View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Average seedling dry weight did not decrease after acetone immersion.
OutcomeAverage seedling dry weight e0 Directiondid not decrease e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “8 hours of immersion in acetone. Average seedling dry weight , however, did not decrease . ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 744–832 t0 “Sweet Corn ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 23–33 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Dry conditions led to a decrease in honeysuckle fruit weight .
TreatmentDry conditions e1 Outcomethe weight of the fruit e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
t0 “HONEYSUCKLE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–38 e1 “Dry conditions had a negative impact on productivity, leading to shedding of the ovary, a decrease in the weight of the fruit ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1023–1148 Other claims from this paper (12) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Nematode inoculation before fungus caused 33.08% root- dry - weight decrease .
Treatmentnematode was inoculated prior to fungus e1 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “root dry weight (33.08) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 278–301 e1 “when nematode was inoculated prior to fungus. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–511 e2 “per cent decrease of plant growth parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–221 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Fresh and dry weight per plant tended to decrease in reciprocal cross line 1.
Materialreciprocal cross line 1 e1 Outcomefresh and dry weight per plant e0 Verbatim
t0 “forage soybean ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 58–72 e0 “fresh and dry weight per plant tended to decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 883–932 e1 “reciprocal cross line 1 ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 776–799 Other claims from this paper (8) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Nematode inoculation before fungus caused 51.5% shoot- dry - weight decrease .
Treatmentnematode was inoculated prior to fungus e1 Outcomeshoot dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “shoot length (41.87), shoot dry weight (51.5) and root dry weight (33.08) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 228–301 e1 “when nematode was inoculated prior to fungus. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 466–511 e2 “per cent decrease of plant growth parameters ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 177–221 t0 “Tomato ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 63–69 Other claims from this paper (9) Observation observed original result no effect measured Claim · model-written summary
Root dry weight of chilling-tolerant maize hybrids did not decrease .
Materialmaize hybrids with chilling tolerance e0 Outcomedry weight of root e0 Directiondidn't decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “The results show that the dry weight of root of maize hybrids with chilling tolerance didn't decrease ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 368–469 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Lower radiation decrease d root dry weight ratio.
Outcomeratio of root dry weight (RWR) to whole plant dry weight e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “the decrease in ratio of root dry weight (RWR) to whole plant dry weight ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 869–941 t0 “Maize ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 91–96 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
In rice seedlings, The increase of dry weight of shoot and the decrease of dry weight of grain were smaller in SLH than in YSS during the raising of seedlings.
Outcomedecrease of dry weight of grain e0 Verbatim
e0 “The increase of dry weight of shoot and the decrease of dry weight of grain were smaller in SLH than in YSS during the raising of seedlings ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 407–546 t0 “rice ”
✓ located after whitespace/quote normalisation · title, characters 44–48 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The root dry - weight decrease was greater in Inpara 5 than Mahsuri.
Outcomeroot and shoot dry weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease of root and shoot dry weight in Inpara 5 was higher than that of Mahsuri ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1088 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–97 Other claims from this paper (6) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
The shoot dry - weight decrease was greater in Inpara 5 than Mahsuri.
Outcomeroot and shoot dry weight e0 Verbatim
e0 “The decrease of root and shoot dry weight in Inpara 5 was higher than that of Mahsuri ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1003–1088 t0 “Rice ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 93–97 Other claims from this paper (6) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.