View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry conditions led to a decrease in honeysuckle fruit weight .
TreatmentDry conditions e1 Outcomethe weight of the fruit e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “HONEYSUCKLE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–38 e1 “Dry conditions had a negative impact on productivity, leading to shedding of the ovary, a decrease in the weight of the fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1148 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower radiation decrease d root dry weight ratio.
Outcomeratio of root dry weight (RWR) to whole plant dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in ratio of root dry weight (RWR) to whole plant dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–941 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 Other claims from this paper (10) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The root dry - weight decrease was greater in Inpara 5 than Mahsuri.
Outcomeroot and shoot dry weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease of root and shoot dry weight in Inpara 5 was higher than that of Mahsuri ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1088 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–97 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The shoot dry - weight decrease was greater in Inpara 5 than Mahsuri.
Outcomeroot and shoot dry weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease of root and shoot dry weight in Inpara 5 was higher than that of Mahsuri ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1088 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–97 Other claims from this paper (6) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Genotype G-3 showed the smallest decrease in shoot and root dry weight under water-deficit stress.
Outcomeshoot dry weight and root dry weight e2 Directionsmallest decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Assessment of Drought Tolerance in Mung Bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 e2 “G-3 showed the smallest decrease in shoot dry weight and root dry weight under WD stress, whereas G-5 showed the biggest decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1534 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Genotype G-5 showed the biggest decrease in shoot and root dry weight under water-deficit stress.
Outcomeshoot dry weight and root dry weight e2 Directionbiggest decrease e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “Assessment of Drought Tolerance in Mung Bean [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–73 e2 “G-3 showed the smallest decrease in shoot dry weight and root dry weight under WD stress, whereas G-5 showed the biggest decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1405–1534 Other claims from this paper (12) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Kernel dry weight subsequently decrease d as hidden loss.
Verbatim
e0 “After that, there was even a decrease in dry weight which was called hidden loss ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1122–1202 t0 “Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 0–4 Other claims from this paper (7) Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Salinity up to 4 dS m- 1 did not affect germination rate decrease or single seedling dry weight .
Treatmentirrigation water salinity e0 Outcomegermination rate decrease and the single seedling dry weight e0 Directionhad not affected e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “The irrigation water salinity had not affected up to 4 dS m- 1 in terms of the germination rate decrease and the single seedling dry weight of rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 730–877 Other claims from this paper (9) Intervention effect observed original result no effect not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Raising the seeding rate from 2.5 to 3.0 million pieces per hectare did not significantly decrease dry weed weight .
Treatment3.0 million pieces per hectare e0 Outcomedry weeds weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “An increase in the seeding rate from 2.5 to 3.0 million pieces per hectare did not provide a significant decrease in dry weeds weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1366–1499 t0 “brown mustard (Brassica juncea ) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 67–98 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Weed management treatments decrease d weed density and dry weight .
Treatmentall treatments e0 Outcomeweed density and dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “a substantial decrease in weed density and dry weight across all treatments ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1030–1105 t0 “Wheat ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 Other claims from this paper (10) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.