View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Organism: Triticum aestivum ✕
Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl caused the greatest decrease in weed dry weight .
TreatmentFenoxaprop-p-ethyl e0 Outcomedry weight production e0 Directionmaximum decrease e0 Comparatorother chemicals e0 Verbatim
e0 “Fenoxaprop-p-ethyl showed the most potent direct effect and caused maximum decrease in little seed canary grass (P. minor ) population and its dry weight production in comparison to other chemicals ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 348–544 t0 “in wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 111–119 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed management treatments decrease d weed density and dry weight .
Treatmentall treatments e0 Outcomeweed density and dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a substantial decrease in weed density and dry weight across all treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1105 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing disease severity decrease d surviving seedling dry weight .
Interactorsharp eyespot disease t1 pathogen Verbatim
e0 “In creasing disease severity caused a decrease in height and dry weight of surviving seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 120–213 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 75–80 t1 “sharp eyespot disease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–32 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry weight of in oculated wheat plants decrease d by 15 to 43% compared with non- in oculated control.
Outcomedry weight of plants e3 Comparatornon-inoculated control e3 Verbatim
t0 “Triticum aestivum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 20–37 e3 “Almost 15 to 43% decrease in dry weight of plants was observed as compared to non- in oculated control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 640–740 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Wheat shoot fresh and dry weight declined significantly across in tercropping ratios.
Treatmentdifferent ratios e0 Outcomefresh and dry weight of wheat shoots e0 Verbatim
e0 “The fresh and dry weight of wheat shoots showed a significant decrease at different ratios compared to the control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–858 Other claims from this paper (10) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fresh and dry shoot weight fell as nematode in oculum in creased.
Treatmentlevel of inocula e0 Outcomeweight of fresh and dry shoot e0 Verbatim
e0 “There was a gradual decrease in shoot and root length, weight of fresh and dry shoot as the level of in ocula in creased. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 794–913 e1 “in ocula of Meloidogyne graminicola ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 110–144 t0 “wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 99–104 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In creasing walnut leaf extract concentration decrease d wheat seedling fresh and dry weight .
Treatmentincreasing aqueous extracts concentration e0 Outcomeseedling fresh and dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “In variably there was a decrease in first count, germination, seedling root and shoot length, seedling fresh and dry weight and vigour in dex with in creasing aqueous extracts concentration on germinating wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 659–866 Other claims from this paper (4) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In oculation with B. paranthracis TSO55 decrease d wheat seedling root dry weight by 18.6% compared with the uninoculated control.
TreatmentInoculation of B. paranthracis TSO55 e1 Comparatorcontrol (uninoculated) treatment e1 Verbatim
e1 “In oculation of B. paranthracis TSO55 on wheat seedlings resulted in a significant decrease in root length (−8.4%), total plant height (−4.2%), root dry weight (−18.6%), stem dry weight (−11.1%), and total plant dry weight (−15.2%) compared to the control (uninoculated) treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1713–1992 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In oculation with B. paranthracis TSO55 decrease d wheat seedling stem dry weight by 11.1% compared with the uninoculated control.
TreatmentInoculation of B. paranthracis TSO55 e1 Comparatorcontrol (uninoculated) treatment e1 Verbatim
e1 “In oculation of B. paranthracis TSO55 on wheat seedlings resulted in a significant decrease in root length (−8.4%), total plant height (−4.2%), root dry weight (−18.6%), stem dry weight (−11.1%), and total plant dry weight (−15.2%) compared to the control (uninoculated) treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1713–1992 Other claims from this paper (16) Intervention effect observed original result negative significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
In oculation with B. paranthracis TSO55 decrease d wheat seedling total plant dry weight by 15.2% compared with the uninoculated control.
TreatmentInoculation of B. paranthracis TSO55 e1 Outcometotal plant dry weight e1 Comparatorcontrol (uninoculated) treatment e1 Verbatim
e1 “In oculation of B. paranthracis TSO55 on wheat seedlings resulted in a significant decrease in root length (−8.4%), total plant height (−4.2%), root dry weight (−18.6%), stem dry weight (−11.1%), and total plant dry weight (−15.2%) compared to the control (uninoculated) treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1713–1992 Other claims from this paper (16) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.