View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Triticum aestivum ✕
Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Mineral nutrition caused a decrease in relative water content in spring wheat.
Treatmentmineral nutrition e4 Verbatim
e0 “Water stress significantly made relative water content (RWC) in spring wheat leaves drop sharply ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1–97 e4 “The phenomenon of RWC decrease caused by mineral nutrition was also observed ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1125–1201 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf rust decrease relative water content in wheat by -11.42.
Interactorleaf rust e0 pathogen Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “BREAD WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 84–95 e0 “there was -42.92, -23.72, -23.01, and -11.42, % decrease in chlorophyll content , flag leaf area, specific flag leaf area and relative water content in leaf rust (diseased) plot respectively ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 620–809 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d relative water content across all cultivars.
Treatmentdrought-treated e0 Outcomerelative water content (RWC) e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “winter wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 37–49 e0 “a decrease in relative water content (RWC) and in crease of malondialdehyde content were observed in drought-treated plants of all cultivars. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 557–697 Other claims from this paper (15) Intervention effect Drought lowered CO2 assimilation and transpiration rate across all cultivars. Observation Drought caused stomata closure across all cultivars. Intervention effect Drought increased malondialdehyde content across all cultivars. Observation The drought-related changes were most pronounced in Ellvis. Observation Soissons retained higher relative water content and CO2 assimilation under drought. Intervention effect Sugars, organic acids, amino acids and sugar alcohols accumulated to higher levels with drought than in controls. Association Several metabolites accumulated differently among genotypes under drought. Intervention effect Drought induced sucrose, malic and oxalic acids in four of six genotypes. Intervention effect Drought induced unknown organic acid 1 and unknown disaccharides 1, 2 and 3 in four of six genotypes. Intervention effect Drought induced GABA, L-threonine and glutamic acid in four of six genotypes. Observation Soissons accumulated the highest amount of unknown disaccharide 5, galactonic and phosphoric acids. Intervention effect Srpanjka increased glucose and fructose under drought. Observation Srpanjka accumulated unidentified sugar alcohols 1 and 2 under drought. Intervention effect In Ellvis, drought decreased Pn, gs and RWC. Intervention effect In Ellvis, drought decreased accumulation of sucrose, glucose and fructose. Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Root cooling at +1°C in duced a decrease of about 2% in relative water content of the leaves.
Outcomerelative water content of the leaves e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e1 “a treatment which in duced a decrease of about 2% in relative water content of the leaves ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 285–373 e2 “kept with the roots at +1°C in nutrient solution and with the shoots in air at 20°C for 24 h ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 191–283 t0 “Water Flow in Wheat Seedlings after Small Water Deficits ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–56 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Under water stress, YS-1L had a smaller decrease in leaf relative water content than other wheat species.
TreatmentStress treatment e0 Directionmuch smaller decrease e0 Comparatorother wheat species e0 Verbatim
e0 “Stress treatment caused a much smaller decrease in the leaf RWC and rise in MDA content in YS-1L compared to the other wheat species. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1284–1417 Other claims from this paper (7) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat leaf water content decrease d in winter relative to summer.
Outcomeleaf water content e0 Verbatim
e0 “An in crease in excised-leaf water retention capability and a decrease in leaf water content were seen during winter compared to summer. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 197–332 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 68–73 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought decrease d wheat relative water content by 35.57%.
Treatmentstressed conditions e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In the present study with 92 genotypes, a decrease of 35.57% for relative water content and 23.08% was observed for chlorophyll content in the stressed conditions ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 962–1124 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 53–58 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Water logging caused wheat relative water content of flag leaf to decrease .
Outcomerelative water content of flag leaf e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Results showed water logging made the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf in crease, made the root vigor, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content of flag leaf decrease , the content of organic matter change obviously, and then the yield per plant declined. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 183–516 t0 “Changes of Physiological Characters of Wheat After Water logging at Booting and Relations Between Physiological Characters and Water logging Tolerance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–149 Other claims from this paper (8) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Chamran under I1 had the smallest relative water content decline relative to I4.
Treatmentdrought stress treatment (I1) e0 Outcomerelative water content e0 Directionlowest decrease e0 Comparatorcontrol treatment (I4) e0 Verbatim
t0 “BREAD WHEAT ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 114–125 e0 “The Chamran cultivar (C1) on drought stress treatment (I1) had the lowest decrease in relative water content and total chlorophyll content than with control treatment (I4). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1180–1352 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Water logging decrease d wheat relative water content in flag leaf.
Outcomerelative water content in flag leaf e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the water logging made the root vigor decrease , the content of malondialdehyde in flag leaf in crease, the content of chlorophyll, the net photosynthesis rate, the nitrate reductase activity, the relative water content in flag leaf decrease , the content of organic matter change obviously ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 213–499 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 39–44 Other claims from this paper (16) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.