View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Double Nickel did not significantly reduce white mold incidence on plants compared with nontreated plots.
Outcomeincidence on plants e0 Directionno_change inferred e0 Comparatornontreated control plots e0 Verbatim
e0 “All products significantly reduced the incidence on plants compared with nontreated control plots, except for Double Nickel ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 412–535 e1 “Sclerotinia sclerotiorum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 t0 “Dry Black Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–68 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
White mold incidence on plants with Double Nickel was not significantly different from Howler EVO, Theia and Badge X2.
Outcomeincidence on plants e0 Directionnot significantly different e0 ComparatorHowler EVO, Theia, and Badge X2 e0 Verbatim
e0 “The incidence on plants in plots receiving Double Nickel was not significantly different from Howler EVO, Theia, and Badge X2 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 537–662 e1 “Sclerotinia sclerotiorum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 t0 “Dry Black Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–68 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
White mold incidence on pods did not differ significantly between the treatments.
Treatmentall treatments e0 Outcomeincidence of white mold on pods e0 Directionnot significantly different e0 Verbatim
e0 “The incidence of white mold on pods was significantly reduced by all treatments compared with control plots, and they were not significantly different between each other ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 664–833 e1 “Sclerotinia sclerotiorum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 22–46 t0 “Dry Black Bean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 54–68 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Carrier volume (140 versus 280 L ha -1) did not significantly affect Palmer amaranth control.
Treatmentcarrier volume e0 OutcomePalmer amaranth control e0 Directiondid not significantly affect e0 Qualifier140 L ha -1 and 280 L ha -1 e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “carrier volume did not significantly affect Palmer amaranth control at these volumes ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1360–1444 e1 “mixtures of 140 L ha -1 and 280 L ha -1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1291–1330 Other claims from this paper (3) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Alternating Trichoderma with synthetic fungicides was statistically equivalent to Trichoderma alone in disease control.
Treatmentalternating application of Trichoderma with synthetic fungicides e0 Directionstatistically equivalent e0 ComparatorTrichoderma -alone treatmente0 Verbatim
e0 “The alternating application of Trichoderma with synthetic fungicides proved statistically equivalent to the Trichoderma -alone treatment in disease control ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1130–1284 t1 “Potato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 128–134 t0 “Sclerotinia sclerotiorum ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 85–109 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
After 28 years the stumping treatment failed to significantly reduce infection incidence and mortality in planted spruce trees.
Treatmentstumping treatment e0 Outcomeincidence of infection and mortality e0 Directionno_change inferred e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “after 28 years, we found the stumping treatment failed to significantly reduce the incidence of infection and mortality in planted spruce trees ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1081–1224 Other claims from this paper (4) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
No significant differences between the indigenous strains were detected in growth chamber experiments.
Outcomedifferences between strains e0 Settinggrowth chamber experiments e0 Verbatim
e0 “no significant differences between strains were detected in growth chamber experiments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 578–664 t0 “soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 81–88 t1 “Bradyrhizobium ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 11–25 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Microbial bio-inoculation had no significant effect on agronomic traits or yield of pea in the field.
Treatmentmicrobial bio-inoculation e0 Outcomeagronomic traits or yield e0 Directionno significant effects e0 SettingUnder field conditions e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Pisum sativum L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–113 e0 “Under field conditions, no significant effects of fertilization level, microbial bio-inoculation, or their interaction were detected on agronomic traits or yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1329 Other claims from this paper (14) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
The interaction of fertilization level and bio-inoculation had no significant effect on agronomic traits or yield of pea in the field.
Treatmenttheir interaction e0 Outcomeagronomic traits or yield e0 Directionno significant effects e0 SettingUnder field conditions e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Pisum sativum L. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 97–113 e0 “Under field conditions, no significant effects of fertilization level, microbial bio-inoculation, or their interaction were detected on agronomic traits or yield ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1168–1329 Other claims from this paper (14) Observation observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Mantel tests found no isolation-by-distance (r = 0.004, P = 0.650).
Outcomeisolation-by-distance e0 Verbatim
e0 “Mantel tests confirmed no isolation-by-distance (r = 0.004, P = 0.650) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 855–925 t0 “Phytophthora palmivora in Colombian Cacao ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 26–67 Other claims from this paper (9) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.