View: List Claim type Research area Organism Taxon as written Decade Paper Intervention effect observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Stimulate® spraying lessened the decrease in relative water content under water limitation.
relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “relative water content had a less decrease , due to osmotic adjustment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1085 t0 “Eucalyptus urophylla
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 t1 “plants sprayed with Stimulate® ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 948–978 Other claims from this paper (5) Intervention effect observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Drought caused a decrease in relative water content .
Drought stress e0 relative water content e0 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “Drought stress resulted in a sharp decrease of the relative water content and in crease of the membrane permeability and proline content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 960–1095 t0 “Pear Seedling ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 77–90 Other claims from this paper (10) Intervention effect observed original result significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Water stress decrease d leaf area and relative water content in mulberry, with a marked decrease only in severe stress.
leaf area and relative water content e2 a marked decrease was observed only in severe stress treatment e2 Not reported Comparator
Verbatim
e0 “in 3-month-old mulberry plants at four levels of water stress ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 87–148 e2 “Though leaf area and relative water content decrease d, significantly, a marked decrease was observed only in severe stress treatment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 248–380 Other claims from this paper (6) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf water potential and relative water content fell with drought.
drought stress e0 leaf water potential (Ψ) and relative water content e0 Verbatim
t0 “POMEGRANATE SEEDLINGS ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 82–103 e0 “A gradual decrease in leaf water potential (Ψ) and relative water content was evident with in creasing drought stress levels. ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 975–1099 Other claims from this paper (7) Association observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content tended to decrease with PEG stress in tensity and time.
stress intensity and the treating time e0 relative water content in leaves e0 Verbatim
e0 “the relative water content in leaves showed a decrease d tendency with the in crease of stress in tensity and the treating time ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 344–468 t0 “Salak [Salacca zalacca (Gaertner) Voss] ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 44–82 Other claims from this paper (8) Association observed original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Cj rootstock showed the smallest decrease in leaf relative water content and leaf area under drought.
leaf relative water content and leaf area e1 Verbatim
e0 “Harumi tangor plants grafted onto Poncirus trifoliata (Pt), Citrus junos (Cj), and Citrus tangerine (Ct) ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 216–320 e1 “The leaf relative water content and leaf area of the three rootstocks decrease d with in creasing drought stress, with the smallest decrease in Cj ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 322–466 Other claims from this paper (13) Observation observed original result not significant (as stated) measured Claim · model-written summary
Stem relative water content did not decrease significantly during the day.
relative water content (RWC) e0 did not decrease e0 Verbatim
e0 “stem relative water content (RWC) and stem hydraulic conductivity (K(s)) of this bamboo species did not decrease significantly during the day ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 362–503 t0 “Sinarundinaria nitida (Mitford) Nakai
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 246–283 Other claims from this paper (11) Observation observed original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
High salinity decrease d relative water content and water potential.
relative water content and water potential e0 Verbatim
e0 “High salinity led also to a decrease in the relative water content and water potential ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1136–1222 t0 “Calligonum caput-medusae
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 123–147 Other claims from this paper (15) Observation observed original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Leaf relative water content may slightly decline through the day.
Leaf relative water content e0 day of June, with normal temperature, no rain, no water restriction in soil e0 Verbatim
e0 “Leaf relative water content has maximum value in the morning; the values may slightly decrease during the day (day of June, with normal temperature, no rain, no water restriction in soil). ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 533–721 t0 “GRAPEVINE ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–78 Other claims from this paper (2) Mechanism author interpretation original result positive measured Claim · model-written summary
Osmotic adjustment was presented as the cause of the smaller decrease in relative water content .
relative water content e0 osmotic adjustment e0 Verbatim
e0 “relative water content had a less decrease , due to osmotic adjustment ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 1016–1085 t0 “Eucalyptus urophylla
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 27–47 Other claims from this paper (5) Mechanism author interpretation original result measured Claim · model-written summary
Declining relative water content partly explained the fall in leaf osmotic potential.
leaf osmotic potential e0 decrease in relative water content e0 Verbatim
e0 “fall in leaf osmotic potential was partly accounted for by a decrease in relative water content ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 683–778 t0 “APRICOT LEAVES ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · title, characters 69–83 Other claims from this paper (11) Mechanism author interpretation original result negative measured Claim · model-written summary
A decrease in photosynthesis in holm oak resulted from coordinated suppression of leaf conductance.
coordinated suppression in leaf conductance e1 Verbatim
e0 “Diffusional limitations to photosynthesis (A), relative water content (RWC) and their association with photochemical reflectance in dex (PRI) were studied in holm oak (Quercus ilex L.) saplings subjected to water stress and subsequent water stress relief ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 0–253 e1 “A decrease in A resulted from coordinated suppression in leaf conductance ”
✓ located verbatim in the source · abstract, characters 488–561 Other claims from this paper (15) Lexical search (BM25). All words must match; if nothing does, any word. Organism names also match every spelling of the same organism. No semantic search yet.
Eucalyptus urophyllat0_Poirier_Fleurs_et_feuilles.jpg?width=60){kind=small}
Pyrus communis
Punica granatum
Fargesia nitida
Vitis
Prunus armeniaca
Quercus ilex