View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Branching phenotypes in the sunflower F2 population segregated in a 3:1 ratio that fit expectation.
MaterialF2 population (n = 660) e2 Outcomesegregation fitting a 3:1 ratio e0 Verbatim
e0 “segregation fitting a 3:1 ratio (χ2 = 2.916, p > 0.05) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 565–619 e1 “sunflowers (Helianthus annuus L.) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 124–157 e2 “F2 population (n = 660) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 367–390 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Class III chitinase showed no significant response to chitin treatment.
Treatmentchitin treatment e0 GeneClass III chitinase e0 Directionno_change inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “potato chitinases ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–123 e0 “Class III chitinase showed no significant response to chitin treatment but was significantly upregulated under drought stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 775–900 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
RT-qPCR showed no significant difference in AaCyt b expression between sensitive and resistant A. alternata isolates.
Directionno significant difference e0 Comparatorsensitive and resistant isolates e0 Verbatim
e0 “RT-qPCR analysis showed no significant difference in AaCyt b expression between sensitive and resistant isolates ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1522–1634 t0 “Alternaria alternata ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 106–126 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No significant phenotypic changes were observed in Arabidopsis overexpressing LaFT4 or LaTFL1-3.
Treatmentoverexpressed LaFT4 or LaTFL1-3 e0 Outcomephenotypic changes e0 Directionno significant phenotypic changes e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “no significant phenotypic changes were observed in Arabidopsis overexpressed LaFT4 or LaTFL1-3 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1142–1236 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Quantitative real-time PCR showed no significant difference in Psat4g213640 expression between CW9-8 and CW9-1.
MaterialCW9-8 and CW9-1 e1 Outcomeexpression levels of Psat4g213640 e1 Verbatim
e0 “Pisum sativum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 14–27 e1 “no significant difference in the expression levels of Psat4g213640 between CW9-8 and CW9-1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1678–1768 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
DNA methylation profiles did not differ significantly between genome ancestries Vl and Vv.
OutcomeDNA methylation profiles e1 Qualifierbetween genome ancestries e1 Verbatim
e0 “The tetraploid table grape Kyoho ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–32 e1 “comparisons of DNA methylation profiles showed no significant differences between genome ancestries Vl (0.009∼0.676): Vv (0.010∼0.670) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 970–1104 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No significant transcriptomic changes were detected in etr2b ovaries between 0 and 3 DPA.
Outcometranscriptomic changes e1 Verbatim
t0 “Ethylene-Mediated Parthenocarpy of Zucchini ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–124 e1 “with no significant transcriptomic changes detected in etr2b ovaries between 0 and 3 DPA ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 589–677 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Oat varieties did not differ significantly in avenin transcript abundance across the entire maturation period.
Outcomeabundance of avenin transcripts e5 Verbatim
t0 “six oat varieties ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 42–59 e5 “Although oat varieties did not differ significantly in the abundance of avenin transcripts across the entire maturation period, differences in the abundance of avenin proteins in matured grain proved to be statistically significant ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 947–1178 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Overexpressing BnaA09.SEIPIN2 had no significant effect on seed oil content relative to wild type.
Directionno significant effect e1 Verbatim
t0 “in Brassica napus ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–101 e1 “no significant effect of BnaA09.SEIPIN2 on oil content was observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 983–1050 e3 “the expression levels of some key genes related to lipid synthesis and storage were altered significantly between overexpression lines and WT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1219–1360 e6 “BnaC03.SEIPIN1 and BnaA09.SEIPIN2 were cloned to be overexpressed in B. napus seeds specifically ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 745–841 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Genome size showed only a weak relationship with environmental variables, and the hypothesis of significant environmental impact on genome size was rejected.
Treatmentenvironmental variables e5 Qualifierweak relationship e5 Not reported Direction
Verbatim
e4 “rejecting our hypothesis associated with environmental variables significantly impacting genome sizes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1242–1343 e5 “A weak relationship between genome size and environmental variables suggests that other factors, including paleotetraploid genomic stability, have constrained genome size variation following a WGD 16+ million years ago ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1577–1795 t0 “Leucaena (Fabaceae) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 50–69 Other claims from this paper (4) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.