resulted in lower germination and growth.”

✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1496–1562 · show in text ↑

Zea mays subsp. mays · growth · Daucus carota (carrot)Positive and negative results

3 papers: 2 positive, 1 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. positive
See all 3 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 1 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Results agree

2 papers: 2 positive, 0 negative or no effect

1 paper in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
See all 2 papers →

Zea mays subsp. mays · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results agree

6 papers: 6 positive, 0 negative or no effect

5 papers in the same direction as this paper

  1. positive
  2. positive
  3. positive

2 papers more in this group

See all 6 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Cucumis sativus (cucumber)Results differ

39 papers: 31 positive, 8 negative or no effect

30 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. no effect
  3. negative

35 papers more in this group

See all 39 papers →

biochar · growth · Solanum lycopersicum (tomato)Results differ

80 papers: 71 positive, 9 negative or no effect

70 papers in the same direction as this paper · 8 in the opposite direction · 1 reporting no difference from an alternative

  1. no effect
  2. negative
  3. negative

76 papers more in this group

See all 80 papers →

mycorrhiza · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

11 papers: 9 positive, 2 negative or no effect

8 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. negative
  2. negative
  3. positive

7 papers more in this group

See all 11 papers →

growing medium · growth · Capsicum (peppers)Positive and negative results

21 papers: 19 positive, 2 negative or no effect

18 papers in the same direction as this paper · 2 in the opposite direction

  1. no effect
  2. no effect
  3. positive

17 papers more in this group

See all 21 papers →

8 of 16 groups shown: named compounds and organisms first, then groups whose results differ (checked claim by claim), then those with positive and negative results, then the smaller groups.

Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. A paper counts as positive when any of its claims in the group is positive.