molybdenum atom · Quality: protein · Glycine max (soybean)
31 claims from these papers; 1 citation between them.
Papers whose results differ, checked claim by claim 6
6 pairs of papers on this question report results that differ: an effect in one paper, the opposite effect or no effect in the other. Two model reviewers reading both claims accepted each pair.
- Effect of Time of Molybdenum Application on Soybean Yield and on Nitrogen, Oil, and Molybdenum Contents (1969)
increaseMo application increased soybean protein content.
Effect of sulphur and molybdenum on nodulation, protein and nutrient content of soybean cv. Shohag (2006)no changeMolybdenum alone did not significantly influence soybean protein content.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Effect of microelement on the quality of soybean (2007)
increaseMolybdenum increased soybean protein content.
EFFECT OF MOLYBDENUM AND BORON POLLUTION ON QUALITY OF SOYBEAN (2003)decreaseHigh Mo and/or B decreased soybean seed protein.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Soybean Response to Molybdenum and Lime and the Relationship Between Yield and Chemical Composition1 (1962)
increaseMo increased soybean seed yield, leaf N, seed protein and seed weight on moderately acid soils.
Effect of sulphur and molybdenum on nodulation, protein and nutrient content of soybean cv. Shohag (2006)no changeMolybdenum alone did not significantly influence soybean protein content.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Effect of sulphur and molybdenum on nodulation, protein and nutrient content of soybean cv. Shohag (2006)
no changeMolybdenum alone did not significantly influence soybean protein content.
Role of phosphorus and molybdenum on root growth, nodulation and nutrient uptake of soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merr.] (2021)increaseSoybean protein content was significantly higher (40.2 %) with Mo seed treatment at 6 g/kg seed.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Effect of sulphur and molybdenum on nodulation, protein and nutrient content of soybean cv. Shohag (2006)
no changeMolybdenum alone did not significantly influence soybean protein content.
Molybdenum and nickel foliar application on soybean yield and oil and protein contents (2024)increaseFoliar Mo increased grain protein content in the evaluated genotypes.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers → - Effect of microelement on the quality of soybean (2007)
increaseMolybdenum increased soybean protein content.
Effect of sulphur and molybdenum on nodulation, protein and nutrient content of soybean cv. Shohag (2006)no changeMolybdenum alone did not significantly influence soybean protein content.
The records name no dose, test system or situation that separates the two claims.Compare the two papers →
How these papers cite each other
1 citation between these papers: 1 on the same side, 0 across the two sides.
- Positive result
- Negative result or no effect
- Citation, pointing to the cited paper
- Citation across the two sides
- Larger circle: more citations overall
Years run left to right. Citations come from the papers’ OpenAlex reference lists. Hover a paper to bring forward its citations; click it to open the paper.
Papers reporting a positive result 21
Soybean Response to Molybdenum and Lime and the Relationship Between Yield and Chemical Composition1 · 1962
- positive
- positive
Effect of Molybdenum and Boron on Quality of Soybean · 2003
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Effect of microelement on the quality of soybean · 2007
- positive
Effect of boron and molybdenum on yield and quality of different genetic varieties of soybean · 2008
- positive
- positive
Effect of B-Mo Trace Elements on Soybean Quality and Yield · 2009
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
EFFICIENCY OF SOME ECHO FRIENDLY MICROELEMENTS IN CONTROLLING SOYBEAN DAMPING-OFF · 2021
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Investigation of nitrogen fixation activity soybeans plants by mineral fertilizers foliar treatment · 2023
- positive
- positive
Molybdenum and nickel foliar application on soybean yield and oil and protein contents · 2024
- positive
- positive
- no effect
QUALITY OF SOYBEAN SEEDS WITH FOLIARY PLANTS TREATMENT WITH MINERAL FERTILIZERS · 2025
- positive
- positive
- positive
- positive
Papers reporting a negative result or no effect 4
EFFECT OF MOLYBDENUM AND BORON POLLUTION ON QUALITY OF SOYBEAN · 2003
- negative
Effect of sulphur and molybdenum on nodulation, protein and nutrient content of soybean cv. Shohag · 2006
- no effect
- negative
- no effect
A paper is on the positive side when any of its claims here is positive. Claims are grouped by organism, treatment and what was measured or targeted. Claims that compare genotypes are left out; a claim about lacking a nutrient counts the other way round in that nutrient’s question. “Results differ” marks a question where two model reviewers, reading both claims, accepted at least one pair of papers whose results differ.